Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Glow Catcher // Отзывы

Channel

Glow Catcher // Отзывы

@GlowCatcherReviews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002480992584
TypeChannel
Username@GlowCatcherReviews
Created6 February 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/GlowCatcherReviews

Growth

2210 Aug 2026, 22:45 — 22 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 13:32 — 22 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 22:4511 Aug 2026, 13:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:3222no change
10 Aug 2026, 22:4522first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 6 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

1 May 2025, 11:20 UTC135 viewsread 11 August 2026

Ну что сказать, софт впринципе топовый, быстро окупился, с начала думал что хуйня, и ничего работать не будет, но потом пошло поехало, советую к покупке - @GlowCatcher

8 Apr 2025, 10:42 UTC176 viewsread 11 August 2026

софт имбовый, лучше чем этот нигде еще не видел, окупился за 2 дня, всем советую к покупке @GlowCatcher

6 Apr 2025, 01:25 UTC188 viewsread 11 August 2026

Софт реально годный. Сам подписывается на каналы, нужно лишь терпение. Ловить успевает все что скидывают, по скорости наверное равных ему нет. Все чётко, рекомендую @GlowCatcher

26 Mar 2025, 17:52 UTC213 viewsread 11 August 2026

Отзыв, ну с учетом того, что я пользовался твоим софтом еще давно, хочу сказать, что лучше и круче на рынке никого нет, от слова совсем За свои деньги вообще кайф т.к окупает за один день Так что всем советую и рекомендую @GlowCatcher

26 Mar 2025, 16:29 UTC189 viewsread 11 August 2026

скрипт ахуенный, всем советую @GlowCatcher

17 Feb 2025, 11:34 UTC394 viewsread 11 August 2026

@GlowCatcher - самый лучший ловец, изи 150$ с чека.

17 Feb 2025, 08:54 UTC372 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Купил софт когда он стоил 15$ Поставил в общем на софт около 20$ Через 3д поймал примерно 7$ Через пол месяца смог одним чеком поймать 20$ Лучший @GlowCatcher

10 Feb 2025, 13:04 UTC300 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

секс порно пушка +120$ с 1 чека. Хотелось бы анон но меня послали нахуй @GlowCatcher

10 Feb 2025, 13:01 UTC230 viewsread 11 August 2026

пожалуй, лучше софта не найти, большой функционал окуп за 0.00001сек @GlowCatcher

9 Feb 2025, 17:07 UTC216 viewsread 11 August 2026

Очень крутой , быстрый , а главное удобный для пользования ловец чеков @GlowCatcher

9 Feb 2025, 17:07 UTC211 viewsread 11 August 2026

Ахуенный софт, рекомендую, частые обновы - @GlowCatcher

8 Feb 2025, 19:39 UTC205 viewsread 11 August 2026

лучший софт на просторах телеграмма @GlowCatcher

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @GlowCatcherReviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,066,231 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Glow Catcher // Отзывы” (@GlowCatcherReviews), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GlowCatcherReviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.