Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

{ .. ่„‰ๆ, : โ€˜ obsidian rouge .. ๐˜ƒ }

@GloudEnt

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

100subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002527185651
TypeChannel
Username@GloudEnt
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GloudEnt

Growth

10013 Aug 2026, 04:03 โ€” 100 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 04:34 โ€” 100 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 04:0313 Aug 2026, 04:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 99โ€“101 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 04:34100no change
13 Aug 2026, 04:03100first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 March 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค8100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 March 2026 to 15 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Mar 2026, 03:50 UTC358 viewsread 13 August 2026

Yth. Seluruh Peserta Obsidian rouge. Kami memohon maaf yang sebesar-besarnya atas keterlambatan pengumuman Saat ini, tim kami masih dalam proses finalisasi data/evaluasi mendalam guna memastikan hasil yang akurat dan adil bagi seluruh pihak. Juga dikarenakan akun Founder Obsidian rouge tiba tiba saja deak dan seluruh link editan dan untuk pengumuman hanya dimiliki oleh sang Founder dan saat ini team Obsidian rougeโ€ฆ

11 Mar 2026, 09:37 UTC254 viewsread 13 August 2026

๐Ÿง‰. haii guys js info dl hariini yaa jam 18.00 seperti biasaa bagi yg belum silahkan kerjakan yaa

10 Mar 2026, 13:11 UTC220 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ใ…คใ…ค.. ็พŽไธฝ, : โ€˜ obsidian rouge: ๐–ค Est. 26'sโ€” task 04 .. ใ…คใ…คใ…คใ…ค..ใ…คใ…คใ…คใ…ค&ใ…คใ…คใ…คใ…ค.. ่ฐœ่ฏญ? โ”โ” Aku bukan panggung, tapi semua mata melihat ke arahku. Langkah demi langkah dipenuhi kilatan cahaya. Gaun indah dan jas rapi lewat di atasku. Warna ku selalu sama setiap acara besar. โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ ๐‘ฐ โ€ photoshoot tidak diperbolehkan dikirim sebelum menebak riddle. ๐‘ฐ๐‘ฐ โ€ photoshoot wajib hd โ€œ @EnhacneX_Botโ€ฆ

10 Mar 2026, 12:55 UTC307 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ใ…คใ…ค ใ…คใ…คใ…คโ€ฃ { ้บฅๅ…‹ } โ€” ยท ๐ŸŽฅ ใ…คใ…ค๐Œ๐€๐’๐“๐„๐‘ ๐Ž๐… ๐‚๐„๐‘๐„๐Œ๐Ž๐๐˜. ๅถๅƒ, /888+ : /take a few steps forward; read the text briefly; smile at the audience โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ ใ…ค๐ŸŽ™ dengan demikian, berakhirlah pengumuman Top 1 hingga Top 5 pada malam hari ini. Selamat kepada para trainee yang berhasil meraih posisi terbaik, dan terima kasih kepada seluruh trainee yang telah berpartisipasi serta menunjukkan usaha terbaiknya. ใ…ค๐ŸŽ™ Semoga pโ€ฆ

โค3

10 Mar 2026, 12:55 UTC290 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

๐˜ƒ NILAI TRAINEE OBSIDIAN ๐˜ƒ ็พŽไธฝ ๐๐€๐’๐„ ๐”๐๐’๐Ž๐‹๐•๐„๐ƒ 1. Puista DiabuโŒ 2. Shittaa Myland Carissa Winova โŒ 3. Diphylleia Grayi : 223 4. Nayesha ArendaratuโŒ 5. Jeandra Arkaseno Darmawan : 217 6. Ayinara Sabina : 240๐Ÿฅ‡ 7. Fairysรฉ Iris VileysaโŒ 8. Madison BradburyโŒ 9. Zhang Junjie Yongrui Zixuan : 234๐Ÿฅ‰ 10. Bianca Elise HartmannโŒ 11. Sereine Chrystal Lourencia : 236๐Ÿฅˆ 12. Svanhild Siฤ“nna OriettรจโŒ 13. Blรคde Sechรคlyn D'LuzโŒ 14. Jeyyaโ€ฆ

โค1

10 Mar 2026, 12:54 UTC281 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ใ…คใ…ค ๅ† ่ป : โ€˜ โ€” 1th place. ๐Ÿฅ‡ ใ…คโ€˜ ้ป‘ๆš—, /000+ : di antara banyaknya cahaya yang tertangkap dalam satu bingkai ๐Ÿ”‘ / .. +44 : ada satu nama yang bersinar lebih terang .. ๐–ฃฆ โ€™ โ€”sebuah nama yang berhasil mengubah setiap jepretan menjadi karya yang tak terlupakan. ๐€๐˜๐ˆ๐๐€๐‘๐€ ๐’๐€๐๐ˆ๐๐€ { 240 } โ€ฃ ยท ๆœ€ไฝณ โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€

โค1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GloudEnt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 1,119,810 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ{ .. ่„‰ๆ, : โ€˜ obsidian rouge .. ๐˜ƒ }โ€ (@GloudEnt), 100 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GloudEnt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.