Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Гладкова не нарочно

Channel

Гладкова не нарочно

@Gladkova_pro_PR

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

278subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003079966788
TypeChannel
Username@Gladkova_pro_PR
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Gladkova_pro_PR

Growth

275278276.57 August 2026 — 275 subscribers8 August 2026 — 275 subscribers16 August 2026 — 278 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 275–278 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:07278+3
8 Aug 2026, 08:45275no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:06275first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 7 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

463 reactions across 6 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23250.1%
🔥8317.9%
🥰367.78%
❤‍🔥214.54%
🍓194.10%
🍾194.10%
👏81.73%
😁71.51%
👍61.30%
51.08%
🎄51.08%
💋51.08%
😍40.864%
💘30.648%
🆒20.432%
💩20.432%
🌚10.216%
😨10.216%
🙏10.216%
🤔10.216%
2 further kinds20.432%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 463reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 7 November 2025 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Mar 2026, 08:15 UTC811 views66 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ничего не планировала писать к 8 марту. К датам я отношусь как к поводу для срочных постов — обычно это плохой повод Но тут в ленте выскочил пост Кати Егошиной. И я подписалась под каждым словом. Тот случай, когда за меня всё сказали Катя написала, что по-настоящему счастлива, потому что ни одно её серьёзное решение в жизни не определялось тем, что она женщина Ни карьерные повороты, ни смена городов, ни выбор мужч

38❤‍🔥10🥰8🍾4💋3🔥2👍1

10 Feb 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,310 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, а у нас, кажется, объявили внеплановые коммуникационные учения. Всеобщая диванная мобилизация. Паника уровня «Телеграм лег», но паника особая, экзистенциальная Страна, которая пережила блокировку запретграмов, вновь оказалась на перепутье: куда переходить, если вдруг? Одни срочно зовут в МАХ (это который «как Телеграм, но с родиной»). Другие предлагают вернуться в ВК, где всех ждут старые-добрые демотиватор

31🔥16👍4😁4💩1🫡1

31 Dec 2025, 13:12 UTC≈1,140 views91 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Год, который невозможно подвести. Никаких итогов, только инвентаризация Друзья, в этом посте есть мат. Если вас это может ранить, пожалуйста, не читайте то, что спрятано под скрытым текстом Работать без плана А Когда нет ни «плана А», ни «плана Б», включается самый честный режим — «херачить», а паника приходит потом. Или не приходит Узнать людей заново Вчера — незнакомец. Сегодня — союзник, для которого помощь

45🍾15❤‍🔥11🥰10🎄5🔥3👏2

29 Nov 2025, 12:23 UTC≈3,190 views129 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как в один пост уместить жизнь? Четыре года назад я, без опыта работы в высшем образовании, пришла работать в Московский Политех Думала, что вот во всем быстро разберусь и кааак заживём. Как же больно было падать с высоты своих иллюзий) Первые месяцы я ходила на совещания с диктофоном, чтобы послушать часовые записи вечером (а часто и ночью) на второй раз, погуглить незнакомые слова/фамилии, составить список вопро

67🔥27🍓19👏6😍4💘3💩1🤮1

15 Nov 2025, 07:24 UTC≈1,100 views57 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мою жизнь качественно поменяли сертралин и современное искусство от @voguetattoo Это уже про коммуникацию с собой🌟

25🔥13🥰95😁3👍1🙏1

7 Nov 2025, 14:10 UTC≈1,310 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Искусство — это коммуникация со звездочкой. Или с подвохом Это форма диалога, которая обходит рациональные фильтры и с ноги бьёт в эмоции. Пожалуй, это самый мощный инструмент разговора с самим собой Мы с мужем сходили на «Последнее лето» в театр Наций. Билеты не могли достать почти два года. Так вот: этот спектакль не про красоту. Он про тотальную размотку клубка наших собственных непрожитых тем Я удивлена, что п

26🔥22🥰9💋2🆒2🌚1🤔1

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @Gladkova_pro_PR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,304,674 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гладкова не нарочно” (@Gladkova_pro_PR), 278 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gladkova_pro_PR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.