草台班子写的代码直接给你网页代码拖下来 @hwxc129 转发不带作者没家人
Signed 看么· (24小时服务)

Channel
@GitHubCN
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
626subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003141665185 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GitHubCN |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GitHubCN |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 626 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 631 | -14 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 645 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 646 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 646 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 55.6% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 22.2% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
草台班子写的代码直接给你网页代码拖下来 @hwxc129 转发不带作者没家人
Signed 看么· (24小时服务)
💱一篇关于 @trade 的文章报告 严重等级:🔴 高危 发现日期:2026年7月 影响范围:所有用户资金安全 & 全平台用户隐私 🔴 CRITICAL-1: GraphQL Introspection 未关闭 端点 https://swapgift.live/api/graphql/query 影响 攻击者获得完整的数据模型(User / SpinPool / SpinPoolEntry 等全部字段) CVSS 7.5 (High) 🔴 CRITICAL-2: 用户敏感信息批量泄露(通过 SpinPool entries) 已确认: 无需特殊权限即可通过 spinPool(id) 拉取所有历史池子的参与者数据 🔴 CRITICAL-3: User 类型暴露完整财务数据 User 类型的 Schema 包含详细的资金信息。尽管 user(id:) 查询报 422 (已做防护),但如果存在任何间接泄露路径(如通过 entri…
❤1
Signed 𝕁𝕒𝕪
⭐️有想法请留下回复↩️ 准备继续开源
Signed X
🤩甲方说 项目款➕15W美金
Signed X
👁️X能量剪切板 前端 VUE+miniapp 功能不多 1.首页 兑换 免费兑换和余额 2.订单页面 3.充值和我的页面 中文+英文 4.前端触感反馈 后端node 后台这些我就不多余介绍了 自己琢磨⭐️ 后台大家自行部署,二开请勿当自开发谢谢! 转发请备注原作者X 😀本源码属X开源,感谢各位技术支持 公益地址: TKSeETdDXQDmQMtDFjvf7Myj2KpRa4XKs7 感谢🙏支持
❤1👏1
Signed X - tt
马上发
❤2👍2👎1
Signed X - tt
X能量租赁👁️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed X - tt
👁️开不开你们说的算 投票超过100票 发布结果
Signed X - tt
https://t.me/GitHubCN/403
Signed X
👁️出一套能量劫持剪切板miniapp小程序 详细功能请联系查看演示 需要请联系 @mamae
Signed X
仿Telegram风格+iOS26液态玻璃
Signed X
👁️ X-IM 轻量即时通讯 开源版 聊天和该有的功能都有 开源版不具备语音电话 视频功能 源码不进行更多介绍了 当开源大家去而开 uniapp的 后台大家自行部署,二开请勿当开发谢谢! 转发请备注原作者GitHub X 😹 源码下载链接加入私密群链接🔗 https://t.me/+R6O6llKe35I0MGRh 😀本源码属Jay @jieocl 开源,感谢各位技术支持 公益地址: TKSeETdDXQDmQMtDFjvf7Myj2KpRa4XKs7 感谢🙏支持
❤1
Signed X
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @GitHubCN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
X能量租赁👁️
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 9 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,259,471 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@GitHubCN named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝔾𝕚𝕥ℍ𝕦𝕓 𝕏” (@GitHubCN), 626 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GitHubCN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.