Channel
@Girafle
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
61subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002246650778 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Girafle |
| Description | ХуЁжник https://vk.com/girafle ПРАЙС ЛИСТ КОМИШКИ https://t.me/giraflecomissions шалости: https://t.me/sklad_girafle |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Girafle |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 61 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 61 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
240 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 125 | 52.1% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 16.7% | |
| 🍓 | 36 | 15.0% | |
| 💘 | 10 | 4.17% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 3.33% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 2.92% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 2.50% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.25% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.833% | |
| custom 5213305508034783384 | 1 | 0.417% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.417% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.417% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 January 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#ANIM_Жирафля сижу работаю никого не трогаю заглядываю на ютюб, а там сюрприз И такое бывает,работаешь на одной студии, а проект аутсорсится из другой, а потом сценку которую им делала аж в трейлер вставили, приятно 😎😎😎
🤣7❤5💘1
#ANIM_Жирафля это было спонтанным приглашением на самом деле, я ожидала что угодно, но не fx . Ведь я не делала эффекты и даже курсы по ним ещё не проходила, хотя наверное мою задачу можно назвать fx лишь отчасти🤔 Я сделала вспышку✨✨✨каста заклинания и грибочки 🌟🌟🌟
🔥4❤3
🎆🎆🎆 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ng2PDBOTHk йооо чек зис аут 🎆🎆🎆 это был очередной шорт фильм проект анимейшн скул и по случайности пришлось поволотёрить там в одной сценке буквально, зато как балдёжно себя чувствовать частью ахуенно прекрасного
❤5🔥4
🔤🔤🔤 Мне конечно говорили, что анимация, это дело такое, ты либо сидишь на безрыбьи и ждёшь у моря погоды, ЛИБО ПРОЕКТОВ НАВАЛИВАЕТ СТОЛЬКО ЧТО ОГОСПАДИХТЫЖБЛТЬБ. 😩 И от всего просто ну язык не поворачивается отказаться, ведь всё такое крутое и даёт money💸. Со мной такое впервые, и это своего рода конечно балдёж как круто ведь я начинаю чувствовать себя кем то в профессии. На самом деле это крайне неудачное стечение…
❤11🌚3
Если кто то ещё помнит про моё существование, вот Лотерейный 😇 спустя 3 месяца почти
🍓21❤2
А вот и комишка 🍉🍉🍉 Такая вот незамысловатая, но прикольная штучка 🥴
❤19🔥3🤔1
КСТАТИ ЕСТЬ СМИЩНОЙ ТИКТОК там с картинкой ливси таймлапсик , для тех кому интересно
❤9👍1🔥1
Если кстати думаете что я уйду из тг, в связи с замедлениями, можете не переживать. Сидим на впновой игле, да и не могу я, у меня работа тут вся. Пусть ркн сосут бибу жоска
💜С ДНЁМ ВАЛЕНТИНА💜 ВОТ ВАМ ДОКТОР ЛИВСИ СЕКСУАЛЫЧ отпахала первый проект на студии, и в передышке берусь за свои планы и долги, которые брала до устройства, ща как доделаю комишку, а потом возьмусь за ваши презенты
❤14🥰6
💥НУ ВОТ И СЧАСТЛИВЧИКИ!💥 а поскольку число участников не добралось даже до 10, я ограничилась 2мя победителями, а то ну уж совсем какая то ультра халява была бы, будь вас 3 ____ Всем пасибо за участие, кто знает, может всё таки проведу лоту ещё раз, когда людей будет больше🤷♀️
🔥13🍓1
🤬 🤬🤬 При всём том факте, что я не ожидала большого прироста актива от лотереи в принципе, вы всё равно умудряетесь переплюнуть эти ожидания. Это тот ещё прикол, когда на 50 человек лишь 5.. 🔥5 МАТЬ ЕГО 🔥выполняют условия я шла в телегу, ожидая относительно активных подписчиков, и с одной стороны по числу просмотров и реакций оно как бы ДА, но в то же время НЕТ. На диалог идут единицы. И то часть из них я знаю чуть л…
❤9🍓2custom 52133055080347833841
КТО НЕ ПОСМОТРИТ ,ТОТ ЛОХ Там я сделала вроде как смешнявый видосик с таймлапсом🍴 А ещё это толстый намёк что будет вашим контентом в близжайшее время. Пральна. Фанарты. 🍴
❤13❤🔥4🍓3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Girafle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 294,093 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GIRAFLE” (@Girafle), 61 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Girafle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.