Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝔾𝕙𝕚𝕓𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕜 𝔸𝕘𝕔🌱

@GhiblinkOFC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

54subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002360937457
TypeChannel
Username@GhiblinkOFC
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GhiblinkOFC

Growth

5412 Aug 2026, 14:16 — 54 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 10:33 — 54 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 14:1613 Aug 2026, 10:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:3354no change
12 Aug 2026, 14:1654first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
583.3%
❤‍🔥116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 12 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2025, 10:33 UTCviews —

𝔾𝕙𝕚𝕓𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕜 𝔸𝕘𝕔🌱 pinned «https://t.me/Hasungje_gf»

12 Sept 2025, 10:33 UTC184 viewsread 12 August 2026

Untuk sementara poster saya hapus y anak - anak, soalnya beberapa bot itu ga bisa di pakai, saya kurang tau masalah nya apa sampai ga bisa di gunakan.

6 Sept 2025, 06:02 UTC97 viewsread 12 August 2026

────୨ৎ──── ᴴⁱ ᵉᵛᵉʳʸᵒⁿᵉ! ᴸᵉᵗ ᵐᵉ ⁱⁿᵗʳᵒᵈᵘᶜᵉ ᵐʸˢᵉˡᶠ ᵗᵒ ᵃˡˡ ᴵ ᵃᵐ ᴶᵉᵉˡⁱʸᵗᵃ ᶜᵃˢˢᵃᵖᵒⁱᵉᵉⁿᵃ ʸᵒᵘ ᶜᵃⁿ ᶜᵃˡˡ ᵐᵉ ʲᵉˡⁱ ᵒʳ ᵗⁱᵗᵃ ᶠᵒʳ ᵗʰᵉ ⁿᵃᵐᵉ ᵗⁱᵗᵃ ⁱᵗˢᵉˡᶠ ʰᵃˢ ᵃ ᵛᵃˡᵘᵃᵇˡᵉ ⁱᵐᵖʳᵉˢˢⁱᵒⁿ ᶠᵒʳ ᵐᵉ ᵗᵒ ᶜᵃˡˡ ⁱᵗ ᵐᵃᵏᵉˢ ᵐᵉ ᶜᵒᵐᶠᵒʳᵗᵃᵇˡᵉ ˗ˏˋ 𝐕𝐎𝐋. 𝐈 ˎˊ˗ 𓏲⋆📗. і vᥱrႸ ɡr⍺tᥱ𝖿uᥣ t𝘰 𝖦hіbᥣіnk Aɡеncу @GhiblinkOFC 𝖿𝘰r 𝖽ᥱᖯutіᥒɡ 𝗆ᥱ 𝘰ᥒ 𝖦ᥱᥒ 02 ⍺ᥒ𝖽 j𝘰іᥒ ρꪮꪀꪗꪮ tᥱ⍺𝗆 ⍺ᥒ𝖽 ᖯᥱіᥒɡ⍺ᖯᥣᥱ t𝘰 ᥣᥱ⍺rᥒ 𝗆𝘰rᥱ ⍺ᖯ𝘰ut 𝗆𝘰𝖽ᥱᥣіᥒɡ ⍺ᥒ𝖽 I rᥱ⍺ᥣᥣႸ th⍺ᥒk thᥱ 𝘴t⍺𝖿𝖿 wh𝘰 h⍺vᥱ w𝘰rkᥱ𝖽 h⍺r𝖽. і h𝘰рᥱ

6 Sept 2025, 06:02 UTC68 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

INTRODUCTION PAGE 01 Hello Everyone, I am Elizza Vega Narkheasha , you can call me Elizza or Asha, and I am using Esther yu or Yu shuxin as my main muse and IU, Dilraba Dilmurat, Kazuha as my alternatif muse. PAGE 02 I am the part of @GhiblinkOFC and I debuted in a group call VENUS. Big thanks for @GhiblinkOFC to allowing me became a model. PAGE 03 I like something looks elegant and also music, I like kpop but

6 Sept 2025, 06:02 UTC71 viewsread 12 August 2026

ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ‘Thus, Modeling──II. 到期 Seoul, Fashion: 2009. Session|Photoshoot, 2024 's. 📷 ⠀۪ 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗣𝗧𝗘𝗥. 𝗜 ⊹ Hello everyone there! Let me introduce myself, my name is Shayuu Haraiine or you can call me Shayuu. Saya berulang tahun pada tanggal 19 bulan 02. dan 𝘑𝘢𝘯𝘨 𝘞𝘰𝘯𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘨 adalah Muse yang saya gunakan sebagai Muse Utama. 📸 ⠀۪ 𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗣𝗧𝗘𝗥. 𝗜𝗜 ⊹ Saya juga memiliki hobi dan musik favorite saya, My hobby is 𝘞𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 ✏️, writing anythi

6 Sept 2025, 06:02 UTC82 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

. ┅┅┅▓ೋ❁ཻ‌֯⸙ೋ▓┅┅┅ ɪɴᴛʀᴏᴅᴜᴄᴛɪᴏɴ . ┅┅┅▓ೋ❁ཻ‌֯⸙ೋ▓┅┅┅ 𝐈. 𝒑𝒂𝒈𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝓬𝓱𝓲𝓸𝓷é ˚ ༘ ♡ ⋆。˚ Nǐ hǎo 🙇‍♀🙇‍♀ My name is Erianthe C. Khioné and you can call me Chioné or "cah ayu" or you can just call me as comfortable as you like 𓄹𓈒 👩🏻‍🌾🧠 ˖ ࣪. 𝐈𝐈. 𝒘𝒉𝒐 𝒊𝒔 𝓬𝓱𝓲𝓸𝓷é ♡. . I'm Chioné and i'm just a girl. I am a Aries girl who like challenging things. I am ISTJ. The

1

6 Sept 2025, 06:02 UTC111 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

beauty, olivia ’s ౨ৎ (’video finished with beautiful.) first the beauty🪽 ( ࣪ ִֶָ☾. ) Lemme introduce my self:b. 𓂃⋆.˚ Page 01; —• Hellour everyone🙌🏻, nice too meet you all. My name is Olivia Hollis. Many people call me like olip, liplip, ol, lia, lipi, And many more. —• I used Kim Minji as my main character😉. —• A little about me, I like writing, Listening to songs, reading. And I also like rai

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GhiblinkOFC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 606,568 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝔾𝕙𝕚𝕓𝕝𝕚𝕟𝕜 𝔸𝕘𝕔🌱” (@GhiblinkOFC), 54 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GhiblinkOFC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.