Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

✨ GHALIOR PARIS ✨

@Ghalior_Paris

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

387subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001876298870
TypeChannel
Username@Ghalior_Paris
DescriptionОфициальный канал Ghali’or Paris и премиум-брендов из Великобритании, Турции, Египта и Франции. НАШИ БРЕНДЫ: ☑️ Ghali’or Paris 🇫🇷 ☑️ Dos Lunas 🇬🇧 ☑️ Shaik / Clive&Keira / Sevaverek 🇹🇷 ☑️ WARITEX 🇪🇬 По вопросам приобретения продукции: +7(925)773-16-92
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Ghalior_Paris

Growth

3877 Aug 2026, 18:08 — 387 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:03 — 387 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:088 Aug 2026, 06:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 386–388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:03387no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:08387first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.51%
avg views ÷ 387 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.1
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
24.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held14 (20 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total407
Reactions total101
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
926
Videos
192
Links
271

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

101 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3635.6%
🔥2322.8%
👍1211.9%
💯1211.9%
🤩76.93%
custom 534367220514844160732.97%
😁32.97%
👌21.98%
🤣21.98%
🤝10.99%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 101reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Ghalior_Paris. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC14 views3 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Да… непросто нам, девочкам, жить в этом постоянно искушающем мире. То новая помада красивая. То тушь по акции. То румяна такого оттенка, которого у нас, разумеется, ещё нет. 😅 И приходится постоянно себе в чём-то отказывать. А это, между прочим, плохо сказывается на ментальном здоровье! Нам оно надо? Не надо. 😂 Поэтому сегодня предлагаем борьбу с собой отменить, руки себе развязать и идти уже на WB себя радоват

💯1🔥1🤣1

6 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC16 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ ВЕРДИКТ ПО ДЕЛУ №003 Суд изучил материалы дела и постановил: Сам по себе макияж, который сильно меняет внешность, преступлением не является. Если клиентка смотрит в зеркало, не узнаёт себя и при этом думает: «БОЖЕ, Я ШИКАРНАЯ!» — значит, визажист всё сделал правильно. Оправдан! 😍 Но если из зеркала смотрит красивая незнакомка, а внутри только одно ощущение: будто на Вас надели эффектную маску, а саму Вас спрят

💯2👍1

5 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC18 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ БЬЮТИ-СУД. ДЕЛО №003 Визажист сделал всё красиво. Но в зеркале — вообще не Вы. Тон идеальный. Стрелки ровные. Скулы появились даже там, где раньше их никто не видел. Вроде бы придраться не к чему… Кроме одной мелочи: из зеркала на Вас смотрит очень эффектная, безупречно накрашенная, но мало похожая на Вас женщина. 🫣 И вот тут мнения расходятся. Сторона обвинения: хороший визажист должен подчёркивать внешност

3🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 06:35 UTC24 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Друзья, сегодня будет не совсем брендовый контент. Сегодня будет прям личная рекомендация. Потому что эти румяна — моё личное открытие 2025 года, которое благополучно перекочевало в 2026-й. И без них не обходится ни один мой макияж. У меня оттенок №4 (обожаю!). Использую ещё и в качестве теней☝🏼 Стойкость — топ! Наслаиваются божественно! Из минусов могу сказать только то, что они чуть пылят при наборе на кисть. Н

🔥4👍3👌21custom 53436722051484416071

3 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC25 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Август, конечно, красавчик! Молча пришёл и за одни выходные показал, кто тут батя и как вообще должно выглядеть лето 🔥☀️ Предлагаем брать пример😉. Приходить — и сразу заполнять всё пространство своей красотой, энергией и отличным настроением. А Ghali’or Paris обязательно поможет произвести нужный эффект 💄 .

5💯2🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 06:10 UTC36 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мудрость дня: Мужчинам следовало бы перестать считать нас транжирами и быть куда более благодарными😌 Ведь они даже не представляют, сколько товаров в наших корзинах на маркетплейсах остаётся невыкупленными… А это уже не транжирство. Это огромная экономия семейного бюджета. Так-то! 😂

4💯4😁3🤣1

30 Jul 2026, 06:05 UTC37 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня без сложных бьюти-разборов. Просто напоминаем: жизнь слишком коротка, чтобы беречь красивую помаду «на особый случай». Особый случай — Вы проснулись. Всё. 💄 Ghali’or Paris эту позицию полностью поддерживает.

6💯1

28 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTC39 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

ДЕВОЧКИ!!! Там это… на WB ЧЁ ТВОРИТСЯ 😳 В общем, всем туда. СРОЧНО. 😂 Мы зашли посмотреть цены в АромаШик и немножко зависли. Потому что сейчас там огромные скидки почти на всё! Любимые туши, наши крутейшие тинты и блески, пудры, помады от Ghali’or Paris, классные мочалки от Waritex, уход для волос от Dos Lunas и ещё куча всего — цены местами такие, что хочется сначала положить в корзину, а уже потом разбираться,

🔥4👍2🤩21

27 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC32 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Привет, красивые! ♥ Давайте на чистоту. У каждого из нас есть каналы, на которые мы когда-то подписались… и с тех пор они просто живут в списке. Как дальняя родственница в друзьях: вроде удалять неудобно, но и желания знать подробности её жизни особо не возникает 🫣 Мы очень не хотим стать таким каналом. Нам вообще нравится другая схема. Чтобы вы открывали пост не потому, что «ну это же косметика, надо посмотрет

5🔥2🤩2

24 Jul 2026, 07:09 UTC31 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Привет, красивые… У нас сегодня случилось небольшое экзистенциальное потрясение🫣. Сначала мы такие: «Ну наконец-то пятница!», а потом взгляд падает на календарь… 24 июля… ЧЕГОООООО БЛИН??? 😳 Такое ощущение, что 2/3 лета мы все дружно куда-то бежали. Работали, решали вопросы, что-то откладывали «на выходных», «на следующей неделе»… А лето в это время просто шло. Поэтому есть предложение! Давайте хотя бы конец ию

👍3💯21🤝1

23 Jul 2026, 08:10 UTC37 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⚖️ БЬЮТИ-СУД: ВЕРДИКТ ПО ДЕЛУ №002 На скамье подсудимых оказалось утверждение: «Нельзя спать с макияжем даже один раз». Суд изучил материалы дела и постановил: частично виновно в излишней драматизации. Если однажды Вы уснули с макияжем, кожа не состарится за ночь на десять лет, поры не закроются навсегда, а ресницы не подадут заявление на увольнение. Но защита тоже не смогла полностью оправдать подсудимого. Пок

🔥31🤩1

22 Jul 2026, 07:47 UTC32 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Привет, красивые! Или, точнее, товарищи присяжные☝🏼. Сегодня мы снова открываем двери нашего Бьюти-суда ⚖️. Здесь мы разбираем популярные бьюти-утверждения, выслушиваем обвинение и защиту, а решение передаём вам😉. Ваша задача проста: изучить материалы дела и проголосовать реакцией. А завтра мы вернёмся с фактами и вынесем окончательный вердикт. Всем встать, суд идёт. 😌 ⚖️ БЬЮТИ-СУД Дело №002 Обвиняемый: «Нельзя

4🔥4

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Ghalior_Paris. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 774,287 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✨ GHALIOR PARIS ✨” (@Ghalior_Paris), 387 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ghalior_Paris.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.