11 measurements spanning 23 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 300–311 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
29 Aug 2026, 23:35
307
-1
28 Aug 2026, 17:23
308
-1
27 Aug 2026, 05:19
309
-1
22 Aug 2026, 13:43
310
+1
21 Aug 2026, 23:45
309
+1
20 Aug 2026, 08:47
308
+6
15 Aug 2026, 18:55
302
+1
13 Aug 2026, 14:49
301
no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:01
301
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:25
301
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:46
301
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 22 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
99.2%
avg views ÷ 307 subscribers
Avg views / post
305
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.821%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
22 (22 April 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
1,218
Reactions total
10
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
25 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
13
52.0%
👍
7
28.0%
✍
5
20.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Geotraffik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 April 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🟪🟪🟪🟪 добавил Яндекс Сплит. Покупки в рассрочку становятся новым стандартом?
На Авито появилась возможность оплачивать товары через Яндекс Сплит - теперь пользователи могут разбивать стоимость покупки на несколько платежей вместо полной оплаты сразу.
И это очередной шаг Авито в сторону превращения площадки не просто в место для объявлений, а в полноценную торговую экосистему 💵
Как это работает?
🔵 пользователь выбир…
🟪🟪🟪🟪 запустил таргетинг по ключевым словам. Яндекс Директ внутри Авито?
🔥 Авито Реклама выкатила новый инструмент — теперь рекламодатели смогут показывать рекламу пользователям на основе того, что те вводили в поисковой строке площадки.
И вот это уже действительно интересное обновление 🧐
Авито ежедневно обрабатывает около 73 млн поисковых запросов, а значит, прекрасно понимает, что человек прямо сейчас хочет купить…
Что такое Авито Pro? Кому нужен? Для кого будет полезен?
В рекламном кабинете Авито Pro можно выбрать и применить различные стратегии продвижения объявлений и отслеживать статистику ✏️
‼️ Важно помнить главное: Авито Pro - это продвижение только объявлений внутри площадки.
Возможности Авито Pro:
🔵 Планирование услуги продвижения - выбирать дату и время продвижения;
🔵 Отслеживание интерес пользователей - как част…
Кто партнеры Авито, так называемые "эксперты", речь о которых шла в этом посте 🫵
Ответ - кто попало‼️ Сурово, но правда.
Внимательно изучив бОльшую часть из них, я пришел к выводу, что это просто люди, которые ведут какие-то блоги, посвященные Авито, либо - агентства, специализирующиеся на продвижении на этой площадке. Проще говоря - это те, кто пиарит Авито за свой счет, вот и вся суть и логика.
Большинство из ни…
Авито запустил услугу, в рамках которой предприниматели могут бесплатно получить в помощь эксперта по продвижению на площадке на месяц.
Специалист изучает задачи бизнеса и выстраивает индивидуальную стратегию продаж. По итогам месяца продавец получает полностью оформленный профиль — с описанием, дизайном и до 100 опубликованными объявлениями.
Отдельно настраивается файл автозагрузки, который позволяет размещать сра…
🆕 Авито Подработка запустила инструмент, который помогает бизнесу стабильнее закрывать смены
Платформа присваивает каждому исполнителю один из трех уровней доступа к сменам: минимальный, базовый или расширенный, в зависимости от стабильности выходов и соблюдения правил сервиса.
Для компаний это означает меньше операционных сбоев и более предсказуемую работу с временным персоналом, особенно в сегментах массового при…
Подъехали разъяснения для всех радеющих за Авито и новые знакомства 🌩
Верификация будет проходить через «Госуслуги» в том числе.
Новый сервис планируют сделать бесплатным. Главным отличием от конкурентов будет безопасность. Авито сделает обязательную проверку профилей, защиту от ботов и фейковых анкет. Также в сервис добавят рекомендательные технологии, которые компания развивает для основного каталога объявлений.
…
📢 Авито превратится в Tinder
Компания планирует запустить собственный дейтинг-сервис внутри приложения с объявлениями, пишет «Коммерсантъ». По информации источников, новый раздел будет бесплатным, а в его основе окажется обновлённый алгоритм подбора пользователей и усиленные меры безопасности.
Новость интересная, пока непонятно только одно - как это скажется на монетазиции 🍀
@Geotraffik
Подготовил для своих любимых подписчиков объемную шпаргалку из 92 нейросетей - тут только действительно полезные сервисы, которые помогают в работе.
В списке нейронки под любые задачи: генерация картинок, аудио и видео контента, дизайн, презентации, SMM, анализ данных, точные науки и многое другое ✏️
@Geotraffik
⚡️ Telegram могут разблокировать в России вслед за Roblox, заявили в Госдуме
«К Telegram у Роскомнадзора и правительства требования не такие сложные. При наличии желания со стороны руководства платформы они сделают всё необходимое за 2–3 месяца», — отметил депутат Андрей Свинцов.
👀 Российские онлайн-платформы могут начать проверять возраст пользователей
Минцифры рассматривает введение возрастной идентификации на онлайн-платформах. «Этот вопрос точно перед нами встанет», — заявил глава ведомства. Такой механизм может понадобиться сервисам, где есть ограничения для пользователей младше 14 или 18 лет.
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Geotraffik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 370,608 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Авито | Князь в походе” (@Geotraffik), 307 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Geotraffik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.