Channel
@Geopolitika_pt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
781subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001607746648 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Geopolitika_pt |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Geopolitika_pt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:29 | 781 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:10 | 785 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 786 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 786 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,317 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
A essência do confronto entre a multipolaridade e a unipolaridade encontra-se num nível mais profundo do que uma simples diferença na distribuição do poder dentro da política internacional, e pode ser entendida como um confronto entre as próprias estruturas civilizacionais no que diz respeito à maneira como o aumento da entropia deve ser processado dentro da ordem social. ✍️ Kazuhiro Hayashida 🗣 Multipolaridade con…
Constantin von Hoffmeister sobre a eterna dialética entre o Katechon e o Anticristo da modernidade liberal. ✍️ Constantin von Hoffmeister 🗣 A guerra da Coreia como profecia multipolar
A premissa do que se segue é metodológica e política: se não aprendermos a raciocinar fazendo distinções, se continuarmos a presumir que a forma correta de debate é a oposição entre partes opostas, a qualidade do debate político continuará a se deteriorar. ✍️ Andrea Zhok 🗣 Reflexões sobre ecopatologia
O que aproxima dois poetas que viveram com um século de diferença, em lados opostos do mundo, escrevendo em idiomas distintos e sob diferentes formas de opressão? ✍️ Myra Saqib 🗣 Como Aleksandr Pushkin e Allama Iqbal se complementam
A Europa reage. A Europa sempre reage. Ela percebe a direção antes de nomeá-la. O movimento atual desloca-se para a esquerda, e a causa está claramente visível: a conduta de Donald Trump no conflito em escalada com o Irã. O que antes parecia uma revolta global anti-globalista contra a tirania liberal agora se assemelha à sua continuação mais agressiva. A máscara mudou. O monstro permanece e está fortalecido. ✍️ Cons…
Como já mencionamos nestas páginas, Gramsci concebia uma era de ambiguidade metafísica, na qual o antigo já estava morto, mas o novo ainda não havia nascido — um interregno no qual surgem monstros (Gramsci, 1971) ✍️ Santiago Mondéjar 🗣 Arquétipos como Formas Simbólicas: Navegando o Crepúsculo Metafísico
Não sou um convertido à pseudo-religião do ambientalismo. Não pretendo salvar o planeta comprando um carro elétrico, nem expiar os pecados da civilização industrial com uma bateria de lítio. No entanto, vejo com bons olhos a crescente rebelião nos Estados Unidos — o coração e o motor do Império — contra os centros de dados de alta tecnologia, hoje amplamente dedicados à inteligência artificial. ✍️ Roberto Pecchioli …
Considero a unipolaridade um mal. A unipolaridade é uma condição em que todo o mapa do mundo é pintado com uma única cor e um único centro determina a organização do mundo inteiro. Em tal condição, outras civilizações, Estados, povos e comunidades perdem seus centros independentes de julgamento e têm suas posições definidas de acordo com um único padrão. ✍️ Kazuhiro Hayashida 🗣 Um Mundo Multipolar Fundamentado na …
Colocar o mundo no próprio centro e rotular todas as demais regiões de acordo com sua distância desse centro é a forma mais refinada e perigosa de colonialismo. ✍️ Adnan DEMİR 🗣 A Inquisição Conceitual do Ocidente: Ilusão Linguística, Instituições e o Colonialismo do Consentimento
Liquidar o comportamento de Trump atribuindo-o a desorientação, frustração e exasperação ou diagnosticando uma doença mental sua seria banal e simplista. ✍️ Claudio Mutti 🗣 Trump é o Produto da Arrogância Ianque
Em junho, a China publicou um Livro Branco sobre governança global intitulado "Construindo um Sistema de Governança Global Mais Justo e Equitativo: Conceitos, Iniciativas e Ações da China". ✍️ Arabelle Boze 🗣 O Livro Branco da China
Os conflitos intensificados nos últimos anos — e, desde 2022, na Ucrânia-Rússia, na Palestina (e na região circundante, incluindo Israel, Líbano, Iêmen, Iraque e até Afeganistão e Paquistão), na Venezuela, no Irã, bem como em países sujeitos a sanções unilaterais — constituem batalhas distintas, mas interconectadas. ✍️ Martín Martinelli 🗣 O que está em jogo na guerra entre os Estados Unidos, Israel e o Irã?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Geopolitika_pt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 704,703 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@Geopolitika_pt named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Geopolitika.ru em Português” (@Geopolitika_pt), 781 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Geopolitika_pt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.