Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GFC | Gentleman Fight Club

Channel

GFC | Gentleman Fight Club

@GentlemanFC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

969subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001199464049
TypeChannel
Username@GentlemanFC
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GentlemanFC

Growth

9699819758 August 2026 — 981 subscribers8 August 2026 — 980 subscribers16 August 2026 — 976 subscribers25 August 2026 — 970 subscribers31 August 2026 — 969 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 967–983 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 17:11969-1
25 Aug 2026, 00:05970-6
16 Aug 2026, 18:59976-4
8 Aug 2026, 14:01980-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:00981first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 16s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

106 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3129.2%
3028.3%
👍1817.0%
👏1817.0%
🤯43.77%
🏆32.83%
❤‍🔥21.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTC462 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏆ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ НОМИНАЦИИ - «ТРЭШТОКЕР ГОДА» Руял «Азкур» Гусейнов набрал наибольшее число зрительских голосов, превзойдя в конкурентной гонке своих оппонентов. Дерзость, уверенность в себе и, разумеется, зрелищные бои — вот что сделало Руяла любимцем публики.

🔥8👏2❤‍🔥1👍1

13 Jun 2026, 11:13 UTC333 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏆ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ НОМИНАЦИИ - «ОТКРЫТИЕ ГОДА» Ниджат «Никогаз» Джафаров громко ворвался в нашу лигу и сразу же полюбился зрителям. Ниджат ярко провёл свой дебютный поединок: шёл вперёд и закатывал яркую рубку, поэтому полностью заслуженно стал победителем этой номинации.

👏8👍1🔥1

11 Jun 2026, 18:08 UTC274 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏆ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ НОМИНАЦИИ - «БОЕЦ ГОДА» Нарт «Опасный» Бжембахов (3-0) чемпион в весе до 85 кг, завершивший все 3 боя нокаутом. Нарт набрал наибольшее число зрительских голосов, тем самым безоговорочно став лучшим бойцом года.

12🔥3❤‍🔥1🏆1👍1

10 Jun 2026, 06:46 UTC282 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏆ПОБЕДИТЕЛИ НОМИНАЦИИ - «БОЙ ГОДА» Хазратбек «Воин» Нематжонов VS Турпал «Форвард» Закриев. Эти гладиаторы набрали наибольшее число голосов, устроив самую настоящую рубку в лучших традициях кулачных боёв.

👍82🔥2

8 Jun 2026, 17:35 UTC≈1,020 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏆ПОБЕДИТЕЛЬ НОМИНАЦИИ - «НОКАУТ ГОДА» Дмитрий «Цыган» Федоренко (3-0) набрал большее число зрительских голосов, превзойдя в эпичной гонке своих конкурентов и победив в одной из самых зрелищных номинаций.

🔥72👏2

28 May 2026, 06:35 UTC≈1,110 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

НОКАУТ ГОДА 🔥

  1. 1. Нарт «Опасный» Бжембахов7%
  2. 2. Захар «Зима» Зимин6%
  3. 3. Шохиджон «Шах» Толибов55%
  4. 4. Дмитрий «Цыган» Федоренко57%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9👍2

28 May 2026, 06:35 UTC399 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

❗️ ЗАПУСКАЕМ ПЕРЕГОЛОСОВАНИЕ ❗️ В связи с накруткой голосов в номинации «ЛУЧШИЙ НОКАУТ ГОДА» результаты голосования обнуляются и проводится перевыбор победителя. Голосование уже доступно ниже, переходи и голосуй! 👇 ⚠️ Номинанты, которые подозреваются в накрутке голосов, будут сняты с голосования в итоге.

👍51

26 May 2026, 06:23 UTC358 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

⬆️ НАПОМИНАЕМ, ЧТО У НАС ИДЁТ ГОЛОСОВАНИЕ НА ЛУЧШЕГО ТРЭШТОКЕРА ГОДА👊 Голосуй за своего любимого бойца, и возможно именно твой голос станет решающим 🔥

🤯42🔥2

20 May 2026, 13:01 UTC626 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

ЛУЧШИЙ ТРЭШТОКЕР 🤯

  1. 1. Руял «Азкур» Гусейнов69%
  2. 2. Адам «Богал» Хубецов13%
  3. 3. Магомед «Танк» Керимов12%
  4. 4. Карим «Повар» Магомедэминов22%
  5. 5. Байрам Шахмурадов6%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥72👏1

20 May 2026, 13:01 UTC384 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🏆 КАКОЙ БОЕЦ, ПО ВАШЕМУ МНЕНИЮ, ЗАСЛУЖИВАЕТ ЗВАНИЕ ЛУЧШЕГО ТРЭШТОКЕРА ГОДА? Голосование уже доступно ниже, переходи и голосуй! 👇 ⚠️ Номинанты, которые подозреваются в накрутке голосов, будут сняты с голосования в итоге.

👏5🏆2🔥1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @GentlemanFC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 May 2026, 06:35 UTCFinal Results181 voters

НОКАУТ ГОДА 🔥

  1. 1. Нарт «Опасный» Бжембахов7%
  2. 2. Захар «Зима» Зимин6%
  3. 3. Шохиджон «Шах» Толибов55%
  4. 4. Дмитрий «Цыган» Федоренко57%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 May 2026, 13:01 UTCFinal Results67 voters

ЛУЧШИЙ ТРЭШТОКЕР 🤯

  1. 1. Руял «Азкур» Гусейнов69%
  2. 2. Адам «Богал» Хубецов13%
  3. 3. Магомед «Танк» Керимов12%
  4. 4. Карим «Повар» Магомедэминов22%
  5. 5. Байрам Шахмурадов6%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 14 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GFC | Gentleman Fight Club” (@GentlemanFC), 969 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GentlemanFC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.