Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

GENERAL'S WAR ROOM πŸš€

@GeneralsCryptoCalls

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

977subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001715491472
TypeChannel
Username@GeneralsCryptoCalls
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GeneralsCryptoCalls

Growth

9779799787 Aug 2026, 04:46 β€” 979 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:52 β€” 977 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:468 Aug 2026, 04:52
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 977–979 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:52977-2
7 Aug 2026, 04:46979first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 December 2024 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘923.1%
πŸ”₯923.1%
❀820.5%
πŸ‘37.69%
😁37.69%
🐳25.13%
πŸ₯°25.13%
πŸ€ͺ12.56%
🀯12.56%
πŸ₯΄12.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 December 2024 to 19 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jan 2026, 11:29 UTC258 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

$OIL broke $2m mc πŸ”₯πŸš€ Team are grinding. Solid 6x so far and counting πŸ‘€ https://dexscreener.com/solana/6FgPuEv5gNiHCTJqQeWiY6vu79fuSSqYJkHrpdompump

πŸ‘1πŸ”₯1

16 Jan 2026, 18:23 UTC261 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

OIL Buy! πŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈπŸ›’οΈ πŸ”€ Spent $646.25 (4.518 SOL) πŸ”€ Got 499,305 OIL πŸ‘€ Buyer / TX πŸͺ™ Position +1000% πŸ’Έ Market Cap $1,275,591 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending ⏺ #13 On SOL Trending πŸ”₯

πŸ”₯2🀯1

15 Jan 2026, 17:53 UTC232 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Been out of the trenches for almost a year… now I’m back. First play I grabbed is $OIL πŸ›’οΈ The @oilmeme_ team is absolutely top notch. Kicking off my return with a BANG. Millions loading. πŸš€ https://dexscreener.com/solana/6FgPuEv5gNiHCTJqQeWiY6vu79fuSSqYJkHrpdompump

πŸ‘2❀1

18 Jan 2025, 13:09 UTC869 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Just FOMO into $TRUMP πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ Get ready to buy the dip 🀣🀣

❀1😁1

1 Jan 2025, 00:18 UTC887 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Happy New Year legends......🀝πŸ₯‚ 2025 will be our Year LFG πŸ”₯

❀3🐳1😁1

31 Dec 2024, 16:54 UTC870 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Chiba Buy! πŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒπŸ˜ƒ πŸ”€ Spent $851.35 (0.25 ETH) πŸ”€ Got 117,887,207 CHIB πŸ‘€ Buyer / TX πŸͺ™ New Holder πŸ’Έ Market Cap $1,452,894 DexT | Screener | Buy | Trending

πŸ‘1

26 Dec 2024, 12:29 UTC995 viewsread 7 August 2026

Big push starting today from the $BFF420 team. If your not already in, take a position and enjoy the ride πŸ”₯πŸš€ http://t.me/BFF420_ERC20

25 Dec 2024, 00:13 UTC570 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Merry Christmas πŸŽ… Enjoy the holidays 🀝

❀3πŸ‘2πŸ₯°2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GeneralsCryptoCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œGENERAL'S WAR ROOM πŸš€β€ (@GeneralsCryptoCalls), 977 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GeneralsCryptoCalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.