Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Псих-диспансер

@GeneralniyShtabChR

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

184subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002037240534
TypeChannel
Username@GeneralniyShtabChR
DescriptionКолебаться надо при выборе цели А когда цель выбрана надо просто действовать…
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/GeneralniyShtabChR

Growth

1847 Aug 2026, 13:31 — 184 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:30 — 184 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:318 Aug 2026, 12:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 183–185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 12:30184no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:31184first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 5 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
106
Videos
137
Links
463

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 09s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯725.0%
😁725.0%
😡517.9%
🤣310.7%
👏27.14%
🤯27.14%
👌13.57%
👍13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2025 to 8 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Mar 2025, 22:33 UTC417 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Два лгбтшника они целовались на камеру так боюсь представить что было без камер 🤣🤣🤣 главы государства лгбтшники лгбтшники представляют их народы перед всем миром значит из народы не против значит и они такие же латентные педики 🤣🤣

😁5

6 Mar 2025, 13:51 UTC360 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ясир Арафат целует в лоб своего российского коллегу Бориса Ельцина. 1997 год Было и такое) Сколько нежности.

😡5

4 Mar 2025, 03:21 UTC354 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот как мусульмане арабы желают того что бы Путин стал мусульманином 🤔😁

🤯2😁2

27 Feb 2025, 23:52 UTC311 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Война между Луной и Солнцем, между Тьмой и Светом Это история, которую хотят забыть все, кроме родноверов, таких как мы. С этого момента начался переломный этап для всего Кавказа — время нескончаемых войн, смертей, нашествий, кража женщин, детей, завоеваний и последующих освободительных сражений. Для нас эта война была не просто столкновением армий. Это была борьба за веру, за расу, за Отечество. Абу Мухаммад Ахма

👍1

23 Feb 2025, 00:17 UTC293 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Значит русские освободили одних дагестанцев от рабство других дагов ?😏🤣так же как людей в исламской мире и Саудии освободили от рабство военно морской флот объедененной коалиции западных стран в 70-80х годах прошлого века 🤣🤣

💯3

23 Feb 2025, 00:15 UTC281 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ur_bechPhoto

Оказывается, когда Рамазан Абдулатипов произнес свою знаменитую фразу об освобождении им Дагестана от рабства, он приписал себе чужие заслуги. Дело в том, что формально этот процесс состоялся ещё в 1860-е годы, когда начальником Дагестанской области был генерал-лейтенант Леван Меликов. Царская администрация приступила к ликвидации института рабства в Дагестане в 1866 году после отмены крепостного права. К тому време

💯4

19 Feb 2025, 04:53 UTC302 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

: Что ты скажешь про Региональную державу Нохчичоь,имеет она место быть? Какие предпосылки этому? ChatGPT 4.0 & [🅼🅹] DeepSeek | GPT4 ✹: Концепция «Региональной державы Нохчичоь» (Чеченской Республики) является сложной и неоднозначной. На данный момент нет объективных данных, подтверждающих существование такой державы в общепринятом понимании этого термина. Вместо этого, можно говорить о стремлении Чеченской Республи

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GeneralniyShtabChR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 674,110 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Псих-диспансер” (@GeneralniyShtabChR), 184 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GeneralniyShtabChR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.