NЕ ST4L EБ4TЬ SYKУ, Y MEH9 H3 БЫL0 H4STR0EH1Я. NE ST4L YП0M1H4TЬ 0PP'4, Y M3H9 HE БЫL0 VД0XH0VEH1Я.
Channel
Gedzella
@Gedzellaa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
381subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002695770564 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Gedzellaa |
| Created | 22 May 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Gedzellaa |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 381 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:19 | 381 | first reading |
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 22 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.4%
- avg views ÷ 381 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 93.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (22 May 2025 – 18 July 2026) |
| Views total | 93 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
3,085 reactions across 5 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5426907155221455893 | 403 | 13.1% | |
| custom 5249231238723556809 | 227 | 7.36% | |
| custom 5298486851387019871 | 217 | 7.03% | |
| custom 5248969962978038729 | 212 | 6.87% | |
| custom 6138927318883636796 | 198 | 6.42% | |
| custom 5454206993852029667 | 172 | 5.58% | |
| custom 5456627658894886947 | 172 | 5.58% | |
| custom 5246810582270630120 | 114 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5256109688977643802 | 114 | 3.70% | |
| custom 5938007580545652550 | 102 | 3.31% | |
| custom 5900117464959686206 | 101 | 3.27% | |
| custom 5458844695243276850 | 100 | 3.24% | |
| custom 5249373865997525206 | 98 | 3.18% | |
| custom 5316606094343155517 | 96 | 3.11% | |
| custom 5334801667458098005 | 90 | 2.92% | |
| custom 6138675178533556460 | 90 | 2.92% | |
| custom 5249395645776680066 | 89 | 2.88% | |
| custom 5897933882111564658 | 86 | 2.79% | |
| custom 5465449173828525909 | 81 | 2.63% | |
| custom 5208632974458777294 | 63 | 2.04% | |
| 6 further kinds | 260 | 8.43% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,085reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2025 to 18 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 75
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 6 we hold a reading for · 50%
- Most on one post
- 45
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Gedzellaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 May 2025 to 18 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Поздравляю, ты стандартный.
custom 524896996297803872966custom 520863297445877729463custom 524937386599752520652custom 524902757137438802638custom 519297412069801293334custom 524923123872355680933custom 525610968897764380233custom 537081296678030786833
Я посадил в твоём имени сад — он цветёт по моему желанию.
custom 5456627658894886947103custom 524923123872355680993custom 525610968897764380281custom 546544917382852590948custom 521558883720340354947custom 524896996297803872946custom 524937386599752520646custom 589793388211156465846
Sexy Mew T.me/Gedzellaa 👋 iMessage 🖱️ Anonymous ✈️ Mew — 300+
custom 5426907155221455893161custom 531660609434315551796custom 529848685138701987188custom 545639117370060230255custom 523137680197604912353custom 545662765889488694740custom 589793388211156465840
👟 But I'm good when ya hit that stance.
custom 6138927318883636796198custom 5298486851387019871129custom 5426907155221455893128custom 533480166745809800590custom 613867517853355646090custom 524939564577668006689custom 546544917382852590933custom 545662765889488694729
🌟 Get up from shit and start over.
custom 5454206993852029667172custom 5246810582270630120114custom 5426907155221455893114custom 5938007580545652550102custom 5249231238723556809101custom 5900117464959686206101custom 5248969962978038729100custom 5458844695243276850100
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @Gedzellaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 342,231 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gedzella” (@Gedzellaa), 381 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gedzellaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.