Channel
@GedankenderTat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,657subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001274397018 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GedankenderTat |
| Created | 2 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GedankenderTat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 5,657 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 5,659 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:50 | 5,667 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 5,664 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 5,664 | first reading |
25 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (12 June 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 48,310 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Der Adler und die Krähe Der einzige Vogel, der es wagt, einen Adler zu picken, ist die Krähe. Die Krähe setzt sich auf den Rücken des Adlers und beißt ihm in den Nacken. Der Adler reagiert nicht darauf und kämpft auch nicht gegen die Krähe; er verschwendet weder Zeit noch Energie auf die Krähe, sondern breitet einfach seine Flügel aus und steigt immer höher in den Himmel auf. Je höher der Flug, desto schwerer fällt …
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Alles bereit, für das Seminar vom Wochenende, hier in Büren, im Kanton Solothurn in der Schweiz. Ein wundervolles Plätzchen, um theoretisches und viel praktisches, rund um die Elektrokultur, zu vermitteln. Morgen um 09.30h geht's los. Es gibt noch freie Plätze für kurzentschlossene. Und die Tour geht weiter, und ich freue mich auf jeden einzelnen Ort, an dem ich den Menschen von meinen Erfahrungen im Zusammenhang mi…
Neupflanzungen mit 100% Erfolg Die Elektrokultur betrachtet nicht nur die Pflanze, sondern vor allem auch das Umfeld. Jede Pflanze ist nach dem Erdmagnetfeld ausgerichtet. Wenn wir das berücksichtigen, beschleunigt sich das Wachstum, und die Pflanze kommt schnell ist in ihre volle Kraft. Diese Kraft nutzt sie für die Ausbildung von Früchten, und den Prozess der Selbstheilung. Das ist nur eines der Themen, dass ich d…
Eines meiner Ziele auf der Sommertour 2026. Ein grosser Geist seiner Zeit, dessen Energie immer noch hilfreich an unserer Seite steht.
Video, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Ich freue mich, in einer der schönsten Regionen der Schweiz aktiv zu sein und zur Schönheit des Zuvuya Flow Festivals 2026, mit Lakhovsky-Workshops beitragen zu dürfen.
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @GedankenderTat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 251,586 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GALARON - Gedanken der Tat” (@GedankenderTat), 5,657 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GedankenderTat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.