Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Garou | Release

@GarouRelease

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

138subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001748720256
TypeChannel
Username@GarouRelease
DescriptionDev/Owner: @itachichrist @qqluaqq Chat: @Garou_Chat
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/GarouRelease

Growth

1387 August 2026 — 138 subscribers8 August 2026 — 138 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 137–139 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:01138no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:13138first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 12 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
66
Videos
2
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

54 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3259.3%
1324.1%
🥰59.26%
🔥23.70%
😁23.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2023 to 16 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2024, 17:04 UTC≈1,240 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

There will be two versions with only esp and silent aim

👍2

Signed ITACHICHRIST ­

16 Jul 2024, 15:41 UTC≈1,290 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Should we add silent aim or not?

  1. Yes (risk ban)44%
  2. No (leave only esp)56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ITACHICHRIST ­

16 Jul 2024, 15:39 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 8 August 2026

Don't play with the new version, today there will be a new one with a little bypass

Signed ITACHICHRIST ­

15 Jul 2024, 10:51 UTC≈1,450 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Garou Release 3.3 | Zygisk Module - Support only 64 bit PUBGM. - GL, KR, TW, VN. - Preview click NOTE: I do not recommend playing from the main id. Use Your Bypass. Change log: added logo and lobby bypass Join ❤️ @GarouRelease

3👍1

Signed ITACHICHRIST ­

15 Jul 2024, 10:47 UTC≈1,180 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Added logo / lobby bypass

👍1

Signed ITACHICHRIST ­

14 Jul 2024, 15:37 UTC768 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Garou Release 3.3 | Zygisk Module - Support only 64 bit PUBGM. - GL, KR, TW, VN. - Preview click NOTE: I do not recommend playing from the main id. Use Your Bypass. Join ❤️ @GarouRelease

🥰4👍2😁2🔥1

Signed ITACHICHRIST ­

14 Jul 2024, 14:40 UTC≈1,200 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Get ready for the release today❤

6

Signed ITACHICHRIST ­

12 Jul 2024, 20:17 UTC722 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

There will be a release soon❤️

4

Signed ITACHICHRIST ­

12 Jul 2024, 16:08 UTC≈1,100 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

The module will be released very soon

👍4🔥1

Signed ITACHICHRIST ­

11 Jul 2024, 18:58 UTC534 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

PUBG ORIGINAL APK + OBB 3.3 ALL VERSION ⟩ GLOBAL 64 ⟨ ⟩ KOREA 64 ⟨ ⟩ VIETNAM 64 ⟨ ⟩ TAIWAN 64 ⟨

👍5

Signed ITACHICHRIST ­

11 Jul 2024, 17:53 UTC≈1,100 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

64 bit support, all PUBGM versions

👍5🥰1

Signed ITACHICHRIST ­

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GarouRelease. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Jul 2024, 15:41 UTCAnonymous Poll106 voters

Should we add silent aim or not?

  1. Yes (risk ban)44%
  2. No (leave only esp)56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2023 to 16 July 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Garou | Release” (@GarouRelease), 138 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GarouRelease.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.