Channel
@GabrielAmardInfo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
477subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001265945451 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GabrielAmardInfo |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GabrielAmardInfo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 477 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 473 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 473 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (13 July 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,664 |
| Reactions total | 155 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
227 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 146 | 64.3% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 29.5% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 6.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[INFO FRANCE 3 : Daikin va utiliser un nouveau PFAS qui se dégrade en TFA, polluant éternel susceptible d'être "toxique pour la reproduction"] Après des années de pollution, Daikin prétend encore introduire pour 2028 un gaz fluoré, le R1234YF, se transformant en TFA, un nouveau PFAS, dans son procédé industriel et ceci sans aucune étude d'impact environnemental ! Alors que l'académie des sciences souligne que le TF…
❤11👍6
J'apporte mon soutien total à Marie-Charlotte Garin. Personne ne devrait être menacé pour ses opinions. Le débat sur la question complexe de la lutte contre les viols sur mineur mérite mieux que des menaces hypocrites et politiciennes de la droite et l'extrême droite. Pour rappel : ➡️ seulement 3% des auteurs sont condamnés aujourd'hui en France ➡️ Les études démontrent qu'augmenter les peines sur ces cas n'a aucun…
❤20👍1
👨🚒 Après des jours de lutte contre les incendies en Gironde, dans le Var, en Corse et en Forêt de Fontainebleau, je tiens à saluer le travail et le courage de nos sapeurs-pompiers. Alors que près de 115000 hectares ont déjà été ravagés par les flammes cette année, bilan tristement record, la prévision de la hausse des températures et du vent ces prochains jours fait craindre aux redéparts de feu. Alors que nous avio…
👍20❤5
Ce lundi, j'ai été désigné pour conduire la liste insoumise dans le Rhône aux élections sénatoriales du 27 septembre 2026. Je remercie le comité électoral de la France Insoumise pour la confiance qu’il m’accorde. Je porte cette candidature avec une ambition claire : faire entrer, pour la première fois, des sénatrices et sénateurs insoumis·es au Sénat. Je mènerai une liste respectueuse de la diversité des rhodanienne…
❤22👍3
Hier, les députés macronistes, du RN et de LR ont enterré la pétition contre le « permis de tuer XXL », pourtant signée par plus de 720 000 personnes. Restons mobilisés ! Rendez-vous le 19 septembre 2026 pour participer à une mobilisation à l’initiative de collectifs et de syndicats. ----- Plus d'infos : https://t.me/FranceInsoumise
🔥12👍4
🔴🗣️ URGENT | Jérôme Legavre interpelle Laurent Nuñez sur la tentative d’enterrer la pétition contre la loi Permis de tuer XXL ! « Les 49-3 et les votes bloqués ne vous suffisent plus : vous tentez maintenant de faire taire une mobilisation massive contre une attaque grave pour la démocratie. Cette mesure vient de Jean-Marie Le Pen et accorde de fait une impunité aux forces de l'ordre. Comment appelle-t-on un régim…
❤12👍4
🔴🗣️ URGENT | Anne Stambach-Terrenoir interpelle le Gouvernement sur la loi Duplomb XXL ! « Vous avez réautorisé l’acétamipride et le flupyradifurone, des substances susceptibles d’exposer la population à des risques majeurs. Gouvernement, Marine Le Pen, Gabriel Attal, Édouard Philippe, vous empoisonnez notre eau, nos sols, notre air. Vous méprisez la vie jusqu’à sacrifier nos enfants sur l’autel des profits de Baye…
❤12👍3
Non à la loi "Genevard-Duplomb" ! Ce soir sera votée la loi "d'urgence agricole". Proposée par le gouvernement, elle intègre les dispositions problématiques de la "loi Duplomb". Parce qu'elle remet en cause les principes fondamentaux de protection de la ressource en eau, de la biodiversité et, à terme, de la santé humaine ; Parce que la Macronie, la droite et le RN se sont alliés pour réintroduire des pesticides t…
❤18👍2
Stop 🛑 ! Nous ne pouvons accepter que sous couvert d’urgence agricole la macronie, la droite et l’extrême droite fassent passer une loi destructrice du vivant et mettent en circulation des molécules cancérogènes. Les paysans, paysannes méritent des prix rémunérateurs, des débouchés pour une alimentation saine, de sortir d’un modèle qui les rend pauvre. Au lieu de ça on veut nous faire voter une loi qui met des molécu…
❤19👍4🔥2
Comme déjà 670000 personnes, j'ai signé la pétition contre la loi "Permis de tuer XXL" pour la présomption de légitime défense pour les forces de l'ordre. Première victoire : les macronistes voulaient élire un rapporteur LR pour son étude : raté ! C'est mon collègue Ugo Bernalicis qui a été choisi par la commission des lois. Mardi prochain sera examinée la recevabilité de cette pétition. Il faut donc que vous soyez…
❤11👍4
À #Lyon pour célébrer le 14 juillet 1789. Vive la République ! Vive la Révolution française ! En 2027, notre peuple peut à nouveau tenir tête à toutes les formes de privilèges et de despotisme. Comme en 1789, faisons vivre l'idéal d'une victoire du peuple sur les privilèges et l'arbitraire. #14Juillet - - - - - - - - - - - - 🔴 Retrouvez mon post sur mes réseaux sociaux 👉🏼Instagram 👉🏼Facebook 👉🏼X 👉🏼Threads 👉🏼Abonnez…
❤16👍1
🔻Vendredi dernier, nous avons échangé avec l'ULCGT de Villeurbanne sur le projet de loi du gouvernement qui veut revenir sur le 1er mai chômé et sur les conditions de travail et les salaires. Pour #LFI et Jean-Luc Mélenchon c'est : -Le SMIC augmenté de 15% et les salaires indexés sur celui-ci -Limiter l'écart des salaires dans l'entreprise à un écart de 1 à 20 entre le plus bas et le plus haut salaire -Aucune retrai…
👍15
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @GabrielAmardInfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 701,883 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gabriel Amard infos ✌🏻” (@GabrielAmardInfo), 477 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GabrielAmardInfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.