Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سۜب࣪ٙزؗ/🌱

Channel

سۜب࣪ٙزؗ/🌱

@G_r_e_ens

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

672subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002142698310
TypeChannel
Username@G_r_e_ens
CreatedBetween 1 December 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/G_r_e_ens

Growth

671672671.52 Sept 2026, 03:45 — 671 subscribers3 Sept 2026, 09:28 — 672 subscribers2 Sept 2026, 03:453 Sept 2026, 09:28
2 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 671–672 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 09:28672+1
2 Sept 2026, 03:45671first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 11s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

115 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6052.2%
🕊2017.4%
👏108.70%
🥰97.83%
👍43.48%
🔥43.48%
❤‍🔥32.61%
🌚21.74%
😢21.74%
🤩10.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2025 to 28 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @G_r_e_ens. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2025 to 28 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2025, 00:17 UTC≈1,190 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026

من فراموش نکردم عزیزم، فقط یاد گرفتم بدون صدا بابتش غصه بخورم.✅

4🥰1

26 Aug 2025, 17:05 UTC≈1,250 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

- می‌شه اُمیدوار بود به "تولدی دیگر"؟ در همین زندگی؟! ...

3🔥1🕊1

22 Aug 2025, 09:52 UTC516 views7 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

3❤‍🔥2🔥1🥰1

25 Jul 2025, 15:58 UTC≈1,070 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

[ Didar]• 2️⃣:1️⃣3️⃣🎼 ───────●─────── ⇆ㅤ ◁ ❚❚ ㅤ ▷ ↻ [🎧] @G_r_e_ens🥑

2👏1

23 Jul 2025, 07:51 UTC≈1,360 views9 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

+چه گلی دوصتداری ..؟! _من افتابگردون🌻✨ دوصتدارم و مخصوصا کسی که برام خریده رو بیشتر از همه دوصشدارم🤍🤍

8👏1

7 Jul 2025, 18:22 UTC≈1,290 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

من از خودم ضربه خوردم🪽 از مهربونی های بیجا و الکی؛ از دلسوزی های الکیم! از اعتماد های بی دلیلم؛ از انتخاب های اشتباه..! فکر میکردم آدما رو خوب میشناسم؛ فکر میکردم همه مثل خودم ساده ان! فکر میکردم چون من کاری به بقیه ندارم بقیه هم کاری با من ندارن..! فکر میکردم چون من خوبی بقیه رو می‌خوام بقیه هم خوبی و صلاح منو می‌خوان؛ من سخت اشتباه کردم و از خودم ضربه خوردم ولی هیچی بدتر از این نیست که پیش خودت از قلبت از خوب بودنت

5👍2

7 Jul 2025, 09:46 UTC≈1,070 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

گاهی یک کلمه، یک لحظه، می‌تواند نجاتت دهد.🌟

7👍1

4 Jul 2025, 12:45 UTC≈1,440 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏5🌚2👍1

1 Jul 2025, 05:47 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 2 September 2026
Poll

به نظر شما رنگ آبی نشون افسردگی .!💙🧚‍♂️

  1. بله 👍21%
  2. خیر👎82%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @G_r_e_ens. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jul 2025, 05:47 UTCAnonymous Poll106 voters

به نظر شما رنگ آبی نشون افسردگی .!💙🧚‍♂️

  1. بله 👍21%
  2. خیر👎82%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2025 to 28 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

کانال گیف عاشقانه متن بیو
@gi_hb · 34,762
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 3 September 2026
QC MUSIC
@qc_music · 35,899
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سۜب࣪ٙزؗ/🌱” (@G_r_e_ens), 672 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/G_r_e_ens.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.