啊叔你照下镜啦

Channel
广佛战地记者频道
@GZzdjz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,057subscribers
+135 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002762944721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GZzdjz |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GZzdjz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 3,057 | +50 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 3,007 | +75 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 2,932 | +10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 2,922 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 69.6%
- avg views ÷ 3,057 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,130
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (31 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 31,920 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7m 06s
- Average length
- 2m 22s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
确实心里舒服多了 好几个人都去了不在群里告知一下
专访 关于流星,也就是万人迷,某知名记者进行了独家专访,详细描述了该人妖开课始末,真是该死,被爆料还持续找人出来洗,拉黑狼友,无恶不作 前情提要 怕狼友们不知道到底怎么个事,附上前情提要,转自柳三秒 https://t.me/CSLiu3/2160
受害者1,和受害者2,笑死我了,哈哈哈哈哈哈
广泛征集3.8号左右去过这个老师的狼友,他在这个时间段来过广东开课,急需报告急需报告,记者真的太好奇了 @gxmmdsa 尤其这位:https://t.me/beautiful22025/1159
近日接到多位老师的举报,说电报上有个神人,约好课以后,到了时间谎称自己找不到是哪栋楼,然后只要老师有一点催的意思,马上就翻脸然后索要20~30元不等的路费赔偿。如果老师不给,就威胁在楼下蹲守后面的客人报警。 这个神人要得不多,有些老师怕麻烦就直接给了,因此他才多次得手。 这次他被发现,是因为老师让他拍一张到了楼下的图,结果这神人是从高德地图的相册里找到别人发的小区大门照片。 也就是说,这神人全程应该都是坐在家里,同时诈骗好几个老师。😅
扒一扒成都电报圈子臭名昭著的大白菜 卷首语:本来不想挂这个讨口子(臭要饭的),因为挂讨口子的本质还是给他蹭流量。但最近收到太多人的投稿,群情激愤,故整理了下大白菜做了的腌臜事。不要问我证据都在哪儿,证据太多了贴不完。有兴趣可以翻翻本条评论区,也许能看见不少。同时,也以成都瓜台的立场,呼吁各位瓜台同行,不要给他做宣传。如果你只是想拿他的流量给自己引点流,看完下面的事例,你就会明白他那儿的流量价值太拉了。 大白菜的“光荣战绩”: 一、背刺狼友: 会在表面称兄道弟的情况下,主动去私聊老师,告诉老师这个狼友是嗑药桩机,不要接这个狼友;以及曾向我主动投稿包括且不限于浦浦等推手的所谓黑料,由于编造的过于拙劣,就没发出来 二、抹黑老师: 曾有过因为老师不愿意给优惠的前提下,跑来向我主动投稿说是要曝光黑车,但由于相关证据过于薄弱,依旧拒绝发稿 三、拿了优惠不办事: 大白菜那边上榜的,全是他吃了优惠收了好处才推的,一旦收到差评,在不考证的…
全国开展深化扫黑除恶专项斗争 举报途径公布 近日,党中央就深化扫黑除恶专项斗争作出部署,明确从今年7月开始,利用1年左右时间,在全国范围开展深化扫黑除恶专项斗争。在这次深化扫黑除恶专项斗争中,人民群众可以选择下列途径进行举报: 一是利用全国“12337”统一线上举报平台。通过网上搜索“12337”或点击中国长安网、中央政法委长安剑微信公众号等链接,可随时随地、方便快捷地登录举报平台,填写相关信息并提交后,全国扫黑办即实时受理; 二是通过公安部、国家信访局、各省级扫黑办公布的举报渠道,以及电信网络、金融等行业主管部门及相关互联网平台的投诉举报途径,进行举报; 三是各地在深化扫黑除恶专项斗争期间新公布的举报热线、举报平台、举报地址邮箱等举报途径。 对通过上述途径获取的线索,中央政法委将全力做好转办、督办、核查、反馈等工作,必要时启动提级抽查复核工作,推动查深查透。同时,严格落实线索保密、人身保护和有奖举报制度,引导群众主动检举涉黑…
初代网黄野猪王,专拱白菜🥬,听说2020年就开始混迹tg,一定有不少瓜 https://t.me/DEtmNCod1Ng1NmVl 蟹黄堡不服,说他也是老网黄了 @zzfzz111l
她收过你的白嫖券,你也说过你会娶她。后来才发现,有些门进去了,心却永远进不去。 by。长沙地下说唱 全广州征集柳三秒去过的mmk,我太想知道他沉了谁的船了
一则喜讯: 野犬老登小鸡吧炸号了,简直天降正义!!
老哥7.27去了个老师,差点被摁 老哥近两天鸡儿不适去了医院 老哥查出来得了淋 老哥打了吊水 老哥十分淡定 老哥说号废了,以后只能聊天了 对了,老哥全程戴套 武汉的老师 @Ccbbiu 老哥的出击报告https://t.me/nichnecj/78
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @GZzdjz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 776,810 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“广佛战地记者频道” (@GZzdjz), 3,057 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GZzdjz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.