Channel
@GZV933
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002639879687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GZV933 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 23 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GZV933 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 4 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 4 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
261 reactions across 14 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 8.05% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5891125603033159635 | 21 | 8.05% | |
| custom 5375051326407341694 | 17 | 6.51% | |
| custom 5386774199123595430 | 16 | 6.13% | |
| custom 5258090261606584661 | 14 | 5.36% | |
| custom 5291934281776519592 | 13 | 4.98% | |
| custom 5890888928860312890 | 12 | 4.60% | |
| custom 5033056699968127861 | 11 | 4.21% | |
| custom 5339355243324922486 | 10 | 3.83% | |
| custom 5425118623465223218 | 10 | 3.83% | |
| custom 5253710550310870929 | 9 | 3.45% | |
| custom 5375333956730252120 | 9 | 3.45% | |
| custom 5386600141278956320 | 9 | 3.45% | |
| custom 5296772291852525228 | 8 | 3.07% | |
| custom 5352896394740912832 | 8 | 3.07% | |
| custom 5465208750149223956 | 8 | 3.07% | |
| custom 5472367150666636379 | 8 | 3.07% | |
| custom 5838947780520843557 | 8 | 3.07% | |
| custom 5229121299900554360 | 7 | 2.68% | |
| custom 5274202754108113188 | 7 | 2.68% | |
| custom 5350383426555890494 | 7 | 2.68% | |
| 10 further kinds | 49 | 18.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2025 to 27 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GZV933. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 March 2025 to 27 May 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
@SHOT_16 — @GZV933 Братья — это те, кто за спиной как броня, а впереди — как пуля: быстро, точно и без пощады для врагов. Мы не просто семья — мы фронт.
custom 50330566999681278612custom 52967722918525252282custom 53750513264073416942custom 58389477805208435572custom 52537105503108709291custom 58911256030331596351
@BRNOTANYM – @GZV933 "Братство — это не по крови, а по духу."
custom 58389477805208435572custom 49813860486689597511custom 50330566999681278611custom 52291212999005543601custom 52537105503108709291custom 52967722918525252281custom 53750513264073416941custom 58911256030331596351
@bratya778 & @GZV933 Сила не в мышцах, а в том, что за спиной стоит брат.
custom 50330566999681278613custom 54652087501492239562custom 54720013697768704582custom 58911256030331596352custom 52291212999005543601custom 52537105503108709291custom 53750513264073416941custom 58389477805208435571
@BIZUS7 $ @GZV933 bauyrlas — это не когда много слов, а когда дела говорят громче
custom 50330566999681278612custom 52291212999005543602custom 53503834265558904942custom 54720013697768704582custom 58911256030331596352custom 52537105503108709291custom 54652087501492239561custom 54720097320781976781
«Мы не родные по крови, но ближе родных по выбору и поступкам» @TAMYR017 🌟 @GZV933
custom 52537105503108709292custom 52967722918525252282custom 54720097320781976782custom 58908889288603128902custom 50330566999681278611custom 53503834265558904941custom 53750513264073416941custom 54652087501492239561
Our idea. 👕
custom 52537105503108709293custom 52291212999005543602custom 53503834265558904942custom 53750513264073416942custom 54652087501492239562custom 54720097320781976782custom 58908889288603128902custom 58911256030331596352
Byz kaita oraldyk, zaletaite 👕
custom 52967722918525252283custom 53750513264073416943custom 53503834265558904942custom 54652087501492239562custom 54720013697768704582custom 58389477805208435572custom 49813860486689597511custom 50330566999681278611
Брат за брата — это не просто слова, а смысл жизни 🌟 @bizB7R 🤩 @GZV933
custom 58911256030331596356custom 53867741991235954305custom 54723671506666363795custom 52580902616065846612custom 53750513264073416942custom 53753339567302521202custom 53864734826933966382custom 58908889288603128902
Sticker, posted without a caption
LEGENDS don’t walk alone. Real brothers don't say words, they do things. @BIZRM23 🤩 @GZV933 23.03.25 - unbreakable bonds.
custom 52742027541081131885custom 54584703373038241024custom 54585623312083366833custom 53750513264073416942custom 53866001412789563202custom 52919342817765195921custom 53753339567302521201custom 53864734826933966381
Signed Gazizov Nurbek
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Gazizov Nurbek
Брат — это не просто слово, а обещание быть рядом, что бы ни случилось.🌟 GZV 💬 WAKA
custom 54563586565032034725custom 54584703373038241023custom 53528963947409128322custom 53753339567302521202custom 58911256030331596352custom 52919342817765195921custom 53750513264073416941custom 53867741991235954301
Signed Gazizov Nurbek
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GZV933. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,345,296 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@GZV933 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GAZIZ — 933” (@GZV933), 4 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GZV933.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.