Channel

广州佛山🔥高质量98🔥诚信经营🔥

@GZFSgzlsm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

744subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002192303730
Type	Channel
Username	@GZFSgzlsm
Created	Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	14 August 2026
Measurements held	3
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/GZFSgzlsm

Growth

3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 734–745 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
14 Aug 2026, 09:28	744	+8
7 Aug 2026, 04:10	736	+1
6 Aug 2026, 19:31	735	first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 66.2%; avg views ÷ 744 subscribers
Avg views / post: 492; 3 posts measured
Reaction rate: 0%; reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window: 3; of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held	11 (23 June 2026 – 1 August 2026)
Views total	1,477
Reactions total	0
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	6 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share	Share, drawn
❤	2	100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 455,546 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

欧博官网|亚星官网|皇冠官网|利博官网
@longteng5135 · 2482 posts 亚洲及日本AV色情视频网站
@avyk1 · 9711 post 8/2025
@chat0309 · 621 post 皇冠体育皇冠娱乐皇冠官网皇冠代理
@hanhuabaobuding · 831 post 皇冠官网🅱️皇冠私网🅱️皇冠登2🅱️皇冠登3
@hg34253 · 2691 post 世界历史|人文|地理|漫画
@lishirenw · 5321 post 欧博官网🅱️亚星官网🅱️皇冠官网🅱️利博官网
@oubo7866 · 3071 post 体育赛事世界杯赛事足球赛事体育博彩
@oubo9969 · 6281 post 亚星代理欧博代理亚星私网欧博私网
@ouboguanwang688 · 9381 post 欧博私网🅰️万利私网🅰️环球UG私网🅰️亚星欧博/百家乐代理
@p2345nb · 5,7411 post 吉隆坡外围/吉隆坡会所/东南亚外围
@Qingmai9019 · 5771 post 欧博代理欧博私网亚星代理亚星私网
@qunfanikd · 5571 post 古典美御姐高清异国
@shmstcjs · 5431 post 跨境短信
@Speedyabc3 · 4581 post 长沙一品茶楼
@xiaoran7456A · 491 post 皇冠官网|皇冠登1|皇冠登2|皇冠登3
@yaxing534 · 2931 post 皇冠百家乐欧博百家乐亚星百家乐亚星代理
@yaxingguanwang6 · 9611 post 欧博代理欧博官网欧博正网欧博百家乐
@zh_cnjdiww · 891 post 欧博假网亚星假网欧博包杀亚星包杀
@zh_cnjdndhfb · 3441 post 欧博正网欧博开户欧博代理欧博私网
@zh_cnjdndn · 3651 post 欧博私网亚星私网欧博包杀亚星包杀
@zh_cnjdnjec · 4561 post 皇冠官网皇冠私网皇冠百家乐皇冠体育
@zh_cnjdnniw · 891 post 欧博官网亚星官网皇冠官网澳门新葡京
@zh_cnjduiufh · 921 post 足球下注世界杯买球世界杯交流 2026年世界杯
@zuqiumaizhu · 6201 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“广州佛山🔥高质量98🔥诚信经营🔥” (@GZFSgzlsm), 744 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GZFSgzlsm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.