Лучший покерный канал от команды GipsyTeam
Бот, который максимально оперативно присылает акции румов: @GTOffersBot
По вопросам сотрудничества: @Alexander_GipsyTeam
Created
2 April 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 96 days, net +812. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,053–14,186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 12:10
14,055
+12
8 Nov 2026, 21:21
14,043
+35
7 Nov 2026, 17:16
14,008
-46
6 Nov 2026, 15:21
14,054
+5
5 Nov 2026, 13:40
14,049
+3
4 Nov 2026, 15:17
14,046
+1
3 Nov 2026, 12:18
14,045
+5
2 Nov 2026, 14:49
14,040
+4
1 Nov 2026, 16:40
14,036
-7
31 Oct 2026, 14:08
14,043
+9
30 Oct 2026, 14:58
14,034
+3
29 Oct 2026, 15:40
14,031
+8
28 Oct 2026, 14:50
14,023
+11
27 Oct 2026, 14:27
14,012
+11
26 Oct 2026, 13:55
14,001
+6
25 Oct 2026, 13:50
13,995
-4
24 Oct 2026, 13:34
13,999
-2
23 Oct 2026, 16:56
14,001
+7
22 Oct 2026, 20:08
13,994
+14
21 Oct 2026, 15:35
13,980
first reading
Engagement
145 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 14,055 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,770
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 145 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 43 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
145 (30 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
121,720
Reactions total
836
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 07:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈513
Videos
≈37
Links
≈6,910
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
2,998 reactions across 138 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,148
38.3%
👍
618
20.6%
🔥
493
16.4%
😁
159
5.30%
💩
155
5.17%
✍
148
4.94%
💯
64
2.13%
👎
50
1.67%
🫡
34
1.13%
🥴
27
0.901%
🤯
24
0.801%
😢
19
0.634%
🤔
11
0.367%
🤷♂
10
0.334%
😱
9
0.3%
👌
7
0.233%
👏
6
0.2%
🆒
5
0.167%
🎃
4
0.133%
🙈
4
0.133%
1 further kind
3
0.1%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 145 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,062 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 145 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 145 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GTplus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 145 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 44 posts held from the last 30 days (22.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Осенний кубок на Покердоме: 50 турбо-турниров с гарантией 25 млн
С 13 по 22 ноября на Покердоме пройдет серия «Осенний кубок: Турбо». В расписании 50 турниров с бай-инами от 500 до 15,000 рублей по холдему, омахе, ананасу и шортдеку.
🏆 Главный турнир — «Корона монарха» с бай-ином 3,500 рублей и гарантией 5 млн. Он пройдет 22 ноября в 18:00 по Москве. Из других заметных турниров: «Изумрудный зал» с гарантией 1.5 м…
Сколько сегодня зарабатывают русскоязычные регуляры?
Отвечать на этот вопрос каждый месяц помогает рубрика #ТопТопыч на форуме GipsyTeam. Мы собираем отчеты игроков — и получаем вполне объемную картину того, на какой доход можно рассчитывать на разных лимитах. Вот хайлайты октября:
1️⃣ Slawys, +$21,800. Играет PL500-1000 на ПОКЕРОК, так что солидную часть профита принесли бонусы и рейк-гонки. Хиро поставил себе ц…
Как Мариано свёл с ума Алека Торелли: разбор раздачи от Сауло Коста
В новом видео бразильский тренер изучил раздачу самого успешного игрока в истории стримов Hustler — и объяснил, чему она может научить каждого из нас.
👉 $100/$100 со страддлом и анте. Мариано открыл A♠️4♠️ с баттона ($500), Алек Торелли 3-бетнул с Q♠️Q♣️ с ББ ($2,500). Мариано ответил 4-бетом до $6,200 и заколлировал 5-бет $14,500. Эффективный ст…
Куда исчезает А-игра и как ее вернуть: советы ментал-коуча
Психолог Алан Лонго рассказал, на что стоит обращать внимание, чтобы скатываться в С-игру пореже.
🤷♂️ Один и тот же регуляр в отдельные моменты может показывать абсолютно разный уровень игры. С-игра есть практически у всех — когда вы теряете концентрацию, ошибаетесь на ровном месте и катаете на автопилоте. Причина обычно не в недостатке знаний или опыта,…
Блеф, который был обречен на провал? Аарон Барон учит рассказывать логичные истории
Топ-рег и тренер Upswing Poker разобрал 3 раздачи из дискорда школы. Все интересные, особенно эта:
👌 Раздача из турнира PKO. Студент спросил, имеет ли его линия право на жизнь — или это просто сжигание фишек. Сразу на полях отмечу, что то, что может казаться в PKO “сжиганием фишек”, зачастую оказывается верной игрой! Всё завязано …
Гарретт Адельстайн — величайший кэшевик в истории? Изучаем статистику на сайте BadBeatTV
Разработчики Hand2Note запилили сайт со статистикой со всех популярных стримов. Копаться довольно увлекательно: доступны общие цифры, результаты каждого отдельного эфира и подробные данные по всем участникам.
🕺 Что там в Hustler? На главном покерном стриме планеты на глазах благодарных зрителей в сумме разыграли почти два с пол…
Опять 25! 💸 Дарим 25 EU на RedStar при пополнении баланса
Условия простые:
⏺️ бонус можно получить один раз
⏺️ пополнение — только через криптовалюту
⏺️ минимальная сумма — 25 EU
⏺️ для вывода бонуса нужно набрать 500 Status Points
💡 После пополнения напишите RED25 в @gipsyteamsocial2 — начислим вам бонус.
$2,000,000 в новой серии на Stake Poker с 11 ноября
На Stake Poker анонсировали турнирный фестиваль JACKED с повторением рекордного призового фонда в $2,000,000. Расписание пока не опубликовано: известно о 198 турнирах с бай-инами от $5 до $1,000, которые продлятся с 11 по 30 ноября.
💰Крупнейшие гарантии серии:
- Treasure Hunt $20,000 GTD — каждую субботу (14, 21 и 28 ноября)
- Juicy Treasure Hunt $50,000 GTD — …
Какой вопрос задать, чтобы угадать случайную карту в колоде? Отличная задачка от математика
Американский профессор математики Калифорнийского государственного университета в Сакраменто Джей Каммингс подкинул элегантную задачку о карточной колоде, оцените:
Из колоды достали случайную карту, которую вам нужно угадать. Перед этим вы можете задать один вопрос, на который получите ответ “да” или “нет”. Что будет выгоднее…
🔱 Виктор Кудинов — чиплидер финальной шестёрки в турнире за $3k на Triton
В QQPK Genesis на Северном Кипре осталось шесть игроков из 912 входов. У Enlight'a — 76 блайндов. Ближайший преследователь отстаёт почти вдвое, а победителя ждут $460,000. За титул также поборются Павел Игнатов и Руслан Каспер.
Пока Виктор готовится к развязке, вспоминаем его откровенное интервью 2022 года — о миллионе раздач за год, депресси…
Реакция на второй баррель: урок Тима Дженкинса
Тренер Upswing Poker рассказал, как грамотно строить стратегию на тёрне, если оппонент продолжает агрессию. Сценарий — защитили ББ и сыграли чек-колл на флопе.
1️⃣ Во-первых, рассмотрите опцию лида, если карта тёрна подходит вашему диапазону лучше. Самый простой пример — спарка средней карты: трипсов у вас заведомо больше, ведь со второй или третьей парой оппонент мо…
Сауло Коста: “Онлайн-покер хоронят уже 20 лет! Почему вы каждый раз в это верите?”
Оцените свежее эссе топового бразильского тренера о прошлом, настоящем и будущем онлайн-покера.
👉 На форуме 2+2 пользователь-новичок digit создал тему “Старые-добрые времена онлайна”, где спросил у регов, правда ли золотые годы онлайн-покера закончились. Дата — 31 мая 2009 года. Через пару часов он получил такой ответ:
“Золотые годы…
❤35💩6👎2🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 145 posts we hold for @GTplus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@GTplus edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Блефач | Покер @blefach · 20,049 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 September 2026
Миша Иннер - Покер с Про @mishainner · 20,789 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
SafePoker l Обучение и новости покера @SafePoker_official · 19,454 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 October 2026
Андрей Козленко(блог есть жи) @babyshark4 · 27,280 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
ПОКЕРОК @pokerok_official · 48,377 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 September 2026
Pokerbet @pokerbet_official · 22,507 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Что на ривере?” (@GTplus), 14,055 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GTplus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.