Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Госпожа Рекомендует

Channel

Госпожа Рекомендует

@GOSPREK

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

301,139subscribers

-17,613 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002361543703
TypeChannel
Username@GOSPREK
DescriptionРеклама, сотрудничество: [email protected] @etozhedar @mozeework Концерты: [email protected] Регистрация в РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68480d4eacde51354235e92a
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held36
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GOSPREK

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

301,139318,752309,945.56 August 2026 — 318,752 subscribers6 August 2026 — 318,713 subscribers7 August 2026 — 318,358 subscribers8 August 2026 — 318,041 subscribers9 August 2026 — 317,764 subscribers10 August 2026 — 317,600 subscribers11 August 2026 — 317,262 subscribers12 August 2026 — 316,877 subscribers13 August 2026 — 316,483 subscribers14 August 2026 — 315,843 subscribers16 August 2026 — 315,270 subscribers17 August 2026 — 314,824 subscribers18 August 2026 — 314,481 subscribers19 August 2026 — 314,059 subscribers20 August 2026 — 313,607 subscribers21 August 2026 — 313,246 subscribers22 August 2026 — 312,666 subscribers24 August 2026 — 312,197 subscribers25 August 2026 — 312,114 subscribers26 August 2026 — 311,914 subscribers27 August 2026 — 311,654 subscribers28 August 2026 — 311,428 subscribers29 August 2026 — 311,017 subscribers30 August 2026 — 310,573 subscribers31 August 2026 — 310,244 subscribers1 September 2026 — 309,831 subscribers2 September 2026 — 309,416 subscribers3 September 2026 — 308,874 subscribers5 September 2026 — 308,221 subscribers9 September 2026 — 307,048 subscribers11 September 2026 — 306,057 subscribers13 September 2026 — 305,477 subscribers15 September 2026 — 304,902 subscribers17 September 2026 — 304,205 subscribers19 September 2026 — 303,457 subscribers26 September 2026 — 301,139 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
36 measurements spanning 51 days, net -17,613. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 298,497–321,394 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 15:18301,139-2,318
19 Sept 2026, 17:14303,457-748
17 Sept 2026, 05:40304,205-697
15 Sept 2026, 05:16304,902-575
13 Sept 2026, 14:19305,477-580
11 Sept 2026, 17:54306,057-991
9 Sept 2026, 01:55307,048-1,173
5 Sept 2026, 17:55308,221-653
3 Sept 2026, 16:58308,874-542
2 Sept 2026, 06:44309,416-415
1 Sept 2026, 07:08309,831-413
31 Aug 2026, 06:43310,244-329
30 Aug 2026, 08:19310,573-444
29 Aug 2026, 08:17311,017-411
28 Aug 2026, 10:26311,428-226
27 Aug 2026, 12:06311,654-260
26 Aug 2026, 13:14311,914-200
25 Aug 2026, 12:34312,114-83
24 Aug 2026, 11:38312,197-469
22 Aug 2026, 20:25312,666first reading

Engagement

132 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 301,139 subscribers
Avg views / post
30,900
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 132 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held132 (3 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total1,669,500
Reactions total57,094
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 08:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,010
Videos
≈456
Links
≈271

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15m 15s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

150,449 reactions across 132 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5305567208053695927150,449100.0%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 132 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 150,449 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
460
across the posts below
Posts paid on
100
of 132 we hold a reading for · 76%
Most on one post
32
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GOSPREK. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 132 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 13:52 UTC≈15,600 views960 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Photo

устала быть самой красивой➕стильной➕талантливой➕классной➕смешной➕прикольна дуть губки на камеру 👅💋

custom 5305567208053695927960

25 Sept 2026, 15:40 UTC≈23,200 views759 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5305567208053695927759

22 Sept 2026, 16:46 UTC≈34,900 views604 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @gosposhabeautyPhoto

👀 БЭЭЭТЧ, МЫ ЖЕ ГОВОРИЛИ, ЧТО ЭТО ЕЩЁ НЕ ВСЁ 👀 ну вот… вторая часть дропа официально здесь 💅 и дааа, мы сразу собрали ТРИ СЕТИКА 🔥 Caramel Provocateur + La Sultane de Russo + Bacarussia🫦👧 💗 La Sultane de Russo + Bacarussia + Macadamia Dream☁️💗 🍒 Wet Cherry + Pick me Strawberry🍓💋 короче, мы уже всё красиво собрали за вас остаётся только выбрать, какая сегодня ты 💅 💅🤫и самое вкусное: эти сеты мы собрали эксклюзи…

custom 5305567208053695927604

21 Sept 2026, 19:09 UTC≈30,100 views1,220 reactions3 Starsread 27 September 2026
Forwarded from @GOSPOSHA_EVELINVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53055672080536959271,220

20 Sept 2026, 14:31 UTC≈36,200 views1,890 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Photo

самая эстетичная мотивашка вам в ленту💅

custom 53055672080536959271,890

19 Sept 2026, 19:46 UTC≈37,200 views953 reactions2 Starsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠ВОТ ТАКАЯ БЕЛКОВАЯ ХРЮЧКА В 🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡🔡 - ньюоки гусенечки - тертый сырочек - мацарелка - black икорочка - матадорочка мартаделочка И ВСЕ В СЛИВОЧКИ 🟰красивые попички 🤩

custom 5305567208053695927953

18 Sept 2026, 13:40 UTC≈34,700 views673 reactions2 Starsread 26 September 2026
Forwarded from @gosposhabeautyPhoto

🔥 ЛЕГЕНДЫ ВЕРНУЛИСЬ, БЭЭЭЭТЧ🔥 ну всё… тот самый comeback случился💅 ✨ Bacarussia 🍒 Wet Cherry 💗 Macadamia Dream 🍓 Pick me Strawberry 🥭 Midnight Sun тот самый состав снова в игре 💅 🥭 Midnight Sun теперь в полном размере 🍓 Pick me Strawberry теперь можно взять отдельно уже на вэбэшечке и сайтиксе на озончике появятся чуть позже🤍🤍🤍🤍 и дааа… это ещё не конец 👀 послезавтра покажем кое-что ещё 🖱 ВЭБЭШЕЧКА 🖱 🗝🗝🖱 сайт

custom 5305567208053695927673

15 Sept 2026, 14:30 UTC≈37,600 views1,320 reactions6 Starsread 25 September 2026
Forwarded from @GOSPOSHA_EVELINPhoto

Наша королева на съемках нового шоу Леши Янгера 👸

custom 53055672080536959271,320

15 Sept 2026, 06:34 UTC≈40,100 views1,770 reactions15 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

это не я скамейку сломала, клянусь 💅

custom 53055672080536959271,770

14 Sept 2026, 12:33 UTC≈36,900 views874 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

зашла на вб поискать блеск, чтобы скинуть вам ссылку, ахнула и охнула…. листаю и вижу СЕБЯ 😭 только меня просто изменили иишкой, а фотосессию нашу спиздили целиком и на моей же фотке продают какую-то хуйню, которая даже не блестит 😭 что это блять почему там моя фотка короче вы лучше идите за оригой, она как раз сейчас по скидке на вб))) https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/1012249252/detail.aspx?size=1511187407

custom 5305567208053695927874

12 Sept 2026, 13:51 UTC≈34,900 views770 reactions1 Starread 20 September 2026
Video

сегодня я сама же охереваю с наших блесков👀👀👀 Я никогда не пробовала наносить рубиновую фурию не плотняком, а сегодня я снимала грвм АНТИСТРЕССАМИ и нанесла её легонько СЛАЙМОМ, сука СЛАЙМОМ….⚡️⚡️⚡️ и я охерела с этого оттенка, это самый нежнейший подсвет шиммером и розовинка хотя это красный….. блеск на WB блеск в ЗЯ

custom 5305567208053695927770

12 Sept 2026, 07:59 UTC≈33,200 views1,110 reactions3 Starsread 20 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53055672080536959271,110

Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @GOSPREK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Госпожа Рекомендует” (@GOSPREK), 301,139 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GOSPREK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.