Channel

𓅢⃝̸̷̶⃨⃜ۖ͜†᪲࣪࣪࣪࣪࣪𝐆̶̸𝗔̸̷̶ࠦ͢𝐍̸ְؒ𝐆̸̷ࣲۡۙ𝗦̶̽𝗧̸̷̥ࠦ̽𝐀̸̶ְؒ 𓅢⃞̸̷̶̵ֻ⃨⃜ᷓᷤ͐ᷲۖۗە‣࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭࣪࣪࣪….

@GNGST4

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

199subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002490976407
Type	Channel
Username	@GNGST4
Description	@GNGST4 ᷿𓂅࣭࣭࣭𓃉𓇡⃞̸ֻ⃨᷿⃜ە࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭𓅢⃝̸̷̶⃨⃜ۖ͜†᪲࣪࣪࣪࣪࣪﹌̸̸᷿᩿᩿ᷤ᪲ᩴܽۖ𓅡⃝̷̸̶⃨⃜⃛ ֻ͐͜※⁐᪵࣭᪲࣪࣪࣪𓅢⃞̸̷̶̵ֻ⃨⃜ᷓᷤ͐ᷲۖۗە‣࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭࣪࣪࣪…•ࣩ⃜⃜ؖ㜻㜳 𓅢⃝̸̷̶⃨⃜ۖ͜†᪲࣪࣪࣪࣪࣪𝐆̶𝗔ࠦ𝐍̸ְؒ𝐆ࣲۡۙ𝗦̶𝗧ࠦ𝐀̸ְؒ 𓅢⃞̸̷̶̵ֻ⃨⃜ᷓᷤ͐ᷲۖۗە‣࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭࣪࣪࣪…. 㜫㜜 ˮ Own @turklv 𓂅࣭࣭ @gngst_ck 𓂅࣭࣭࣭𓃉𓇡⃞̸ֻ⃨᷿⃜ە࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭𓅢⃝̸̷̶⃨⃜ۖ͜
Created	Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	8 August 2026
Measurements held	2
On Telegram	t.me/GNGST4

Growth

2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 198–200 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
8 Aug 2026, 11:33	199	no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:39	199	first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days: 26.2%; avg views ÷ 199 subscribers
Avg views / post: 52.1; 8 posts measured
Reaction rate: 16.4%; reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window: 8; of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
Window	Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held	8 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total	417
Reactions total	65
Forwards / comments	not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken	8 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos: 51
Links: 1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
custom 5393404855534515437	11	16.9%
custom 5395677245421415118	11	16.9%
custom 5368511628813805614	6	9.23%
custom 5373075637156216513	6	9.23%
custom 5393185601749022453	6	9.23%
custom 5296573301722728354	5	7.69%
custom 5395432608379199720	5	7.69%
custom 5368717289027837392	4	6.15%
custom 5393259990582585852	4	6.15%
custom 5469701105552227408	4	6.15%
custom 5363870465678941528	3	4.62%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,002,655 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

ㅤㅤㅤ🔐ㅤ𓉘𓁈𓉝𝗦ؔ𝐈͠𝗡𝗡҉𝗘۱͢𝗦𝗦͠𝀶
@devilsavlatore · 171 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

̥̥̥̥𓉘̸̸̷̶̥̥̥̥̟̈́𓉊⃞̷᪵︡︢𝐉̷̸⃨᪵᪶⃜𝗨̷̸⃨︧࣭࣭⃜⃜࣪࣪࣪͝𝕹̸⃨︨⃜𝖦⃝⃓̷̸̸⃜̈́࣫࣫𓊂⃝᪵࣫𝗞̷̸⃨⃜𝕺̷̸̷̸⃨⃜ ︨︡𝕺⃨⃜᷍ ̸࣭࣭࣭࣭࣮ࣥ𝗞⃞̸̸̷̮︩⃜𓉊̷̈́̽ 𓉝̸̸̸̷̶̝̤̥̥̥̺͍࣫࣫
@TURKSOWON · 162 posts 𓊈𝗝̷𝗘̷̸̶̲𝗡̷̸𝗡𝗜𝗘̸𓊑𝗦̷̽𝗢̸̷𝗪𝗢̷̸𝗡̴𓊉
@J3NARC · 201 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𓅢⃝̸̷̶⃨⃜ۖ͜†᪲࣪࣪࣪࣪࣪𝐆̶̸𝗔̸̷̶ࠦ͢𝐍̸ְؒ𝐆̸̷ࣲۡۙ𝗦̶̽𝗧̸̷̥ࠦ̽𝐀̸̶ְؒ 𓅢⃞̸̷̶̵ֻ⃨⃜ᷓᷤ͐ᷲۖۗە‣࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭࣭࣪࣪࣪….” (@GNGST4), 199 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GNGST4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.