Channel
@GM_BL8DE
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004322390112 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GM_BL8DE |
| Description | списки союзников блэйда с проекта @GM_1NF0 |
| Created | 20 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GM_BL8DE |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:32 | 1 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 1 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (20 June 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 310 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⋅ ⋅ ⎯ !🔋𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 — 🔋𝗂𝗌𝗍 №3 — 5/30¡ 1. 𓆩𝕺𝐄𝕷𝖀𝐆𝐄 𝐎𝐅 𝐕𝕺♱𝐂𝕰𝐒𓆪 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @DELUGE_info 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @DELUGE_life 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @siffow 2. 𝓢𝓮𝓱𝓷𝓼𝓾𝓬𝓱𝓽 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @Snst_info 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @Snst_life 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @Ai_Niq 3. ﹫ Aָ࣪𝗡:ꓷ֕𝐄 ⃟🌺 𝗠ָ࣪𝖠𝖫𝖨֕𝖭ℰ𝖫𝖫𝖤 ❜ 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @inf0_AML 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @lif3_AML 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @Ianhes 4. 𓂃⩇⩇.⩇⩇/𝒁𝖊r𝔬-𝑫a𝖞 𝑳𝖊g𝒂𝖈𝒚𓏴 ۫ ۫ 𝅄ׄ 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @InfoZer0Day 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @LifeZeroDays 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @meow_sk1i [коломбина] 5. ℜⲀꪝ ℛ𝕒𝕔𝕖ᜎ𝚛𝚊ck ⌯ HUB 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @RAW_…
⋅ ⋅ ⎯ !🔋𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗒 🔋𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 — 2/??¡ 1. . ᎒ 𝟲𝟲̶ٞ𝟲ׁ.« 𝐀̸𝗦ִؗٺ𝐓̴𝐑ׄ͠𝐄͟𝗔̴̷ — «села» 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @AstreaINF 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @AstreaLIFE 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @LingshaUnionsBot [линша] 2. ĐЕØ𝐍𝐈Ṧ — «тейк» 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @DNS1nfo 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @DNS1ife 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @lolly_pie [люмин]
⋅ ⋅ ⎯ !🔋𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 — 🔋𝗂𝗌𝗍 №2 — 30/30¡ 1. 🌫°.𝙀lus𝔗ve ¦︎◖︎𝘀✗︎𝔠ret𝓼』 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @ELsec_inf0 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @ELsec_h0m3 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @h3ave1nn [фаенон] 2. 𝐀 𝐓 𝐋 𝐀 𝐍 𝐓 𝐈 𝐃 𝐀 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @Atlantidaprogekt 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @Atlantidalife 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱:@nyaichinisan1 [миша] 3. ◠ » 𝐁𝗅𝗈𝗈𝖽𝗒 𝐁𝗈𝗈𝗄 𝐒𝗇𝗈𝗐 ⁝ #𝐁𝐁𝐒 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @BBS_INF0 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @BBS_L1FE 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @shellSHEST [авантюрин] 4. ⋅˚₊‧ 𝔖𝔢𝔞 𝔬𝔣 𝔰𝔭𝔦𝔯𝔦𝔱𝔰 ଳ ‧₊˚ ⋅ 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @SeaOS_info 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @SeaOS_life 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @SeaOS_tracking [дань хэн] 5. 𝗣𝐀𝐋…
⋅ ⋅ ⎯ !🔋𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗇 — 🔋𝗂𝗌𝗍 №1 — 30/30¡ 1. ֪ ᛝִ ᷼𝐌𐐼ׄρ𝗅𝖾 ℭ𝗁 ᩙαρⲙִ𝖺𝗇 ೀ᜔࣪ 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @MCinff0 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @MCh0me 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @Hidemyx [странник] 2. 𝓡ᴇғʟᴇxɪᴏɴ 𝓓ᴇ 𝓛'ᴀᴍᴇ 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @RdL_1nfo 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @RdL_l1fe 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @DISSONANT1A [иллуги] 3. 𝐌𝐎𝐑𝐓𝐀𝐋𝐈𝐓𝐄 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @INF_MRT 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @LIFE_MRT 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @Re_VerseD_bot [дурин] 4. «𝗛𝗔ݔ𝖄𝗧𝗜» 𝗖𝗜𝗥𝗖𝗨𝗦 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @hayti_flood 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @life_hayti 𝖴𝖲𝖤𝖱: @XITROSTb_bot [лоча] 5. 𝗙𝗹𝗼𝗼𝗱'𝒂𝒅𝒊 𝖨𝖭𝖥𝖮: @adoi77 𝖫𝖨𝖥𝖤: @adi_flood_life 𝖴𝖲𝖤…
котята спасут мир.
💘2
Sticker, posted without a caption
⋅ ⋅ㅤ⎯ ㅤ!🔋𝗇𝗂𝗈🔋𝗌 — @wrixties¡ [🔋] — ᴨ0дᴄᴋᴀɜᴋᴀ! — ᴇᴄᴧи ᴋᴀᴋиᴇ-ᴛᴏ ᴄᴧ0ʙᴀ ʙᴀʍ ᴛуᴛ н3 ᴨᴏняᴛны и ʙы нᴇ ɜнᴀ3ᴛᴇ их ɜнᴀчᴇний, ᴛᴏ ᴨᴩ0чᴛиᴛᴇ ϶ᴛу ᴄᴛᴀᴛью. .. — ᴄ0юɜ ɜᴀᴋᴧючᴀеᴛᴄя ᴄ нᴀʍи ч3ᴩᴇɜ ϶ᴛᴏᴦᴏ бᴏᴛᴀ: @GMUN10N_BOT .. — ɸᴀйᴧ ᴄ уᴄᴧ0ʙияʍи ᴄᴏюɜᴀ — ᴨᴇᴩᴇйᴛи. ㅤㅤㅤㅤ[🔋]ᴄᴨ1ᴄᴋи ᴄᴏюɜ0ʙ.. .. — 1 ᴄᴨиᴄᴏᴋ. .. — 2 список. .. — 3 список. ㅤㅤㅤ [🔋]сем3йные ᴄ0юɜы.. .. — 1 список.
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @GM_BL8DE. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 677,602 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⋅ ⋅ㅤ⎯ ㅤ𝖦𝖠𝖬𝖫𝖤ㅤ⎯ ㅤ 𝘜𝘕𝘐𝘖𝘕 𝘉𝘓𝘈𝘋𝘌” (@GM_BL8DE), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GM_BL8DE.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.