Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Grandmama | Сказки на ривере

@GMPokerITC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

228subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003966268199
TypeChannel
Username@GMPokerITC
DescriptionGrandmama - инстурментs для роста и развития игрока в покер
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 3 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/GMPokerITC

Growth

2286 Aug 2026, 23:32 — 228 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 03:01 — 228 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 23:327 Aug 2026, 03:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 227–229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 03:01228no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:32228first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
70.8%
avg views ÷ 228 subscribers
Avg views / post
161
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held20 (3 May 202626 July 2026)
Views total484
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16
Videos
1
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

309 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥11436.9%
👍8126.2%
4715.2%
💯206.47%
🎉175.50%
154.85%
👌72.27%
51.62%
👏20.647%
😁10.324%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 309reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 14:14 UTC38 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rocknrollaPoker

В этот понедельник, 27.07 в 18:00 по питерскому времени, состоится подкаст по финансовой грамотности в сфере криптовалют на стриме в прямом эфире. Наш гость - Лихунов Игнат Игоревич - действующий российский адвокат, один из ведущих специалистов в стране по криптовалютным спорам, финтеху и защите P2P-трейдеров. Игнат - бывший следователь (что помогает ему эффективно выстраивать защиту по уголовным делам), а в данный

🔥6

19 Jul 2026, 21:38 UTC213 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Смотрю, напоминает сессию где ты давишь, все делаешь правильно, а на ривере банк каждый раз уезжает от тебя. По матчу прогноз: победа Аргентины по пенальти, хоть там дадут побить😭

👍4😁1

11 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC268 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ITCCashTeamPhoto

Итоги Ставка на стримера #3 🎉 Победитель: Виталий Grandmama (с результатом +84$) Выбывает из сетки: Руслан Hau3yCTb (с результатом +22$) Сегодня "Ставка" снова получила нового победителя. Поздравляем Виталия с мощным годмодом скилловым выступлением и рекордом проекта. Руслан сражался достойно и оставляет себе респект улиц. Финал развернулся драматично, Руслан решил коллировать не по оддсам в банке на 500bb, чтобы

🔥5👍21

9 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC177 viewsread 7 August 2026

Мужики, стрим через 10 мин, подключаемся!

9 Jul 2026, 12:51 UTC209 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ITCCashTeamPhoto

🎙️ Face to face в «Ставке на стримера» : Руслан "Hau3yCTb" vs Виталия "Grandmama" Противостояние игроков команды ITC Cash Team состоится уже сегодня. Мы традиционно попросили героев высказать об их ожиданиях, не ограничивая себя: "Hau3yCTb" Виталий точно соперник посерьезнее, чем Рома aldair68. Во-первых, он не покерный пенсионер, а действующий игрок и тренер (очень похожий на актёра из фильма для взрослых, что гов

👍2🔥21

7 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC184 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ITCCashTeamPhoto

Ставка на стримера от команды ITC Cash Team 🏆 Игроки команды (а в этот раз играющие тренеры) ITC Cash в формате нового игрового шоу вновь проверят на прочность регуляров и любителей низких лимитов. Весь профит заберут зрители наших каналов ✔️ ⏺Два игрока на стриме отыграют сессию на лимите NL10 (два быстрых стола с закупкой 100bb = 1000 рублей) в течении двух часов ⏺Зрители должны будут угадать победителя и резуль

4👍4🔥4

18 Jun 2026, 17:53 UTC338 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Будет критика, пойму😌

🔥71

14 Jun 2026, 13:12 UTC340 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ITCCashTeamPhoto

🎙 Обновление на каналах ITC Cash Team Пару месяцев назад к тренерскому составу ITC Cash присоединился Виталий «Grandmama», и вот он снова стал гостем на наших каналах. В новом видео Виталий вместе с Романом "aldair68" обсудили работу в популярном солвере GTO Wizard. ⚡️ Хиро отобрал три ситуации на лимитах NL100-1k, где поле играет неоптимально, и показал, как точными эксплойтами наказывать данные ошибки. Как поле о

👍7👌322

11 Jun 2026, 09:18 UTC448 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Недавно впервые сходил в покерный оффлайн-клуб, где играют без денег. И словил флешбек. Потому что почти в любом покер-руме в начале ты тоже сидишь на демо-фишках. Я там когда-то зависал — учился кнопки нажимать, рейзить, “играть в покер”. И вот это ощущение один в один. Вроде всё происходит правильно: диллер, фишки,ставки, блефы. Но внутри — пусто. Ошибся — да и ладно. Переиграл — тоже ничего не чувствуешь. Тол

💯17👍41

6 Jun 2026, 15:06 UTC377 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Редкий случай пользы от чистого ГТО😜

🔥9👍621

1 Jun 2026, 08:34 UTC474 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Давайте, не стесняйтесь — делитесь своими графиками и успехами не только в покере, но и в жизни 👇

🔥1521👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GMPokerITC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,094,521 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Grandmama | Сказки на ривере” (@GMPokerITC), 228 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GMPokerITC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.