Engagement
4 posts held, back to 8 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 972.9%
- avg views ÷ 35 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 341
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 4 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Videos
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
10 Sept 2026, 10:31 UTC210 viewsread 12 September 2026 Forwarded from @zjxqqbgkPhoto
【老师艺名】: 雨桐
【联系方式】: @GLAA26A
【验证留名】: 美团小哥
【验证时间】: 9.10
【上课价位】: 1100
【颜值身材】: 人照8分 165左右高 有前有后
【服务内容】: 课表都有
【服务态度】:热情 不催钟
【优点缺点】: 服务类型老师 老师之前是会所的
【推荐程度】: 吃服务的可以去试试
【体验细节】：跟群友们兴奋的聊着天突然间又新来的一位老师上榜手机响着不停，好奇心的我打开榜单看着照片，果然是我喜欢的类型，这不是纯纯的御姐吗，激动的心颤抖的手马上预约起来，幸亏老师碰巧也有空约好时间果断出发，不带考虑来到小区门口，环境非常不错，很安全的一个小区很大，听着老师的指挥到了，楼层老师很谨慎，还要拍照片不错开门那一刻，这身材棒极了，前凸后翘老师的大屁股穿着情趣内衣显示着完美的身材，不争气的小老弟来了兴奋，老师拉着我的小手进入了房间，闲聊了一下，果断交了水费和老师进了浴室🛀这服务，还有谁帮我轻轻地脱掉了我身…
9 Sept 2026, 15:12 UTC471 views0 reactionsread 12 September 2026 Photo
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel name was changed to «非雨勿视🙈»
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @GLA2688A. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“非雨勿视🙈” (@GLA2688A), 35 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GLA2688A.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
