Channel
@GF_Lif
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004423309673 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GF_Lif |
| Description | инфо - @GF_Inf |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 20 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GF_Lif |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 5 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 5 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 6 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (20 July 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,076 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
11 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5384294418150866281 | 3 | 27.3% | |
| custom 5337110590336813597 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5384314016086637510 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5469872500517142196 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5393531475465363968 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| custom 5469769352582559643 | 1 | 9.09% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟 [ 𝐉𝖆𝖉𝖊 ] 🌟 🤩 — Ребятки, мы приняли решение закрыть флуд. Отдачи от участников ноль и сколько бы я не пыталась их разговорить - им всё равно. У меня опустились руки что либо делать, я устала. Поэтому флудик закрыт(( Всех люблю, bye #важноGF
custom 53842944181508662812
🌟 [ 𝐉𝖆𝖉𝖊 ] 🌟 🤩 — Здравствуйте, дорогие. Я сменила юз с @eni_qw на @mivv1q Прошу вас сменить юз на новый🥰. #важноGF
🌟 [ 𝕭𝖑𝖆𝖉𝖊 ] 🌟🤩🤩 — привет здоровяк Выхожу из реста и снова работаю. Так что ищу союзов Условия | @GF_flood_bot 🤩🤩#репостGF
❌🤩🤩 🤍𝓮𝔀 𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓸𝓷 👼 (!!!) ❌ 🌟 В этот прекрасный день был заключен дружеский союз между [🕯] ⋟☆𝐆𝖔𝖑𝖉𝖊𝖓 𝐅𝖑𝖊𝖊𝖈𝖊☆⋞ и 🌫°.𝙀lus𝔗ve ¦︎◖︎𝘀✗︎𝔠ret𝓼』 ⟩ загляните к ним на каналы: инфо - @ELsec_inf0 лайф - @ELsec_h0m3 🌟дата :: 23.07.26 🌟 #союзGF
custom 53371105903368135971custom 53842944181508662811custom 53843140160866375101
[🤩] — Repost time start end
#Ӄαϝӄα — здравствуйте дорогие союзники и папищики я в поисках союзов! Оформить крутую подписку от кафки #ᱬ𑀉Rᥱρ᧐sᴛ
꒰払 ྀ う🤍 ͠𝆹𝅥 𓆪🌟𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆 ⌒✨๑꒱⊹⌒ ۪ ᭡ ︩︪ ࣪ 🎥🎥🎥🎥🎥🎥──────── 🎥🌟одгорел на солнце, потому что не нанес солнце защитный крем:: 🎥🎥🎥⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️Варн🎥🎥 — Загрей 🎥🌟орезал ноги об стеклянный пляж:: 🎥🎥🎥⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️Бан — Скирк — Саки 🎥⭐️⭐️⭐️🌟топился в море:: 🎥🎥🎥 Самостоятельный выход — Кореш — Тоширо 🌟а даный момент 31/70 (+3 бота) участников во флуде. Набор сейчас... открыт!! Tags:; #𝖼𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀_𝑺𝗎𝗇
у нас появился новый следящий — Сандей (@R4ZE7_3). так что он в активном поиске союзов. со всем тут. #𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁_𝒍𝒖𝒏𖥔𝒎𝒐𝒏
мы официально открыли второй чат!! поэтому активно ищем нью. по поводу вступления. #𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁_𝒍𝒖𝒏𖥔𝒎𝒐𝒏
🌟 — я очень ищу союзов, со всем ознакомиться можно здесь. #𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗼𝘀𝘁_𝒍𝒖𝒏𖥔𝒎𝒐𝒏
🤩:: Всем hola, ищу союзников день 2. Буду рад сотрудничеству, писать мне в бот: @xiao_unions_bot #SE_Repost
🤩:: Всем hello, я нахожусь в поиске союзов Буду безумно рад сотрудничеству, писать мне в бот: @xiao_unions_bot Всех жду с распростёртыми объятиями 🤩🤩 #SE_Repost
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @GF_Lif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЗАКРЫТ. [🕯] ⋟𝐆𝖔𝖑𝖉𝖊𝖓 𝐅𝖑𝖊𝖊𝖈𝖊⋞ 𝓛𝓲𝓯𝓮” (@GF_Lif), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GF_Lif.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.