Channel
@GEOPOLITICAL_DISCUSSION
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,275subscribers
-81 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001906175383 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GEOPOLITICAL_DISCUSSION |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GEOPOLITICAL_DISCUSSION |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 25,275 | -20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:54 | 25,295 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 25,307 | -17 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 25,324 | -27 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 25,351 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 25,356 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 25,356 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (27 July 2026 – 16 August 2026) |
| Views total | 113,560 |
| Reactions total | 719 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 14:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
719 reactions across 36 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 531 | 73.9% | |
| 😁 | 49 | 6.82% | |
| 💯 | 29 | 4.03% | |
| 🔥 | 18 | 2.50% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 2.09% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 1.81% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 1.67% | |
| 😘 | 11 | 1.53% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 1.39% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 1.25% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 0.974% | |
| 🤩 | 7 | 0.974% | |
| 🙈 | 3 | 0.417% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.278% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.139% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.139% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.139% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 719reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
काले नभ में खेल रहे हैं, सूरज, चन्दा, झिलमिल तारे; कैसे सुन्दरता खोयेँगे, वे पुतली के वासी प्यारे! चिडियाँ चहक-चहक उठती हैं, ऊषा की लख आली आली, किन्तु लाल की लाली से यह जी की डाल नहीं मतवाली। अब तो दूर गई हरियाली ! ~ माखनलाल चतुर्वेदी
❤12👏7
Signed Saum
👍👍
❤32👍2👏2
Signed राम सिंह Anti-Hindu🚩
पुरुषवादी मानसिकता का एक और खतरनाक रूप तब सामने आता है जब किसी पुरुष का “ईगो” आहत होता है। लड़की उसकी बहन हो, प्रेमिका हो, पत्नी हो, दोस्त हो या कोई अपरिचित महिला—यदि वह उसके अहंकार के अनुरूप व्यवहार नहीं करती, तो उसे परेशान करना, बदनाम करना, धमकाना या उसके चरित्र पर प्रश्न उठाना कुछ लोगों को अपना अधिकार लगने लगता है। क्यों? क्योंकि हमने लड़कों को बचपन से यह सिखाया ही नहीं कि किसी महिला की असहमति भी उतनी ही वैध है …
❤33💯2😘2🙏2👍1
Signed राम सिंह Anti-Hindu🚩
“बेटी होना: अपने ही घर में पराया होने की दास्तान”✍✍✍ एक बेटी जब जन्म लेती है, तो भारतीय समाज के एक बड़े हिस्से में आज भी उसका स्वागत उस हर्षौल्लास के साथ नहीं होता, जिसका वह अधिकार रखती है। बेटे के जन्म पर घर में मिठाइयाँ बाँटी जाती हैं, भविष्य के सपने बुने जाते हैं और वंश चलने की बातें होती हैं; वहीं बेटी के जन्म के साथ ही कई परिवारों के मन में खर्च, दहेज, सुरक्षा, शादी और “पराया धन” जैसी चिंताएँ जन्म लेने लगती हैं…
❤15💯2😘2🙏2🔥1
Signed राम सिंह Anti-Hindu🚩
15 अगस्त: तिरंगा आज़ाद है, हम अभी नहीं✍ 15 अगस्त को हम झंडा फहराते हैं और बड़े गर्व से कहते हैं—भारत आज़ाद है। हाँ, अंग्रेज चले गए। लेकिन एक सवाल 79 साल बाद भी खड़ा है—क्या हमारे दिमाग भी आज़ाद हुए? जिस देश का संविधान कहता है कि हर नागरिक बराबर है, उसी देश में आज भी किसी की औकात उसका चरित्र देखकर नहीं, उसकी जाति देखकर तय करने वाले लोग मौजूद हैं। शादी करनी है? जाति देखो। दोस्ती करनी है? धर्म देखो। घर लेना है? पूछो…
❤22🙈1
Signed राम सिंह Anti-Hindu🚩
❤️
❤11
Signed Saum
UK परमाणु हथियारों वाला पहला 'इस्लामिक रिपब्लिक' है ~ नेतन्याहू इज़राइल के आर्मी रेडियो के लिए एक पॉडकास्ट इंटरव्यू में इज़राइल के प्रधानमंत्री बेंजामिन नेतन्याहू ने कहा कि UK "परमाणु हथियार पाने वाला पहला इस्लामिक रिपब्लिक" बन गया है। उनकी इस बात की तारीफ़ सिर्फ़ होस्ट ने की, जिन्होंने उनसे पूछा कि क्या नेतन्याहू को लगता है कि "पूरा यूरोप ऐसा ही है" – इस बात को प्रधानमंत…
❤5
Signed Saum
Petermann Glacier ग्रीनलैंड के उत्तर पश्चिम भाग में, Nares Strait के पूर्व में स्थित एक बड़ा marine-terminating/outlet glacier है। महत्वपूर्ण घटना 4 अगस्त 2026 को Greenland के Petermann Glacier से उसकी floating ice tongue का लगभग 76.4 km² बड़ा हिस्सा टूटकर अलग हो गया। इस प्रक्रिया को Glacial Calving कहते हैं। इससे एक विशाल, चपटा Tabular Iceberg/Ice Island बना है, जिसकी मोटाई लगभग 150 मीटर तक बताई गई है। यह Petermann …
❤3👍1
Signed Saum
14 अगस्त 1947: आजादी की पूर्व संध्या की कहानी 14 अगस्त 1947 भारतीय उपमहाद्वीप के इतिहास का वह दिन था, जब एक ओर आजादी का उत्सव था तो दूसरी ओर विभाजन की अनिश्चितता और हिंसा की छाया। कराची में पाकिस्तान के सत्ता हस्तांतरण का समारोह हुआ। मोहम्मद अली जिन्ना नए पाकिस्तान के गवर्नर-जनरल बनने जा रहे थे और लॉर्ड माउंटबेटन ने वहाँ सत्ता हस्तांतरण की प्रक्रिया में भाग लिया। इसके बाद माउंटबेटन दिल्ली लौटे, जहाँ अगले दिन भारत की…
❤13😢10👍2
Signed राम सिंह Anti-Hindu🚩
https://youtube.com/shorts/4xsEZ8L4FRc?si=kLlREGvM41JELfwm पाकिस्तान का राष्ट्रीय खेल 😃😃
🤣5😁1
Signed राम सिंह Anti-Hindu🚩
अंततः जातीय पहचान केवल रूढ़िवादी परंपराओं से ही नहीं, बल्कि पारिवारिक संस्कारों, वैवाहिक प्रथाओं, सामाजिक संरचना, राजनीतिक प्रक्रियाओं, सांस्कृतिक परंपराओं और अवैज्ञानिक धार्मिक क्रियाकलापों के संयुक्त प्रभाव से बनी रहती है। इसलिए यदि भविष्य में जातिवाद को कम करना है, तो केवल कानून बनाना पर्याप्त नहीं होगा। समाज को वैज्ञानिक दृष्टिकोण, समान शिक्षा, संवैधानिक मूल्यों और मानवीय गरिमा को प्राथमिकता देनी होगी। धार्मिक …
❤13😘2❤🔥1
Signed राम सिंह Anti-Hindu🚩
जातीय पहचान और धार्मिक क्रियाकलाप : एक सामाजिक विश्लेषण भारतीय समाज में जातीय पहचान केवल सामाजिक संबंधों तक सीमित नहीं रहती, बल्कि अनेक धार्मिक और सांस्कृतिक परंपराओं के माध्यम से समय-समय पर पुनर्जीवित होती रहती है। कई स्थानों पर धार्मिक अनुष्ठानों, विवाह संस्कारों, सामूहिक भोज, तीर्थ यात्राओं, मंदिर प्रबंधन, धार्मिक जुलूसों तथा विभिन्न सामाजिक आयोजनों में लोगों की पहचान उनकी जातीय पृष्ठभूमि के आधार पर भी की जाती है…
❤6💔1
Signed राम सिंह Anti-Hindu🚩
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @GEOPOLITICAL_DISCUSSION. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 678,924 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GEOPOLITICAL DISCUSSION” (@GEOPOLITICAL_DISCUSSION), 25,275 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GEOPOLITICAL_DISCUSSION.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.