Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GENERAL SURGERY (NEET-SS) (INI-SS)

Channel

GENERAL SURGERY (NEET-SS) (INI-SS)

@GENERALSURGERYresidents

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

971subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001645069674
TypeChannel
Username@GENERALSURGERYresidents
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/GENERALSURGERYresidents

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9699759726 August 2026 — 975 subscribers7 August 2026 — 974 subscribers14 August 2026 — 972 subscribers20 August 2026 — 969 subscribers27 August 2026 — 971 subscribers5 September 2026 — 969 subscribers13 September 2026 — 971 subscribers9716 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 968–976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 18:21971+2
5 Sept 2026, 00:16969-2
27 Aug 2026, 23:57971+2
20 Aug 2026, 17:37969-3
14 Aug 2026, 13:06972-2
7 Aug 2026, 18:11974-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:46975first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 September 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1862.1%
1137.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2023 to 17 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Feb 2025, 09:17 UTC≈1,710 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

#1

  1. A9%
  2. B25%
  3. C44%
  4. D22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Feb 2025, 09:17 UTC≈1,630 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔹1️⃣ A 32-year-old, previously healthy man is a victim of a drive-by shooting, sustaining a gun- shot wound to the left lower extremity. The entrance wound is located over the medial aspect of the calf, with an exit wound over the anterior pretibial region. Neurovascular examination of the extremity is normal. There is associated soft-tissue injury from the blast effect and a severely comminuted tibial fracture demon

👍1

4 Nov 2024, 09:04 UTC≈2,670 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

SURGERY Part-1 Join👇👇 https://t.me/GENERALSURGERYresidents

11 Sept 2023, 03:30 UTC≈6,300 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#53. Explanation (E) A number of breast cancer risk factors have been identified. These include family history, benign breast disease with atypical epithelial hyperplasia, alcohol consumption, and HRT. The most common and clinically useful risk factors are age and female gender. In most patients (70%) with breast cancer, however, no other major risk factor can be identified join @GeneralSurgeryResidents

5👍5

11 Sept 2023, 03:29 UTC≈7,290 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

#53.

  1. (A) fibrocystic changes with atypical ductal hyperplasia22%
  2. (B) alcohol consumption4%
  3. (C) positive family history51%
  4. (D) HRT10%
  5. (E) age13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3

11 Sept 2023, 03:28 UTC≈6,140 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#53. A 56-year-old woman presents to the clinic for routine health screening. Her concern is the development of breast cancer. She has no current breast-related complaints. Past history is pertinent for fibrocystic changes with atypical ductal hyperplasia and a single fibroadenoma, both diagnosed by open biopsy 5 years ago. She smokes one pack per day and drinks one can of beer daily. Family history is positive for

2👍1

11 Sept 2023, 03:22 UTC≈3,780 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#52. Explanation A) (C) A new mass in a woman of this age group must be fully evaluated to rule out carcinoma. Though biopsy by fine needle, core needle, or open biopsy will be required to determine the etiology of the mass, they should not be performed until all necessary breast imaging studies have been performed. Imaging should include diagnostic mammography and possibly sonography to determine whether the mass

3👍1

11 Sept 2023, 03:21 UTC≈3,250 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

#52.

  1. (A) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy22%
  2. (B) discontinuation of HRT and reexamination in 4–6 weeks11%
  3. (C) breast imaging36%
  4. D) open surgical biopsy10%
  5. (E) core needle biopsy21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Sept 2023, 03:19 UTC≈3,090 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#52. A 56-year-old woman presents to the physician’s office with complaints of a new left breast mass. She denies any pain, nipple discharge, or skin dimpling. She has a prior history of breast cysts 5 years ago, treated by aspiration at that time. Her last mammogram was at age 53. Past history is pertinent for a 30 pack-year smoking history, prior total abdominal hysterectomy-bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-BS

👍4

11 Sept 2023, 03:16 UTC≈2,740 viewsread 6 August 2026

DIRECTIONS (Questions #52 through #113): Each of the numbered items or incomplete statements in this section is followed by answers or by completions of the statement. Select the ONE lettered answer or completion that is BEST in each case.

5 Sept 2023, 04:20 UTC≈2,770 viewsread 6 August 2026

#51. Explanation (I) Pancreatitis may be the cause of jaundice by different mechanisms, resulting in compression of the common bile duct (CBD). Acute pancreatitis may cause edema of the head with resultant compression of the CBD; pancreatitis may lead to a pseudocyst in the head with compression of the duct; and chronic pancreatitis may lead to dense scarring around the duct with a resultant stricture. The clinical

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GENERALSURGERYresidents. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Feb 2025, 09:17 UTCAnonymous Quiz311 voters

#1

  1. A9%
  2. B25%
  3. C44%
  4. D22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Sept 2023, 03:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz382 voters

#53.

  1. (A) fibrocystic changes with atypical ductal hyperplasia22%
  2. (B) alcohol consumption4%
  3. (C) positive family history51%
  4. (D) HRT10%
  5. (E) age13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

11 Sept 2023, 03:21 UTCAnonymous Quiz215 voters

#52.

  1. (A) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy22%
  2. (B) discontinuation of HRT and reexamination in 4–6 weeks11%
  3. (C) breast imaging36%
  4. D) open surgical biopsy10%
  5. (E) core needle biopsy21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Sept 2023, 04:19 UTCAnonymous Quiz150 voters

#51.

  1. (A) hepatitis A4%
  2. (B) hemolysis4%
  3. (C) choledocholithiasis11%
  4. (D) biliary stricture4%
  5. (E) choledochal cyst3%
  6. (F) pancreatic carcinoma13%
  7. (G) liver metastases7%
  8. (H) cirrhosis11%
  9. (I) pancreatitis43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Sept 2023, 04:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz126 voters

#50.

  1. (A) hepatitis A8%
  2. (B) hemolysis2%
  3. (C) choledocholithiasis8%
  4. (D) biliary stricture6%
  5. (E) choledochal cyst2%
  6. (F) pancreatic carcinoma12%
  7. (G) liver metastases48%
  8. (H) cirrhosis8%
  9. (I) pancreatitis8%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Sept 2023, 03:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz103 voters

#49.

  1. (A) hepatitis A6%
  2. (B) hemolysis2%
  3. (C) choledocholithiasis10%
  4. (D) biliary stricture5%
  5. (E) choledochal cyst3%
  6. (F) pancreatic carcinoma13%
  7. (G) liver metastases43%
  8. (H) cirrhosis7%
  9. (I) pancreatitis13%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2023 to 17 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GENERAL SURGERY (NEET-SS) (INI-SS)” (@GENERALSURGERYresidents), 971 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GENERALSURGERYresidents.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.