Какое красивое число добил.
custom 59515171854268559878

Channel
@GDf47qR
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
57subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002724202519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GDf47qR |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 7 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GDf47qR |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 57 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 59 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 60 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 60 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,016 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5463403691358842037 | 176 | 17.3% | |
| custom 5952028969434880508 | 146 | 14.4% | |
| custom 5951517185426855987 | 143 | 14.1% | |
| custom 5395827371708271060 | 95 | 9.35% | |
| custom 5949810030415976400 | 94 | 9.25% | |
| custom 5474350588038765264 | 88 | 8.66% | |
| custom 5222033323961897511 | 71 | 6.99% | |
| custom 5972262010610523629 | 69 | 6.79% | |
| custom 5949355992243246921 | 67 | 6.59% | |
| custom 5972275677196458500 | 67 | 6.59% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,016reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2025 to 7 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GDf47qR. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2025 to 7 November 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Какое красивое число добил.
custom 59515171854268559878
Sticker, posted without a caption
Я решил, канал прекращает свою деятельность по причине того, что я полностью решил уйти в рж и в своё развитие. Я благодарен каждому читателю и сотруднику тут, но к счастью или к сожалению, у меня выработались другие ценности в жизни. Возможно я всё ещё вернусь ( поэтому мои пантенты в силе), ну а так вы сможете за мной дальше следить в тт, который я вести продолжу thejkline
Перенесу на завтрашний день, я чёт совсем подыхаю как кот старый.
Здравствуйте, сегодня вечером вз рпт. Успейте.
Кошмар, что за отписки?
Рп + рк + мнение. Если у вас рпт/взрпт брать это!
custom 597226201061052362912custom 546340369135884203710custom 595151718542685598710
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 54634036913588420371custom 59515171854268559871custom 59722756771964585001
🤩 TàKə mY $høÉs aÑd WãLK Á MîLə, SoMəTHiñ' tHät у́Öu çÄn'T DØ.
custom 595151718542685598776custom 595202896943488050868custom 546340369135884203763custom 539582737170827106019custom 594935599224324692118custom 597226201061052362918custom 597227567719645850018custom 594981003041597640017
File, posted without a caption
custom 595151718542685598711custom 594935599224324692110custom 59520289694348805089custom 59722756771964585007custom 59498100304159764005custom 53958273717082710604custom 54634036913588420374
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53958273717082710601custom 59493559922432469211custom 59722620106105236291
⚠ Чат для общения «Zäffrà» Без нормы от GòdFādìr.
custom 539582737170827106056custom 595202896943488050853custom 594981003041597640050custom 597226201061052362920custom 594935599224324692118custom 595151718542685598718custom 597227567719645850018custom 546340369135884203717
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GDf47qR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЗАКРЫТ GòdFādìr.” (@GDf47qR), 57 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GDf47qR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.