Channel
@GD98988
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
173subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 15 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002482367006 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GD98988 |
| Created | 17 October 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GD98988 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:54 | 173 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 177 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 177 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 17 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 4 (17 October 2024 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 440 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Sept 2026, 11:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 17 October 2024 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💞名字：金莎 💗年龄：23 ❤️身高：165 😻介绍：极品小菲，漂亮 皮肤白 身材好 腿长 没生过孩子 胸大小刚刚好 非常有气质的妹妹 服务态度很好 服务好会调情， 🉑69式丶无套吹👄戴套做💕深🐒 共浴🛀 调情 👩❤️💋👨 陪酒🥂摸逼🌸舔逼👅扣逼🖕 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 💰 A套餐：一次 6000P 1小时 💰 B套餐：两次 11000P 3小时 💰 C套餐：包夜 18000P 8小时 💰 D套餐：包夜 22000P 12小时 👉👉👉👉👉👉👈👈👈👈👈👈 ✅全马尼拉上门 帕赛 马卡提一次可上门（车费统一收1000）， 较远地区车费另算 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
👍1
💞名字：木玛 💗年龄：23 ❤️身高：164 😻介绍： 长的漂亮 身材苗条高挑 没生过孩子 中国人肤色 本人长的可爱照片看不出来， 服务也很好 口活好 🉑69式丶无套吹👄戴套做💕深🐒 共浴🛀 调情 👩❤️💋👨 陪酒🥂摸逼🌸舔逼👅扣逼🖕 💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎💎 💰 A套餐：一次 5000P 1小时 💰 B套餐：两次 9000P 3小时 💰 C套餐：包夜 15000P 8小时 💰 D套餐：包夜 20000P 12小时 👉👉👉👉👉👉👈👈👈👈👈👈 ✅全马尼拉上门 帕赛 马卡提一次可上门（车费统一收1000）， 较远地区两次起上门，grab计算车费， 较远地区车费另算 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
❤2
🇵🇭小菲实时在线 pinned Deleted message
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @GD98988. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇵🇭小菲实时在线” (@GD98988), 173 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GD98988.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.