4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,356–1,359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 05:23
1,359
+3
10 Aug 2026, 15:02
1,356
-1
7 Aug 2026, 02:16
1,357
no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:05
1,357
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 1,359 subscribers
Avg views / post
218
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
16 (28 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
3,494
Reactions total
99
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
99 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
47
47.5%
👍
18
18.2%
🔥
11
11.1%
🤯
6
6.06%
👎
3
3.03%
💔
3
3.03%
😍
3
3.03%
🗿
2
2.02%
🤡
2
2.02%
⚡
1
1.01%
🍾
1
1.01%
🤔
1
1.01%
🤬
1
1.01%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سرمربی محبوب همگان دیروز بعد 3 سال برگشت و آمادست که یکبار دیگه ما رو به قلب لندن و ورزشگاه ریچموند ببره
به همین مناسبت مروری داشته باشیم به یکی از موندگار ترین سکانس های این سریال✨
نظرتون درباره شروع فصل چهارم؟
@G0ldenTicket | #TedLasso
تغییرات ui به طور واضحی قابل مشاهدست ولی ux تا حد زیادی همونه
طبق تجربه یه ساعتم ازین اپ میتونم بگم خیلی سرعتش بهتر شده و نسبت به تیوی تایم به مراتب با ثبات تره
اینم اکانت منه اگه خواستین فالو کنین
اکانت هاتون رو این زیر بزارین اگه درست کردین
درود بر دوستان خدا زده خاورمیانه ایم
خواستم بگم وسط همه این بدبختی ها سازنده تیوی تایم مرحوم یه اپلیکیشن جدید زده به اسم bingers که عملا همون تیوی تایم هست و میتونین اطلاعات قبلیتون رو اگه بکاپ گرفتین بیارین تو این اپ و دوباره سریال هاتون رو ترک کنین توش
لینک دانلود برای اندروید
لینک دانلود برای IOS
@G0ldenTicket
و این فیلم دستبردار نیست! 🔥
فیلم Obsession در حالی که بودجه ساخت آن تنها 750 هزار دلار بود، از مرز 470 میلیون دلار فروش جهانی عبور کرد!!!
این فیلم به پنجمین فیلم ترسناک پرفروش تاریخ تبدیل شده و ممکن است از مرز 500 میلیون دلار عبور کند و به بزرگترین فیلم اورجینال دهه تبدیل شود 💀
@G0ldenTicket | #Obsession
با توجه به پیشبینی جدید، فیلم The Odyssey با رقم 1.4 میلیارد دلار به کار خود پایان و اکنون فروش این فیلم در گیشهٔ جهانی از 911 میلیون دلار عبور کرد 🙌🏻🔥
اگر رقم مد نظر محقق شود، این فیلم به پرفروشترین فیلم با درجه سنی R (بزرگسال) تبدیل خواهد شد و فیلم Deadpool & Wolverine که رتبهٔ اول است را کنار خواهد زد 🏆
@G0ldenTicket | #TheOdyssey
🎈 اندی ماسکیتی تأیید کرد که فصل دوم سریال شاهکار IT: Welcome To Derry در سال 1935، دهه سوم میلادی، جریان خواهد داشت و به اعماق تاریک شهر دری و نفرین ترسناک این شهر خواهد پرداخت و راجع به فضایِ کنونی شهر دری گفت:
"شهر تقریباً شبیه یه قبرستون هست... بقایای چیزی که قبلاً بوده.... مردم خسته، فقیر، بیکار و بیخانمان شدن و بچهها دیگه اون زندگی آرام و راحت حومهشهر رو ندارن."
او تأیید کرد که مراحل توسعهٔ فصل دوم آغاز و…
قربانیِ جدید بعد از Wonder Man، حالا فیلم Blade...
ماهرشالا علی یک بار برای همیشه گفت Blade کنسل و دیگه هم قرار نیست این نقش رو بازی کنه و بعد از سالها بلاتکلیفی و این شاخه و اون شاخه کردن خسته شده 😭
"من دیگر از این موضوع عبور کردهام... حالم اوکیه... شما با من یه قرارداد داشتید... اگر میخواستن فیلم رو بسازن، حتماً میساختیم. پس دیگر قرار نیست این فیلم رو بسازیم... اونا تمایلی به ساختنش نداشتن، بنابراین خودشان با…
دیروز چی شد؟ هیچی... Wonder Man با کیفیتی که داشت و موفقیتش، کنسل شد!!!
نشریهٔ Variety با وجود اعلام اینکه سریال Wonder Man برای فصل دوم تمدید شد؛ دیروز گفت مارول رسماً این سریال رو کنسل کرد و عوامل هم تأییدش کردن و این درحالیه که این سریال نمرات بالایی گرفت، بیننده خوبی داشت، کیفیت واقعاً خوبی داشت، متفاوت بود و حتی اجرای زیبای یحیی عبدالمتین دوم در این سریال نامزد جایزهٔ بهترین بازیگر نقش اول مَرد در یک سریال کم…
کاترین هان در نقش مادر گاتل و تیگن کرفت در نقش راپونزل در پشت صحنهٔ لایو-اکشن Tangled 🔥🫶🏻
@G0ldenTicket | #Tangled
❤8
Signed m.G𝕆T
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @G0ldenTicket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 34,544 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Golden Ticket” (@G0ldenTicket), 1,359 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/G0ldenTicket.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.