Hey guys I’m the dev Launch will be 6PM EST Have had very successful launches in the past Hoping for big numbers Stay and print https://t.me/BBCLAUNCH

Channel
Future Gems💎
@FutureEzGems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002274925674 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FutureEzGems |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 9 November 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FutureEzGems |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 20 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 21 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 21 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 November 2024 to 2 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://t.me/BBCLAUNCH
🔷$FRTDOG Just launched. Good branding and ticker, Degen Dyor, Be Safe, Gamble! 📱 :https://t.me/walterfartingdog 💲: 300k 📈: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/solana/pair-explorer/A5dg5ueExo1jXDC6FF4MtuD1KhPb1zLS9zPo9QaVu2GN?t=1734189562841 vjTJVR4ZWpnVFYAdFAmQT1yQmVvWdkSoAikTRkvNhat Always win with the Future
680k, now 140k 🔗 🪙$PIDAN Let's see...
🪙$PIDAN Just launched. Good branding and ticker, Degen Dyor, Be Safe, Gamble! 📱 :https://t.me/pidantheskidog 💲: 100k 📈: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/solana/pair-explorer/fJyqtpWRePaUVDZBh2HjEyfWG9V2LogbexpDDjq5qLH?t=1733420540010 BtppQaCFXjZhYANeDjSsmV3EX55druNJs556NGxGA7et Always win with the Future
2x plus, 240k 🔗 🪙$KTO Let's see...
🪙$KTO Just launched. Good branding and ticker, Degen Dyor, Be Safe, Gamble! 📱 :https://t.me/koreaktosol 💲: 100k 📈: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/solana/pair-explorer/5vU9wVcYrt3LkCxHfrLzrcuRnrKFJpwho5YnNJvwsXbW?t=1733240825720 HDtbZ1jcZdr1NjkpYTanwYy2S5fNuzhcGavfyxFv4vsn Always win with the Future
4x,634k 🔗 🪙$FAT Let's see...
🪙$FAT Just launched. Good branding and ticker, Degen Dyor, Be Safe, Gamble! 📱 :https://t.me/Letsallgetfat 💲: 150k 📈: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/solana/pair-explorer/GKx7UGeBeNB4LPgPRYLGAyse26hCtj4KbTAgmpYRRXzJ?t=1732906036939 HcvQvpBUiFrSoaCMLD8uH9UxLR65R6qUq4AS7j4XgHyy Always win with the Future
5x plus, 36k now 23k 🔗 🔷$PINK Let’s see…
🔥1
🔷$PINK Just launched. Good branding and ticker, Degen Dyor, Be Safe, Gamble! 📱 : https://pinkpepecoin.vip/ 💲: 7k 📈: https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x4e68ccd3e89f51c3074ca5072bbac773960dfa36 0x5db6A2cA41A7Ef526f90A3Db83E36109e97Bcfe2 Always win with the Future
8x,800k 🔗 🔷$CYPHERPUNK Let's see...
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FutureEzGems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@FutureEzGems named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Future Gems💎” (@FutureEzGems), 20 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FutureEzGems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.