Channel
@FushumaChain
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
255subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002030660851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FushumaChain |
| Description | 🉐 Empowering People Through Technology, Open Governance and Sustainable Funding. LinkTree 🌴 https://linktr.ee/Fushuma |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FushumaChain |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 255 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 255 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
336 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 102 | 30.4% | |
| 🔥 | 98 | 29.2% | |
| 👍 | 68 | 20.2% | |
| 👏 | 23 | 6.85% | |
| ⚡ | 14 | 4.17% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 1.19% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 1.19% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.19% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 1.19% | |
| custom 5325559344513691205 | 3 | 0.893% | |
| 💊 | 3 | 0.893% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 0.893% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.893% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.595% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.298% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 336reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2025 to 7 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Venture Capital Enters Fushuma ⛩ We are thrilled to announce a major milestone for Fushuma. A private Venture Capital firm has acquired 833,333,333 FUMA tokens via an OTC (Over-the-Counter) transaction. While the investor remains anonymous at this stage, this deal sets the price of the FUMA token at $0.006 USD. This capital commitment validates our progress and establishes a solid price floor for the FUMA token. W…
👍15👏4💊3🗿3🥰2
👺 The Great Erasure: Weekly Crypto Deconstruction #11 The noise of the crypto market is masking a global standardization. The state is building a unified, borderless architecture; the goal is no longer regulation, but total legibility. This week, we deconstruct: • How the UN treaty removes jurisdictional friction. • Why "freedom to transact" is becoming "permission to exist." • The existential conflict between the …
🔥6❤4👍4🍌3🤣1
👺 The Sovereign's Hand: Weekly Crypto Deconstruction #10 The 'Sovereign's Hand' is invisible, but everywhere, proving its claim from the protocol to the physical world. The crypto world must now choose: 'kiss the hand' for protection, or be treated as a threat. This week, we deconstruct: • 1933-2025: Why "offline" is a fiction. • Tribute & Protection: The price for state clemency. • The Geopolitical Crisis: How th…
👍6❤4🔥4
👺 The New Layer: Weekly Crypto Deconstruction #9 What do ZK-Proofs, an Irish legal bill, and a billionaire's investment portfolio have in common? They are the components of a new layer being built on top of and within the crypto ecosystem. This week, we deconstruct: • ZK-Proofs: Now automating KYC/AML verification for the state. • Ireland: National law creating a de facto global standard for encryption access. • …
❤8👍3🔥1
👺 You Are Not Alone: Weekly Crypto Deconstruction #8 The crypto revolution's main threat is not a ban, but an absorption into the system it was built to oppose. More and more are now seeing the same pattern. This week, we deconstruct: • How governments are legislating on-chain censorship. • How courts are forcing DAOs into centralized legal traps. • How Wall Street is stripping Bitcoin of its political soul. T…
👍5❤4🔥4
👺 You Are Being Absorbed: Weekly Crypto Deconstruction #7 The technology you adopted to escape their system is being perfected into their next instrument of control. This week, we deconstruct: • How are they hijacking the word "blockchain" to build systems of total control? • How are oracle networks being turned into the new central banks of data? • Why is "reversibility" being sold as a feature when it's actua…
🔥8👏4❤3
👺 The Counter-Revolution: Weekly Crypto Deconstruction #6 A government's purpose is to protect rights, not abolish them. This week, we ask: • Who gave unelected technocrats the power to create surveillance money without the people's consent? • How is a technology for challenging official narratives being turned into a platform for broadcasting them? • How is the safety of children being used as the cynical excus…
👍6🔥5❤4
👺 The Public Warning: Weekly Crypto Deconstruction #5 The US government's crypto policy has all the subtlety of a baseball bat. The message is clear: get in line. Here’s how the warning was delivered: • After prosecuting a privacy developer, the Department of Justice offers "reassurance." We call it a threat. • Open protocols are to be redesigned to require state ID, turning permissionless ethos into a utopia. …
❤8🔥4👍2
Dear community, An attack potentially affecting hardware wallets has been reported by Ledger's CTO. We recommend exercising caution when performing transactions on the blockchain. Please see the announcement below: 🚨 There’s a large-scale supply chain attack in progress: the NPM account of a reputable developer has been compromised. The affected packages have already been downloaded over 1 billion times, meaning t…
❤9👍4😱4
👺 The Betrayal: Weekly Deconstruction #4 The Plan: A peer-to-peer system with no middlemen, controlled by no one. The Reality? • Middlemen are back: Publicly-listed companies are being created to act as the new crypto banks. • Centralization is here: Two mining pools recently controlled a majority of the Bitcoin network. • Innovation is a crime: Writing code for privacy is now being treated as a criminal act. Our …
🔥9❤3🍌1👌1
👺 Isolate, Infiltrate, Absorb: Weekly News Deconstruction #3 How do you defeat the crypto revolution without firing a shot? You domesticate it. A 3-phase takeover of the space is happening now: • Isolate: Cut off access to the banking system. • Infiltrate: Sanitize the crypto culture with corporate narratives. • Absorb: Seize assets and redefine them as a state resource. Our latest deconstruction breaks down thei…
⚡6❤6🔥6
👺 The Inversion of Principles: Weekly News Deconstruction #2 Every core principle that gave crypto its revolutionary promise is being inverted. • Decentralization is becoming a monopoly. • Pseudonymity is becoming surveillance. • Sovereignty is becoming servitude. They are turning crypto into everything we were trying to escape. A centralized, permissioned system of control. ➡️ Read the weekly deconstruction h…
❤7🔥5👍2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FushumaChain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 101,631 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fushuma” (@FushumaChain), 255 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FushumaChain.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.