Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⋅⋆⊰≼🍎_Frisk_ _kotik_🍎≽⊱⋆⋅

@Frisk_risyu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

72subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002070044297
TypeChannel
Username@Frisk_risyu
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Frisk_risyu

Growth

7210 Aug 2026, 09:16 — 72 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 23:32 — 72 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:1610 Aug 2026, 23:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 71–73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 23:3272no change
10 Aug 2026, 09:1672first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 16 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 5 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52065903953869791142335.4%
👾1015.4%
812.3%
custom 526721325317961542157.69%
🤗57.69%
custom 542935116770654765646.15%
custom 528327254821624434123.08%
💘23.08%
custom 530753617568099703911.54%
custom 537298831188114896011.54%
custom 547423315504297317111.54%
custom 547430054307984412911.54%
custom 547449795266166872711.54%
custom 604632170365347982911.54%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 16 March 2026 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jun 2026, 17:21 UTC56 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

жить жить😵 лягушка по видео из тт😊

🤗52custom 54293511677065476561custom 54742331550429731711

15 Apr 2026, 18:56 UTC103 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

напоминаю о щитпостике☺️ там многа скейчиков бывает😋😋

custom 520659039538697911473custom 54293511677065476563custom 52672132531796154212💘1custom 60463217036534798291

10 Apr 2026, 16:14 UTC108 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

два бистри артика☺️☺️ поклоняюсь этой кисточке, вьхьввх🐾🐾🐾

👾10custom 54744979526616687271

1 Apr 2026, 12:59 UTC113 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

опа, это что, арт??😨😨😨 ☺️у вас спина блястящая☺️

custom 520659039538697911483💘1custom 54743005430798441291

16 Mar 2026, 21:14 UTC103 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

С днём рождения моё далёкое, северное, но такое любимое до ужаса Солнышко!!!!!⭐️☀️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️💕💕💕💕💕✨💕💕✨💕✨✨✨✨

custom 52065903953869791148custom 52672132531796154213custom 52832725482162443412custom 53075361756809970391custom 53729883118811489601

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @Frisk_risyu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,134,915 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⋅⋆⊰≼🍎_Frisk_ _kotik_🍎≽⊱⋆⋅” (@Frisk_risyu), 72 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Frisk_risyu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.