3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 291–292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 20:16
291
-1
8 Aug 2026, 08:16
292
no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:11
292
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 7 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
48.5%
avg views ÷ 291 subscribers
Avg views / post
141
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.709%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held
18 (7 December 2024 – 26 July 2026)
Views total
141
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
77 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
30
39.0%
👍
22
28.6%
🔥
15
19.5%
👏
3
3.90%
💩
3
3.90%
🤝
2
2.60%
👎
1
1.30%
🤮
1
1.30%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2024 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Am Dienstag stimmt der Gemeinderat über den Bebauungsplan für das neue Gaskraftwerk RDK 9 ab 😡
Wir demonstrieren gegen die Pläne und fordern den Gemeinderat auf sie abzulehnen.
eine klimagerechte Energieversorgung ist möglich 💪🌍
📆 DI 28.07.
⏰ 14:30
📍 Marktplatz
❌ Krankmeldung am 1. Tag
❌ sparen bei Gesundheit und Pflege
❌ 4 Jahre befristet arbeiten
❌ Gas Abhängigeit erhöhen
Jede "Reform" ist ein Angriff auf uns alle. Sparpolitik ist nicht alternativlos, wenn wir endlich reiche Menschen in die Verantwortung nehmen.
Jetzt ist es Zeit den Sozialstaat zu verteidigen ✊
Auf dich 🫵 kommt's jetzt an.
Komm auf die Straße 📢
📆 Samstag 11.07.
⏰ 11:00 Uhr
📍 Festplatz Karlsruhe
✊Fridays for Future goes CSD 🏳️⚧️✊
Nicht nur beim Klimaschutz gibt es Rückschritte, auch die Rechte von queeren Menschen werden angegriffen. Als Teil der Klimagerechtigkeitsbewegung ist für uns klar: wir müssen intersektional denken – denn es sind die selben Kräfte, die effektiven Klimaschutz verhindern und gegen queere Menschen hetzen. Mit ein bisschen Rainbow Capitalism und Greenwashing geben wir uns nicht zufrie…
Schon wieder Energiekrise, schon wieder hohe Preise. Es wird immer eindeutiger das wir unabhängig von fossilen Energien werden müssen.
Doch stattdessen will uns Katherina Reiche (CDU) weiter in die fossile Abhängigkeit treiben. Die SPD macht bei dieser teuren und unsozialen Politik auch noch mit.
📢Nicht mit uns📢
Wir gehen am 24.04. auf die Straße
um 16:00 in der Waldstraße 71 vor dem CDU Parteibüro.
Future Rave - No rave on a dead planet!
Überall Krisen, Krieg und nur soziale und ökologische Rückschritte in der Politik?
Eine Nacht lang tanzen wir gegen den Frust an und setzen ein Zeichen für Vielfalt und eine klimagerechte Welt, in der es allen gut geht und die nicht für die Profite weniger zerstört wird!
Wann: 11.4. ab 19h
Wo: Albhäusle Knielingen
Freier Eintritt
Organisiert von Fridays For Future Karlsruhe,…
Diesen Freitag ‼️ Klimastreik in Karlsruhe ✊❤️🔥
Baden Württemberg: Wir können Klima 💚
📅 27.02.
🕒 16:00
📍 Friedrichsplatz
Und am 08. März ➡️ KLIMA WÄHLEN 🗳️
Neue Fossile Infrastruktur? Nicht mit uns ❌
Die EnBW will in Karlsruhe ein neues Gaskraft bauen. Gas ist aber nicht die Zukunft sondern macht uns weiter abhängig.
Wir wollen eine zukunftsorientierte Energieversorgung mit erneuerbaren.
Dafür gehen wir am 14.11. auf die Straße
🕓 16:00 Uhr
📍 Kronenplatz
#RdkNineDanke
Für ein buntes Stadtbild - gegen rassistische Hetze!
Diesen Samstag 25.10. ab 12h auf dem Friedrichsplatz. Kundgebung und anschließende Laufdemo
Weitere Infos folgen
❌BaWü verfehlt seine Klimaziele.
❌Die BlackRote Koalition will Gasinfrastruktur ausbauen.
❌Und Klimaziele werden infrage gestellt.
📢 Zeit wieder auf die Straße zu gehen 📢
!! SAVE THE DATE !!
20.09. (JA ein Samstag)
mehr Infos folgen. 🤞
trotz erfolgreichem Verkehrsversuch, positiver Rückmeldung von Anwohner*innen und Schüler*innen vom Lessing-Gymnasium möchte die Stadtverwaltung die Sperrung am Gutenbergplatz nicht umsetzen. 😡
Wir fordern weiter "Sophienstraße autofrei" 🚗🚫
vor der Ausschusssitzung des Gemeinderats setzen wir uns für die Sperrung am Gutenbergplatz ein
am Donnerstag 03.07.
Um 16:00
auf dem Marktplatz
(die Ausschusssitzung danach i…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @FridaysforFutureKA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 373,922 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fridays for Future Karlsruhe” (@FridaysforFutureKA), 291 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FridaysforFutureKA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.