Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

FrenzWithMoney News

@FrenzWithMoney

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

152subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002354390789
TypeChannel
Username@FrenzWithMoney
DescriptionNo brain. No skill. No shame. Just some FrenzWithMoney. 💸 🚀 PRESALE IS LIVE! 🚀 🎫 Grab your moon ticket NOW! 🌐 frenzwith.money 🔗 linktr.ee/FrenzWithMoney 👥 @FrenzWithMoney_VIP 💬 @FrenzWithMoney_Support
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 22 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/FrenzWithMoney

Growth

1526 August 2026 — 152 subscribers8 August 2026 — 152 subscribers6 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 151–153 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 19:17152no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:47152first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
22
Videos
7
Links
12

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

884 reactions across 20 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥27731.3%
10511.9%
💯697.81%
🥰586.56%
😇313.51%
🕊303.39%
🐳293.28%
👍283.17%
273.05%
🍾232.60%
🍓212.38%
🌭202.26%
🤯192.15%
👀151.70%
👌151.70%
💋151.70%
🤔151.70%
🏆141.58%
👏141.58%
❤‍🔥131.47%
10 further kinds465.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 884reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2024 to 13 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Dec 2024, 15:01 UTC≈3,580 views87 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Boring charts📉💩 or EXPLOSIVE GAINS?💥📈

🌭13💯13💋11🍓10🕊109🍾8👌7

11 Dec 2024, 15:01 UTC≈6,080 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🧍‍♂️ SKINNY GUY - FAT BAGS 💰

💯8🍾64🍓2🏆2🐳2🌭1👌1

9 Dec 2024, 15:00 UTC≈6,450 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

When you know it's a GUARANTEED 100x 🚀💯

🐳12🏆7🍓6🕊6🍾3👌3💋3🔥3

7 Dec 2024, 15:00 UTC≈6,010 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Believe and Achieve ✨🚀

🐳9🌭5🏆5🤡43🍓3🍾3👌3

6 Dec 2024, 15:00 UTC≈10,800 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Smart Money builds castles. Easy Money buys them. 💸🏰

🔥26👍43🤡1

5 Dec 2024, 15:01 UTC≈5,260 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

All you need is love $FRENZ 💸

🔥262👍1

4 Dec 2024, 15:01 UTC≈5,380 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

YOU MAY NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M DOING RIGHT NOW, BUT YOU WILL 😶✨

25🔥3🙏2

3 Dec 2024, 15:02 UTC≈5,230 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Muscles or Money? 🏋️💵 Frenz don’t choose – WE TAKE IT ALL! 🚀💵

🔥22💯4🤣1

2 Dec 2024, 15:00 UTC≈5,250 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Lost plenty on shitcoins? 💩

🔥19💯3🤣2

30 Nov 2024, 14:57 UTC≈5,430 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

And what do you prefer? 💰

21🔥5🤣4🤯2

29 Nov 2024, 14:35 UTC≈5,340 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

A meme can be serious too 😏🤵📈

🔥19💯32

28 Nov 2024, 14:03 UTC≈5,380 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

We are closing a major business deal, and this will undoubtedly propel FrenzWithMoney to 1000X. Stay tuned for more updates soon! 📈💸

🔥21🍾32👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FrenzWithMoney. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 546,287 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FrenzWithMoney News” (@FrenzWithMoney), 152 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FrenzWithMoney.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.