—Любишь млв, но друзья с тобой не согласны❓🙄 🔵 🔤🔤🔤 ✨ —Бесит, что все воспринимают онли гомо пейры❓🤔 Тогда добро пожаловать в-- 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🎶 Администрация ⬇️💻⬇️💻⬇️💻⬇️💻 🎶Герой - главный тут во всём 🙋Зомб - ⭐ ❤️— Хейтеры млв конечно

Channel
🎏🅵🆁🅴🅼🅸🅽🅴🆃 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖋
@FreminetConf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
96subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003300921995 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FreminetConf |
| Description | Старт: 05.07.25 Буст: https://t.me/boost/FreminetConf |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 28 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FreminetConf |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 96 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 96 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.5%
- avg views ÷ 96 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 28.3
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 21.4%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 538 |
| Reactions total | 109 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 574
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 21
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
109 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 46 | 42.2% | |
| ☃ | 22 | 20.2% | |
| 🕊 | 18 | 16.5% | |
| 🆒 | 17 | 15.6% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 3.67% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 1.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😺 🔤🔤🔤🔤🅰️🔤🔤 ... 09.08.2026 ➿Неплохо я вздремнул. ➿Ах, вот мы и встретились снова! ➿Что? Ты меня не помнишь? ➿Ха-ха-ха, тогда позволь мне заново присоединиться к твоей команде! 🤩🤩🤩🤩 Welcome to 〰️〰️ ➿➿➿ 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀➿➿➿ 🤩 Ассоциации аккаунтов 💚 Ассоциации каналов 🤍🤍🤍🤍🌟 РЕГУЛЯРНО 🌟 Ну я постараюсь 🌟 ПОДПИСКУ 🌟 НАВИГАЦИЯ 🌟
︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ .︵ ︎ ︎ ︎⏔ 𖫲 𝓸𝓸♡࣫.թ𝕡𝕜🤩𑄝𝕟𝕗 ︎ ︎ ︎ 𝔀𝔀. гдꫀ ᥲктив𝗻𐇽𑄝я кꭷнфа пꪮ ︎ ︎ ︎ ︎⏜.︵ ︎ ︎ ︎ ꝕ𑄝𝕡𝕡𝕪 թlᨵy 𝕜𝕚𝕥ɕ𝕙ꫀ𝕟 !? ︎ ︎ 𖠗 𝗻𐇽ᥲviꬶа𝕥iꭷn ︎ ︎ ︎ 𖠗 ꭐ𝕡 թꪮ𝕤𝕥 𝔀𝔀թешениꫀ этꭷму ꝕpk ɕꪮ𝗻𐇽fꫀssiᨵn ! 🔤дꫀɕь вы мꪮжꫀтꫀ пꭷдꫀлитьɕя ɕвꪮим твꭷթчꫀствꪮм ɕвязᥲн𝗻𐇽ым с ппк
✅✅ 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️ 𝒟𝒶𝓃𝒹𝓎𝓈 𝒲ℴ𝓇𝓁𝒹 ℐ𝓃𝒻ℴ𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓉𝒾ℴ𝓃ᵈʷⁱⁿᶠ ➡️𝔹 д𝕒лёк𝕠й〰️д𝕒лёк𝕠й г𝕒л𝕒ктик𝕖... П𝕠явил𝕔я к𝕒н𝕒л п𝕠 𝕄иру 𝔻енди, в〰️к𝕠т𝕠р𝕠м е𝕔ть ⛓Новости, ⭐️Конкурсы, и ❤️Интерактивы. 𝔸 в их〰️𝕠𝕔об𝕠м ч𝕒т𝕖, 𝕖𝕔ть 𝔹ℂЯ инф𝕠рм𝕒ция 𝕄ира 𝔻енди!🌺 Представляем вам... Dandys world information! ➡️Зд𝕖𝕔ь вы м𝕠ж𝕖т𝕖 узн𝕒ть мн𝕠г𝕠𝕖 𝕠 𝕄ире 𝔻енди, г𝕠р𝕒зд𝕠 уд𝕠бн𝕖𝕖 ч𝕖м в 𝙱𝙸𝙺𝙸𝙿𝙴𝙳𝙸𝙸, г𝕠р𝕒зд𝕠 б𝕠льш𝕖 ч𝕖м в друг…
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 day
𝚃𝚊𝚐𝚜 : #адмтейк #Фремине #КаМин #арт 𝙲𝚛 : @PersThePenguin on X
🕊4
𝚃𝚊𝚐𝚜 : #адмтейк #Фремине #арт 𝙲𝚛 : @PersThePenguin on X
🐳4☃1🕊1
𝚃𝚊𝚐𝚜 : #адмтейк #Фремине #арт 𝙲𝚛 : @PersThePenguin on X
☃5🕊1
𝚃𝚊𝚐𝚜 : #адмтейк #Фремине #арт 𝙲𝚛 : @Rotmonsun?
🐳5👻2☃1🕊1
𝚃𝚊𝚐𝚜 : #адмтейк #Фремине #арт 𝙲𝚛 : @yureith_69 on X
🐳5☃1🕊1
𝚃𝚊𝚐𝚜 : #адмтейк #Фремине #арт 𝙲𝚛 : @mintificial on X
👀4☃1🐳1🕊1
𝚃𝚊𝚐𝚜 : #адмтейк #Фремине #арт 𝙲𝚛 : @user_vanilla on X
🐳4☃2🕊1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FreminetConf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 235,881 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@AlaskaConfession · 51 post[ВП НЕДЕЛЯ] 𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘷𝘦𝘭 «𝘏𝘰𝘮𝘦 𝘴𝘸𝘦𝘦𝘵 𝘸𝘦𝘪𝘳𝘥»
@homeSwEETweird · 1161 postꪆৎ. ୨// 𝓜a𝓭𝓲er 𝓟o𝓻t... ✧ ꒰໒ : .
@MadierPorfolio · 1131 postmarkiplier confession + daily
@markiplier_cf · 2211 post﹫թoppin ꝕlay kitchen conf + (non) daily ♡࣫
@ppkc0nf · 1331 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎏🅵🆁🅴🅼🅸🅽🅴🆃 𝕮𝖔𝖓𝖋” (@FreminetConf), 96 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreminetConf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.