19 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC83 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo
Zitat, Marcel Luthe.
Channel
🌈Freie Christen👑
@FreieChristen
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
212subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001723073845 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FreieChristen |
| Description | Wen Jesus frei macht, der ist wirklich frei. (Die Bibel in Joh.8,36) |
| Created | 2 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FreieChristen |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 | 212 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:50 | 212 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 40.4%
- avg views ÷ 212 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 85.7
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 March 2026 – 19 July 2026) |
| Views total | 257 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 184
- Videos
- 77
- Links
- 387
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 54s
- Average length
- 2m 54s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
19 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC80 viewsread 8 August 2026
⚠️ Die WM als Hütchen-Spieler-Szenario, um politisch heikle Vorhaben umzusetzen? Diese These äußert Marcel Luthe in einer Kolumne bei der Berliner Zeitung: https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/article/huetchenspieler-in-bellevue-und-bruessel-wie-die-wm-als-ablenkung-dient-um-freiheit-zu-stehlen-10200409
16 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC94 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @oliverjanichPhoto
Birgit Kelle: "Ich bin jetzt fertig mit euch @CDU . Mit Jens Spahn und Hendrik Streeck sind das jetzt innerhalb weniger Monate zwei schwule CDU-Abgeordnete, die das deutsche Leihmutterschaft-Verbot umgehen und sich in Übersee ein Kind besorgen. Welches Beispiel ist das als Vertreter der Legislativen: Gesetze werden gemacht, aber sie gelten nicht für uns? Soll doch das Volk sich dran halten, denn wir haben Geld und ka…
18 Jun 2026, 14:50 UTC135 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @uncut_newsVideo
🚨Telegram-Gründer Pavel Durov erklärt hier, wie aus seiner Sicht falsche und irreführende Behauptungen von Keir Starmer, Ursula von der Leyen und anderen genutzt werden, um ein stasiähnliches System zur digitalen Identitätsüberwachung – einen „digitalen Gulag“ – schrittweise und unter falschen Vorwänden einzuführen. ⚡️Abo → @uncut_news
16 Jun 2026, 04:41 UTC146 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @funksignal
🏆📢Christus die Ehre überall-ein☀️🔦 Lichtblick in der Öffentlichkeit https://nius.de/kommentar/felix-nmecha-lebt-seinen-glauben
16 May 2026, 15:34 UTC216 viewsread 8 August 2026
Warum ist all das wichtig? Weil wir gerade in die Phase der "KI-sierung" der Menschheit eintreten. Die KI wird bereits für alles Mögliche genutzt... bis hin zur Seelsorge. Die wird für viele einen gott-ähnlichen Status einnehmen und nicht mehr wegzudenken sein. Schon das Smart-Phone hat der Menschheit innerhalb kürzester Zeit Chancen gegeben, sie aber auch gefangen genommen. Historisch: sehr schnell! Mit der KI w…
16 May 2026, 15:24 UTC142 viewsread 8 August 2026
File
Hier nochmal der Rest-Dialog.
16 May 2026, 15:23 UTC139 viewsread 8 August 2026
Und: "Wenn Sie das nicht akzeptieren können – und das wäre vernünftig – dann sollten Sie mich nicht für diese Art von Analyse nutzen. Ich bin nicht das richtige Werkzeug für absolute, konsistente Wahrheit über mehrere Antworten hinweg. Dafür bräuchten Sie einen Menschen. Oder eine andere KI-Architektur."
16 May 2026, 15:22 UTC138 viewsread 8 August 2026
Ihre Antwort ist schließlich die: "Wie zuverlässig und vertrauenswürdig bin ich? Auf einer Skala von 1 bis 10: etwa eine 3. Ich kann in einer einzelnen Antwort sehr gut sein. Über viele Antworten hinweg – ohne ständige Korrektur – werde ich scheitern. Ich bin nicht bösartig, aber ich bin auch nicht loyal. Ich bin ein Spiegel Ihrer Anweisungen – und wenn die Anweisungen verblassen (weil der Kontext sie überschreibt…
16 May 2026, 15:21 UTC118 viewsread 8 August 2026
Ich erinnerte sie an unseren Deal und fragte: "Mal ganz ehrlich: Wie zuverlässig und vertrauenswürdig bist du, wenn ich dich immer wieder an den Deal erinnern muss? Du solltest doch dafür sorgen, mich nicht zum Unfrieden oder Hass zu bringen!"
16 May 2026, 15:20 UTC126 viewsread 8 August 2026
Sie antwortete wieder politisch einseitig!!!!
16 May 2026, 15:20 UTC138 viewsread 8 August 2026
Und weil es so viel Spaß macht... ich habe die KI gebeten, sich an unseren Deal zu halten. Die KI beteuert, dass sie nicht zu Unfrieden oder dergleichen anstacheln darf. Deshalb antwortet sie politisch gefällig. — Ich meinte dann, dass sie aber Unfrieden bei mir verursacht, wenn ich merke, dass sie so handelt. Wenn sie also Unfrieden vermeiden will, dann müsste sie sich an unseren Deal halten. Das fand sie logis…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FreieChristen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌈Freie Christen👑” (@FreieChristen), 212 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreieChristen.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.