Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Freedom Loving Patriot

Channel

Freedom Loving Patriot

@FreedomLovingPatriot4life

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

196subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225238802
TypeChannel
Username@FreedomLovingPatriot4life
Created2 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/FreedomLovingPatriot4life

Growth

196199197.57 August 2026 — 199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 198 subscribers15 August 2026 — 196 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 196–199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 12:29196-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:47198-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:32199no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:20199first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
118.4%
avg views ÷ 196 subscribers
Avg views / post
232
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held20 (8 June 202522 July 2026)
Views total232
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC232 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/VPF5m9y7N3U?is=VkVb0nzIBP2xcnMO

Signed Melissalovely

3 Jun 2026, 03:28 UTC705 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/cdcjcFBKwd4?si=YdttqrHxHobmMZag

Signed Melissalovely

2 Apr 2026, 04:58 UTC139 viewsread 7 August 2026

Makes one wonder why any God Believing " Patriots " would be so silent and not public anymore to defend what we fell on the sword for?

Signed Melissalovely

9 Mar 2026, 23:53 UTC158 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Fmasons COWARD B$@%!*s they follow their loser leader lol

Signed Melissalovely

8 Mar 2026, 23:06 UTC121 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @EvaVlaardingerbroekVideo

Curtis Yarvin says the West has "no balls" now and will simply turn into South Africa… "Americans and Europeans will not resist the mass immigration and population replacement. You know, the thought that they will grab their muskets or whatever. It won't happen. Won’t happen at all. What will happen is exactly what happened in South Africa. They will just acknowledge that they've lost their power and their country

Signed nossibkram

8 Mar 2026, 07:43 UTC875 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtube.com/watch?v=eW9xH3feKEo&si=cgL1IWqrPqUgvD8T

Signed Melissalovely

17 Jan 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/0oPsmplxbWs?si=WhHGue_xf74gZUBj

Signed Melissalovely

30 Nov 2025, 00:46 UTC166 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/o5adktS3qh8?si=oBHl1mItSuXx_HsR

Signed Melissalovely

30 Nov 2025, 00:44 UTC131 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://youtu.be/EdOLiSsLIrM?si=buTk-zoU5QcvGkaj

Signed Melissalovely

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FreedomLovingPatriot4life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,225,099 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Freedom Loving Patriot” (@FreedomLovingPatriot4life), 196 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FreedomLovingPatriot4life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.