Channel
@Free_xRocket
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
590subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001867450310 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Free_xRocket |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Free_xRocket |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 590 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 591 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 591 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
🚀 Rocket-чек на 100 USDT (100.0$) Внутри чека: 2500 активация(й) по 0.02 USDT (0.02$) с реферальной наградой 0.02 USDT (0.02$) 💬 BITNEST 2.0 НА СМАРТ КОНТРАКТЕ: https://t.me/twinex_bot/app?startapp=5155531271
Signed 𝙊𝙑𝙊𝙎𝘾𝙃 ᅠ
🚀 Rocket-чек на 2.16 USDT (2.2$) Внутри чека: 108 активация(й) по 0.02 USDT (0.02$) 💬 EXIT BAN
Signed 𝙊𝙑𝙊𝙎𝘾𝙃 ᅠ
🚀 Rocket-чек на 73.38 TON (137.5$) Внутри чека: 2446 активация(й) по 0.03 TON (0.06$)
Signed 𝙊𝙑𝙊𝙎𝘾𝙃 ᅠ
🚀 Rocket-чек на 100 USDT (100.0$) Внутри чека: 4000 активация(й) по 0.02 USDT (0.02$) с реферальной наградой 0.005 USDT (0.005$) 💬 @Jackw - самая продвинутая игровая платформа на основе @xRocket. Заходи и забирай 5 Stars ⭐️ ежедневно по команде /free или кнопкой в профиле!!
Signed 𝙊𝙑𝙊𝙎𝘾𝙃 ᅠ
🚀 Rocket-чек на 4.9 TON (6.7$) Внутри чека: 392 активация(й) по 0.01 TON (0.01$) с реферальной наградой 0.0025 TON (0.003$)
Signed 𝙊𝙑𝙊𝙎𝘾𝙃 ᅠ
Короче, мой друг создал впн сервис Вот вам ссылка (вы получите 7 дней халявных от меня: @nlphavpn_bot
Signed ProZ
🚀 Мульти-чек на 0.075 TAKE (0.09$) Внутри чека: 5 активация(й) по 0.015 TAKE (0.02$) 💬 Чисто чек, просто чтобы потратить баланс
Signed ProZ
Я не знаю лично что делать на данный момент с каналом, так как щяс тема с чеками уже не сильно актуально и даже уже цена тона меньше 100 рублей... Думаю канал не умрет, чет постится будет и розыгрыши будут только нужно будет ждать...
Signed ProZ
Ох тыж, вышли улучшение на факелы, чтобы прокачать нужно 1 млн звезд...
Signed ProZ
🚀 Rocket-чек на 88.2375 TON (110.7$) Внутри чека: 4706 активация(й) по 0.015 TON (0.02$) с реферальной наградой 0.00375 TON (0.005$) 💬 FREE GIFT for EVERY ONE !!! https://t.me/GiftSquadBot?start=7627229690
Signed 𝙊𝙑𝙊𝙎𝘾𝙃 ᅠ
🔥iCrypto-чек на 3750000 FTRCAP Внутри чека: 500 активация(й) по 5000 FTRCAP с реферальной наградой 2500 FTRCAP.💬Чек с реферальной наградой 50%
Signed 𝙊𝙑𝙊𝙎𝘾𝙃 ᅠ
🚀 Rocket-чек на 101.85 USDT (101.9$) Внутри чека: 4074 активация(й) по 0.02 USDT (0.02$) с реферальной наградой 0.005 USDT (0.005$) 💬 🔥 Топовые схемы по заработку в интернете! Где деньги не ищут — их забирают. @BankVzlom
Signed 𝙊𝙑𝙊𝙎𝘾𝙃 ᅠ
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Free_xRocket. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 812,724 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Free_xRocket named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoChecks” (@Free_xRocket), 590 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Free_xRocket.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.