Channel
@Freddie_clickstar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
117subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001702686738 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Freddie_clickstar |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Freddie_clickstar |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 01:46 | 117 | +1 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 116 | +1 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:59 | 115 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:02 | 119 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 120 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 121 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 122 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 122 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 7 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
64 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 43 | 67.2% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 9.38% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 7.81% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 6.25% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 December 2023 to 27 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Heard the news? ClickStar push platform has announced that it’s shutting down. That’s how legends disappear… In just 1.5 years, push traffic has deflated so much that push affiliate networks have become largely irrelevant. What do I think about this? Browsers cracked down on push notifications — that much is obvious. It’s also obvious that internet users have less and less need to visit yet another trashy website…
👍7👏1🔥1
Push Notifications: Not RIP Yet. Officially Confirmed By mid-December, the decline in metrics stopped, and they stabilized. After the New Year holidays, there’s been a slight recovery. Yes, the "Unsubscribe" button on Android and domain bans have reduced push traffic by 35%, but they haven’t killed the format. Push notifications remain a functional tool for monetization and traffic generation. A major announcement…
👍4
📊 2 Months with the "Unsubscribe" Button: How It Impacted Push Ad Campaigns 📅 October 2, 2024, marked a turning point for advertising platforms utilizing push notifications. The introduction of the "Unsubscribe" button and an increase in domain blocks forced the industry to adapt to new realities. Some platforms have stopped accepting traffic to direct links, while others are scrambling to replace blocked domains. …
😢2👍1🤔1
🚨 Google Continues to "Crack Down" on Push Networks 🚨 The automatic unsubscribe feature for push notifications used in intrusive advertising has been active in Google Chrome since 2020. But here’s what’s important: until recently, this feature was rarely enforced. Since late September, everything changed. Webmasters and push networks are now facing mass blocks of subscription domains in Google Chrome. What does th…
🤔2👍1
eidos.network Founded: 2020 Interviewee: Oleksandr Push Notifications — RIP or Not? They’re gradually dying out. Volumes are declining, and we’ve managed to stay afloat so far by increasing rates, but that can’t last forever. Growing or Declining? (Push Notifications) A steady decline: impressions and clicks are falling. Biggest Challenges for Push Traffic Right Now? The unsubscribe button in Chrome and aggressive…
🔥2👍1
Evadav.com Year Established: 2018 Interviewee: Max Lazarenko, Head of RTB at Evadav Is push traffic RIP or not? Not RIP, but it's no longer growing as actively. The market is consolidating, and those who know how to work with quality audiences and adhere to platform restrictions are the ones remaining. Is the push traffic market growing or declining? Unfortunately, it’s more of a decline. With increasing browser …
👍1👏1🔥1
🔥 Freddy here, and we're starting a series of quick interviews with the leaders and owners of push affiliate networks 🔥 RedPush.biz Year Founded: 2019 Interviewee: Max Fuckin, Owner Push Notifications—RIP or Not? Google has started tightening the screws faster here to somehow "clean up" the format. But how quickly will this lead to the complete degradation of the market? 2-3 months or a year? In short, it's not R…
👍3👏1
File, posted without a caption
👍1😢1
🚨 Continuing our series on how Google is "cracking down" on push networks 🚨 The latest update: Google Chrome users now see notifications about sites with high numbers of push alerts, offering an option to unsubscribe directly from the browser’s start page or settings. 🔥 What does this mean? — An increase in unsubscribe rates. — Even less push traffic, even from trusted sources. — A possible need to rethink strateg…
👍1🤔1
🔥 Analysis: How the "Unsubscribe" Button on Android Affects the Push Notification Market 🔥 Did you see the photo with the new button and feel a bit emotional? 😢 The "Unsubscribe" button in push notifications only appeared recently, on October 2, 2024. Now, here are some insights and hard stats on its impact: 📉 83% increase in unsubscribes — yes, that’s no joke. 1. A 12.5% drop in impressions over the month, despit…
👍9
File, posted without a caption
👍2😢1
Many webmasters have noticed a significant increase in unsubscribes. All the pain of push traffic is in these two photos.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Freddie_clickstar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Freddie from ClickStar” (@Freddie_clickstar), 117 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Freddie_clickstar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.