Sticker, posted without a caption
👍1

Channel
@Freameuce
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001782623421 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Freameuce |
| Description | 𝑉𝐼𝐺𝑁𝐸𝑇𝑇𝐸 𝐸𝑇𝐴𝐼𝑅𝑂𝑆 𝑋𝑋𝐼𝐼𝐼 — Melodiousness poetry from quaver ophe deuce reverberate in arcadian. Phosphorescence on a conscientious vow that's veraciously amarathine zindagi. Prosperousness papery is reserved adroitly : @Freameucebot. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Freameuce |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 54 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 54 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 April 2023 to 3 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
👍1
https://t.me/DynastLand/16158
ㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ PRODIGY O’ NOBLES {𖣂 . . ೫} 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐞𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐩𝐮𝐥𝐜𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐬𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐲𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐬𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐡 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐳𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐚’𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐮 𝐢𝐬 𝐡𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐮𝐧𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐲 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐠𝐮𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐛𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬. 𝐍𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐬𝐬, 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝𝐧’𝐭 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐩𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬’ 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐥𝐞𝐥𝐲. ‘𝐓𝐢𝐬 𝐄𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐉𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐮𝐧𝐚𝐯𝐨𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬: 𝐟𝐢𝐞! 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐢𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐥𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬—𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐢
👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
𖦽 .....🕊 𝑜’ 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑙 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑝ℎ𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑜 𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑐ℎ𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑏𝑏𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑡ℎ 𝑖𝑛 𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑝ℎ 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑜𝑢𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑢𝑐𝑒. Prosperousness issa majesty kingdom's that so implies shibboleth ophe everlastingness! Celebration day from hilarity of momentous a'd sumptuousness, send prayers of righteousness to th' omniscient for those who are partying! Sow the progeniture of reverie and amorousness for circumfe…
Rise and shine!
Sticker, posted without a caption
Skuy ciwi ciwi join
STATUS : OPEN. IRREGULAR CROWDS: DOWN ON THE WEST COAST. Enigmatic labyrinth ensnared the misery of obscure land, consciously be fathomed as aforethought withdrawal. Awareness about majority to focus on coalesced emotions wheel— the action, behavior, desire, greatly influenced by the choices to attract distinctive ambition. Beneath passionate eagerness for oxtering illustrious flock, silhouette of the dark turbule…
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ ㅤDragon descended apropos splendiferous hazes and became an extraordinarily charming human integer, thick charisma alongside amazing visuals compose him blissfull as human. Initially, circumstances within the fairyland vaguely ecstasy as dragon which eternally surroundings the world above, straightforward his dream to descend into the oomph has come true. Emerge as human guise whose able move alongside shaped maste…
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Freameuce. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,155,468 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Freameuce named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“FRUMSPEARE DEUCE” (@Freameuce), 54 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Freameuce.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.