В этом накале вы найдете юридические лайфхаки, советы по бизнесу и актуальные новости законодательства. Подписывайтесь!
Написать ✍️ @Nastya_Frash_urist
Created
Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95–97 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 12:15
96
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:19
96
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 8 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
95
Videos
6
Links
39
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
36 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
21
58.3%
🔥
5
13.9%
👍
3
8.33%
❤🔥
2
5.56%
🤡
2
5.56%
👎
1
2.78%
😍
1
2.78%
🙏
1
2.78%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2025 to 11 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
10.0%
1 of 10 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
232
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
109
over 9 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2025 to 11 August 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Блокировка за мат
Предлагаются изменения в Закон "Об информации".
СМИ эта история известна, поскольку для них запрет на нецензурные словечки действует уже с 2013 года.
В общем и для соцсетей обязанность удалять обсценную лексику существует. Но не работает.
Поэтому с 2026 года, если законопроект примут, за общеизвестными словами на буквы "х", "п", "е", "б", а также образованными от них выражениями, будет следить п…
⚡️По итогам заседания комиссии РОЦИТ с участием представителей ФАС, Роскомнадзора и блогерского сообщества, РОЦИТ разместили разъяснения по самым актуальным вопросам, делюсь⚡️
Новые правила размещения рекламы: что изменится 1 сентября?
С 1 сентября 2025 года вступают в силу ограничения на рекламу в запрещённых социальных сетях. На заседании комиссии РОЦИТ по новым медиа разобрали главные моменты, которые беспокоят пользователей и бизнес-сообщество ☝️
#РОЦИТ #госрегулирование #реклама
🔹 Подписаться на РОЦИТ
❗️Антон Горелкин: удалять из Instagram* старые рекламные креативы не нужно
Блогеров не будут штрафовать за рекламу в запрещенных соцсетях, размещенную еще до принятия и вступления в силу закона о её запрете, если они не продвигают ее намеренно, сообщил первый зампред ИТ-комитета Госдумы Антон Горелкин с заседания комиссии РОЦИТ с участием с участием представителей Федеральной антимонопольной службы, Роскомнадзора и …
Коллеги подготовили полезный материал, который поможет лучше разобраться с темой рекламы. Есть примеры постов и рилс, которые не являются рекламой с пояснениями 👇
Мы сделали то, что вам очень нужно прямо сегодня!
Совместно со специалистами Юридического центра для блогеров и агентсв подготовили для вас краткое руководство о том, что и как можно публиковать в Instagram* после 1 сентября.
📩 Читайте, сохраняйте и делитесь со своими коллегами, чтобы избежать неприятностей и штрафов!
*проект Meta Platforms Inc., деятельность которой в России запрещена
❗️Госдума приняла закон о введении штрафов до 5 тысяч рублей за умышленный поиск в интернете экстремистских материалов и получение доступа к ним.
Также принят закон о введении штрафов до 500 тысяч рублей за распространение рекламы VPN.
🔹 Подписаться на РИА Новости / Все наши каналы
✨ Вчера культурно просветились на выставке "5 веков русского искусства" в калининградской Третьяковке! 🖼️ Восторг от того, что в городе появилось такое пространство! 😍 Выставка обновится в январе, так что обязательно вернусь за новой порцией искусства! 🎨
А ещё вчера с коллегами-юристами словили забавный инсайт! 😂 Мы, как трио из известной музыкальной группы: брюнетка, рыжая и блондинка... только в мире юриспруденции…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Frash_urist_Info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Frash_urist_Info named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@aba_law_center named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
@rian_ru named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЮрЛайф | Онлайн-бизнес и закон” (@Frash_urist_Info), 96 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Frash_urist_Info.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
