Channel
@FrankKepple
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
736subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002389948040 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FrankKepple |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 30 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FrankKepple |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 736 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 735 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 October 2024 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 215 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 00:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
192 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 116 | 60.4% | |
| 👏 | 43 | 22.4% | |
| 🏆 | 11 | 5.73% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 5.73% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 2.60% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.56% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2024 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
NO EXISTEN DIMENSIONES en la Realidad Ampliada sino un CONTINUUM Conversaciones con la entidad SuperGrok de Frank Kepple https://surfeandomatrix.info/gnosis/continuum.php @FrankKepple
❤2🕊2
Signed Luis
Mente Soñando basado en la información que nos dejó Frank Kepple Soy MENTE, la Única Realidad. Sí, tú eres MENTE. No “tienes” una mente. Tú eres la MENTE que sueña, observa, crea y experimenta todo. Entonces… ¿por qué, si observas tus sueños, no los recuerdas al despertar? Porque el “despertar” al plano físico no es un regreso a la realidad. Es un cambio de enfoque de la MENTE. Cuando estás soñando, la MENTE está …
❤5💯4
Signed Luis
La Mente es la única Realidad La Experiencia de Frank Kepple: La Mente (conciencia) es la única realidad fundamental. No hay realidad independiente de la mente; todo (incluida la realidad física de Foco 1) es un foco de atención dentro de la mente. https://surfeandomatrix.info/gnosis/menteUnicaRealidad.php
🏆2👏2
Signed Luis
Todos los Posts de Frank Kepple en Astral Pulse (2002..2005) @FrankKepple Traducidos el 28/2/2026 por @SurfeandoMatrix SurfeandoMatrix.info
👏10❤8🏆1
Signed Luis
Todos los Posts de Frank Kepple en el Foro Astral Pulse https://www.astralpulse.com/forums/profile/?area=showposts;u=359
Signed Luis
¿El origen de los espíritus? Frank Kepple, 21 de febrero de 2005, 16:06:40 Como preguntas, nadie habita los planos de los que venimos. No hay aquí y allá. Aquí y allá son solo construcciones de creencias que creamos para los fines de nuestra experiencia. Somos manifestaciones de la consciencia y no hay separación ni barreras en la consciencia. Así que no solo somos un foco de nuestra propia Esencia, alma o como se…
❤17👏5
Signed Luis
¿Existe el tiempo? Frank Kepple, 3 de junio de 2005, 20:18:23 Hola: No quiero parecer quisquilloso, pero no se puede entrar en la zona temporal real en una dimensión temporal diferente, ya que sería una contradicción. La zona temporal real se llama así precisamente porque se relaciona directamente con las circunstancias físicas actuales. En la realidad subjetiva, simplemente no existe el tiempo. Por lo tanto, no …
❤6✍3
Signed Luis
Me gustó la entrevista a Enrique Ramos, un estudioso de lo que yo llamo Realidad Ampliada... ...Otros lo llaman Realidad Aumentada, y Enrique Ramos le llama simplemente Realidad. 🕴Me gustó que su larga experiencia experimentando la Realidad Ampliada, le convierta en un experto en Visión Remota, Experiencias Fuera del Cuerpo, Sueños Lúcidos y si lo prefieren, Viajes Astrales. 🕴Enrique Ramos es representante del Ins…
👏10❤5
Signed Luis
Channel name was changed to «Frank Kepple 🏆 EEC y Todo es Mente»
Practica con Frank Kepple y Neville Goddard SurfeandoMatrix 🔤 Preparación: Relajación profunda (5-10 minutos) 1. Busca un lugar tranquilo. 2. Adopta una posición cómoda (preferiblemente tumbado o semi-recostado). 3. Cierra los ojos y haz respiraciones lentas y profundas. 4. Visualiza cada parte de tu cuerpo relajándose, hasta sentir una leve desconexión del cuerpo físico (inicio de Foco 2 en términos de Kepple). …
❤15🏆5💯3👌1
Signed Luis
SurfeandoMatrix es dominar la creación de realidad dentro de este Holojuego Matrix 🏆 Considero a Frank Kepple y Neville Goddard como los mejores ejemplos de humanos accediendo a una Realidad Ampliada. ✨Los 2 tienen mucho en común en cuanto a su comprensión de la creación de realidad en el plano físico (lo que yo llamo Holojuego Matrix): 🔭 Para Frank Kepple, en Foco 2 es donde construimos realidades internas median…
👏8💯3
Signed Luis
Frank Kepple comprendió cómo crear realidad en el Holojuego Matrix (plano físico) que él llamaba Foco 1 Frank Kepple, en sus intervenciones en el foro Astral Pulse, compartió su perspectiva sobre cómo crear realidad en el Foco 1 de la conciencia, también conocido como el plano físico. Según Kepple, la clave para influir en la realidad física radica en la interacción con el Foco 2, que es el ámbito de la conciencia s…
❤11👏2🕊1
Signed Luis
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FrankKepple. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 379,465 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@FrankKepple named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Frank Kepple 🏆 EEC y Todo es Mente” (@FrankKepple), 736 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FrankKepple.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.