2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 81–83 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Aug 2026, 18:17
82
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:40
82
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
63
Videos
7
Links
85
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
108 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5363801342475245797
23
21.3%
custom 5395324199109663248
22
20.4%
custom 5206386728037784368
20
18.5%
custom 5199591016033689232
12
11.1%
custom 5211131116416671107
12
11.1%
custom 5363931909481044210
8
7.41%
custom 5393360668910951103
7
6.48%
custom 5400002131459578006
2
1.85%
custom 5251264033859836338
1
0.926%
custom 5438536728363146047
1
0.926%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 November 2025 to 6 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @FoxFiNews. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 November 2025 to 6 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Из интересных новостей:
1. Слоны выкатили стикеры "Золотое дно 2", за день после сейла цена стрельнула на +900%. Стикерами занимаются команда одноименного российского сериала и в конце января обещают разыграть между холдерами картины Маши Янковской (по 200к каждая) и раздать новую коллекцию стикеров в формате 1 к 1. Команда в стикерах впервые, интересуются у холдеров про интересующие их утилити, так как останавливат…
У Goodies новый раффл🙃
Цена за штуку: 3 TON
Время окончания раффла: 23:00 мск
Supply: 1104 NFT (442+662)
За два дня до раффла Goodies выкатили гугл-форму для получения WL на этот дроп, но, как у них принято, WL за это юзеры не получили.
Цена входа сносная, продать можно будет дороже. Если повезет - можно будет залутать иксы. Оба набора легендарные
🍽Fox-Fi. Инсайды и новости в мире DeFi.
С новым 2026 годом, лисята🥳
Извиняемся за столько долгое отсутствие постов, под конец года нарисовалось очень много дел👨💻
Совсем скоро вернемся к вам с новыми силами и инсайдами😍
Желаем новых успехов и достижений в новом году🥰
Главное помните, открывать и изучать для себя что-то новое никогда не поздно😉
🍽Fox-Fi. Инсайды и новости в мире DeFi.
Как и ожидалось, холдеров коллекции Teddies (той самой, за которую обещали WL на предстоящие дропы) опять причислили в ряды истинных гоев🫡
В чате холдеров всплывает много случаев, в которых холдерам Teddies с предыдущего дропа не досталось ровным счетом ничего (админ в их числе). Модераторы и админы Goodies совершенно никак не комментируют эту ситуацию.
Напомню, после раффла самих мишек и оглашения инфы о том, что з…
У Goodies новый раффл в коллабе с Cool Cats🤔
Видимо опыт предыдущих ошибок был учтен и теперь цену входа и общий саплай был порезан🤫
Enter Price: 3 TON
Supply; 888 (555+333)
WL Collections; Teddies Nakamoto, Teddies Intern, KFP, Lambo and Doodles Monsters, Cool Cats
Каким образом будет распределяться WL - непонятно, ведь у перечисленных стикеров (кроме Teddies) гигантский саплай, но видимо в порядке некого приоритет…
Поздравляем черных богов с победой😉
Битва завершена, победитель определен. Те, кто делал ставки на победу черных - получили свои выплаты (+20.88%)
Что будет дальше и начислят ли обещанные иксы за сжигание - умалчивается🤔
Для тех кто не в теме: весь движ проходил в @ElephantStoreBot🤫
🍽Fox-Fi. Инсайды и новости в мире De-Fi.
Тайлер покидает Project Mayhem и MRKT😭
Только что Тайлер выложил пост, в котором сообщил о своем уходе и передаче проекта в руки новой команде🫡
Так же Тайлером были упомянуты скины в КС, за которыми он порекомендовал следить. Вероятно, это связано с NFT 2.0 от MRKT и стикеры Тайлера будут использоваться в этой системе по принципу стейкинга🫠
Но пока что это всего лишь догадки, продолжаем следить и держать вас в кур…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FoxFiNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@FoxFiNews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@auction named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fox-Fi” (@FoxFiNews), 82 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FoxFiNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
