Channel
@Forex_backstage
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
319subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002361006587 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Forex_backstage |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 17 November 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Forex_backstage |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 319 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 322 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 323 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 322 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 322 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
219 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 133 | 60.7% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 29.2% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 3.65% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 3.20% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.28% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.913% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2024 to 21 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The Result of 20 Years in Dealing A large broker must have a backup in dealing. Why? 1. To be ready for force majeure-switching to an alternative setup should take minutes, not days. 2. To objectively compare the efficiency of different solutions - and route the main flow where it brings more profit with better client experience. 3. To give clients a choice - which increases loyalty and strengthens trust in the bra…
👍1🔥1
SNAPSHOTS In ECN systems, quotes are transmitted as snapshots. A snapshot is a market state—a cross-section of prices—at a specific moment in time. For instance, if a liquidity provider sends quotes 100 times per second, but the broker only displays them once per second, what you see in the terminal is just one out of a hundred. That’s the snapshot. Many quotes that appeared and disappeared in between those snapshot…
👍8🔥5
Let’s talk about trade cancellations. Recently, we’ve seen a wave of aggressive arbitrage traders, especially from China, earning tens of thousands overnight on gold. As a result, three of our liquidity providers have already filed complaints and asked us to remove these clients from their flow. The alternative? They’ll switch us to a different type of liquidity—less favorable for all clients. But here’s the most …
🔥5👍2
This is the kind of robot I wrote. It makes 800 trades a day and stays in profit.
🔥6👍2😱2
BROKER BONUSES: WHAT'S REAL AND WHAT'S A TRAP? Hi Everyone. Broker Bonuses: What's Real and What's a Trap? The only real bonus is a no-deposit welcome bonus—free money to try trading. All other deposit-based bonuses are just tricks: 1. They artificially increase leverage. 2. They require "trading volume" so high that you lose more than the bonus itself. 3. They get taken back through slippage. 4. Or they simply c…
👍6🔥4👏1
This is a post from a discussion of a previous thread, but I thought I'd let it be a separate post. Not everyone understands how the leverage works. “7 years ago I made a video that explains how leverage works on the broker side. It is in Russian, but there are English subtitles. I hope you will be able to watch it and understand how everything works.” https://youtu.be/VpqO2Sni8-E?si=u9n89CCxuYss6MbV
This is how the aggregated liquidity of RannForex looks like in the AMTS ECN admin. 💻
👍3🔥3
ORDER EXECUTION LOGIC Limit Order A limit order is your request to buy or sell at a better price than the current one (in terms of MetaTrader, although the market accepts limit orders at any level, including worse than the market price; you just specify a price beyond which you do not want to buy). The key feature of a limit order is that it may not be executed if there isn’t enough liquidity, but the price will not…
🔥5👍4
BROKER TRADING CONDITIONS Hi Everyone. The worse a broker's trading conditions (higher spreads, commissions, and slippage), the shorter the time clients stay with that broker. This means the broker must spend more on advertising to attract new clients. The higher the revenue per client, the fewer clients the broker retains. In other words, the more you earn from each client, the more you have to spend on acquiring…
👍6🔥3
MARKUP Markup is a spread surcharge that allows brokers to transfer a commission or part of it into the spread. Markups are applied not only to generate profit (which is the primary goal of any non-charitable company) but also to address imbalances in open positions between liquidity providers who are not settled through a prime broker and to set priorities among providers. For example, one provider offers an avera…
👍6🔥3💯1🤝1
BROKER’S TERMS AND CONDITIONS Hi everyone! Today, I want to draw your attention to an essential document: the broker's terms and conditions. Almost no traders read it, but they should. This document can tell you a lot about the broker. If you want to trade profitably, consistently, and without unnecessary problems, I highly recommend reading the terms carefully—so you won’t be surprised when someone tries to take a…
👍8🔥4🤝1
Be rich and happy in the new year, friends!
👍8🔥5🤝5💯4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Forex_backstage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you use algotrading?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2024 to 21 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Forex behind the scenes” (@Forex_backstage), 319 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Forex_backstage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.