Today news was not good few seconds before down side spike appear but sometimes better then nothing we have few accounts in profits and some few loss But no account wash Alhamdullilah better luck on Wednesday on CPI
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots

Channel
@Forex_Premium_Bots_Public
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
763subscribers
-41 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002471461396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Forex_Premium_Bots_Public |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Forex_Premium_Bots_Public |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 763 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 765 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 771 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 777 | -17 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 794 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 803 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 804 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 804 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 56.3% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 43.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Today news was not good few seconds before down side spike appear but sometimes better then nothing we have few accounts in profits and some few loss But no account wash Alhamdullilah better luck on Wednesday on CPI
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
New Group purchase Alpha Btc EA MT5 VantageMarkets-Live 7 31632016 Msr@1234 Interested persons DM me
👍1
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
Mt5 Agile Global LTD live Login- 880956 Pass- Boykin317$ Server- Agile Global Ltd Login And See Result Mt5 Agile Global LTD live Login- 550550 Pass- Boykin317$ Server- Agile Global Ltd Login And See Result Updated login details
👍2❤1
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
Boom and cash Spikes Detector Our price @50$ Contact @fpb_admin Payment method: Any crypto
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
Admin should invest in this project? Plz vote Yes or No
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍6
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
Plz vote interested persons we should invest in this bot for traders or not?
❤3
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
Mt5 Agile Global LTD live Login- 880956 Pass- BOYkin800$ Server- Agile Global Ltd Login And See Result Mt5 Agile Global LTD live Login- 550550 Pass- BOYkin200$ Server- Agile Global Ltd
❤3
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
Straddle live performance
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
Gann Ea Bloodmoon MT5 Available for sale Price @150$ Very low Drawdown UpTo 85% accuracy server: Exness-MT5Trial15 login: 474198659 password: Forex@premium1 Live account details: Number one capital (N1Capital) 102322 Malik@123 Contact @fpb_admin Payments method: Any crypto
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
💥3X COMBO AI v3.20 MT5💥 #NODLL #MT5 Our Price @60$ Contact @fpb_admin
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
AI Golden Jet Fighter GTX MT4 v1.71.7z https://www.myfxbook.com/portfolio/ai-golden-jet-fighter-gtx/11684132#portfolioSettingsBtn Prop firm ready Price @30$
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
EA Breakout & Retest MT5 Pair EURUSD Timeframe M15-M30 Minimum deposit 250$ Price @35$ Contact @fpb_admin Prop Firm Edition FTMO Compliant
Signed Forex_Premium_Bots
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Forex_Premium_Bots_Public. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Admin should invest in this project? Plz vote Yes or No
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Forex_Premium_Bots_Public” (@Forex_Premium_Bots_Public), 763 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Forex_Premium_Bots_Public.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.