Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Foreskin

Channel

Foreskin

@Foreskin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

188subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001285736580
TypeChannel
Username@Foreskin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Foreskin

Growth

1881901896 August 2026 — 190 subscribers7 August 2026 — 190 subscribers15 August 2026 — 189 subscribers21 August 2026 — 188 subscribers6 August 202621 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 188–190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 15:43188-1
15 Aug 2026, 08:14189-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:15190no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:59190first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.0%
avg views ÷ 188 subscribers
Avg views / post
179
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,072
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
750.0%
👍535.7%
👌17.14%
🤯17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC257 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

⚡Aida I saw your Dad last night☄️ This is one of my most favorite tracks, I can say this is the background sound of my Mind atmosphere now days.

1

31 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC143 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The day I become an Uncut guy, I no longer will need any Uncut friend, seeing uncut private parts of anyone on the internet; I feel it from bottom of my heart that the cause of my need, is an internal problem which my parents made for me, not others people which are uncut.. not other people which are strangers to me. This problem will be fixed by restoring and without getting help mindfully from any Uncut. I started

👍3

31 Jul 2026, 04:02 UTC298 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Name: Moments AI genrated of originally work, the Moments by Shadmehr Language: Persian Not Arabic!

12 Jul 2026, 00:54 UTC946 viewsread 7 August 2026

ختنه بودن در جایگاهِ یک فشن داشتم فیلم مرتبط با دورۀ ابتدایی اسلام را تماشا میکردم، متوجه شدم مسلمان ها یک سری کار انجام میدهند، مثلِ تراشیدن موی سر، اصرار محمد به تمیز بودن و بو نداشتن! خودِ محمد نیز به عنوان رهبر مسلمین همیشه بهترین عطرها رو به تنپوش و بدنش میزد! حالا اضافه کنیم شستن کاملِ پاها در آب هنگام وضو گرفتن رو اینطور به نظر میاد که با پازل رو به رو هستیم، مجموعه ای از رفتارها که در اسلام به آنها در رابطه

4 Jul 2026, 22:41 UTC694 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

مسئله ما دقیقن چیست؟ مسئله ما داشتن فورسکین نیست! مسئله ما عدم زیستِ با تجربه فورسکین است تا جایی که من میفهمم فورسکین یک پوست دولایه و عامل بوی نه چندان خوشایند است خب چه میشود که افرادی مثل من به دنبال چنین چیزی هستند؟ من تقریبن مطمئن شده ام مشکل من نداشتن فورسکین نیست، بلکه یک فاصله ای ست که به واسطه عمل ختنه بین ذهنم و یک قطعه کوچک از بدنم (فورسکینم) ایجاد کرده اند من مطمئنم اگر فورسکین داشتم، اینقدر خواهانش نمی

👍2

4 Jul 2026, 22:21 UTC593 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

An Uncut Latino? the answer is No A Selfish Uncut European? Again.. No A beautiful- way more than- Latinos and Europeans, He is a 🇹🇷Circumcised Turkish guy✂️. Middle East is region of Hot & Cut guys, more beautiful than any of other ethnics. Middle East is richest region in the world which jealous West always wanted and still will it to witnessing it's misery using It's Miltary-base/Apartheid regime Israel to keep us

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Foreskin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Foreskin” (@Foreskin), 188 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Foreskin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.