Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mems UFC

Channel

Mems UFC

@ForMEMS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

545subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001133482092
TypeChannel
Username@ForMEMS
Created30 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ForMEMS

Growth

542545543.56 August 2026 — 544 subscribers6 August 2026 — 544 subscribers13 August 2026 — 543 subscribers19 August 2026 — 542 subscribers27 August 2026 — 545 subscribers6 August 202627 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 542–545 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 13:53545+3
19 Aug 2026, 20:42542-1
13 Aug 2026, 11:23543-1
6 Aug 2026, 18:18544no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:35544first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

285 reactions across 18 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣9633.7%
😁9131.9%
🤮186.32%
175.96%
🤨113.86%
👍93.16%
🗿82.81%
🔥72.46%
🍌41.40%
😎41.40%
🤡41.40%
👎31.05%
💩31.05%
💋20.702%
😍20.702%
😭20.702%
💅10.351%
🙈10.351%
🤝10.351%
🥰10.351%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2024 to 22 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Nov 2025, 12:55 UTC650 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Как составлялись пары на хардкоре

😁9

21 Nov 2025, 21:57 UTC689 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Том, тебя ждет полная слепота, если я все же решусь на наш бой. © жон жонес

😁8

7 Oct 2025, 11:24 UTC904 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣8💅1🤨1🙈1

15 Sept 2025, 08:07 UTC981 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Скандал на Чемпионате мира по вольной борьбе — во время схватки с Исмаилом Мусукаевым, японец Йошиносуке Аояги начал странно двигать тазом над соперником. Мусукаев вспылил и нанёс японцу несколько ударов по лицу, в том числе локтем. Позже Исмаил заявил, что не гордится своим поступком, но «на Кавказе такое поведение неприемлемо». 👉 Топор +18. Подписаться

🤡4😁31👍1

13 May 2025, 17:02 UTC≈1,400 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Ладно, ьарьба это гейство. Запишусь на бжж. Бжж:

😁112🤣2

8 Apr 2025, 07:37 UTC≈1,570 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Всем привет Зачем он в конце понюхал руку?

🤮5🤝1

28 Aug 2024, 07:09 UTC≈1,980 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Борцуха использовал против оппонента запрещённый приём: чел пёрнул ему в лицо, заставив бойца блевануть прямо в захвате. 👉 Топор +18. Подписаться

😭2

28 Jul 2024, 05:20 UTC≈2,350 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Дайте газ для Белала🔥🔥🔥

😁14🔥7💩3💋2

20 Jul 2024, 07:48 UTC≈2,160 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Ни дня без барьба

🤣3😎3

1 May 2024, 10:34 UTC≈2,480 views34 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

У нас сейчас нет претендента на титульный бой в полутяжелом весе, поэтому я позвонил Анкалаеву и спросил его:«Магомед, знаешь кого-нибудь, кто может подраться в титульном бою?». Он ничего не ответил, просто заплакал. © Dana White

🤣30👍2🤨1😎1

22 Apr 2024, 11:42 UTC≈2,080 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

За кого будете болеть?

😁5👍41

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ForMEMS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mems UFC” (@ForMEMS), 545 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ForMEMS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.